Going to walk down the post and address what I can because I think you've earned it as a longtime community member. -------------------- "MegaETH is supposed to be a chain for apps, and now you're undermining some that were boosted by the campaign." >>> We are not undermining apps with this move. In fact, we are re-emphasizing our efforts on apps because we recognize that that is how we win. The problem is that we evaluated Terminal data and saw that it wasn't the best deployment of our time and resources. Our superpower, right now, is the stuff that doesn't scale: Hands-on product feedback personalized GTM. We drifted to far from that, saw it, and are now going back to it. It doesn't mean programs and campaigns stop going forward - it just means they're more opinionated than Terminal was (and how we used to do them). The problem wasn't solely inorganic activity, but it was a factor. The problem is that in 2026 we weren't able to attract the good activity with the inorganic activity. It was disproportionate and a bad influence on our apps. Users overwhelmingly creating noise and low-quality feedback (but there was good to be found). -------------------- "The boosts weren't perfect, and early users weren't rewarded for activity before Terminal, except for certain boosts. But what are you going to do for us?" >>> This is hard for me to interpret because one of the singular largest feedbacks we got for Terminal was that it was TOO strongly favoring existing users. Example comment (with 10k impressions): xitter.cf/cpongl/status/20567892… It's true too. Point allocations gained to this point heavily favored pre-Terminal users because of their multipliers and was going to decay over time (but that didn't have time to play out). -------------------- "Why not just finish season 1 and stop the campaign as planned after two months?" >>> I think it's important to remind everyone that Terminal and points are a cost to us. They are not imaginary or free. So your ask is "Why didn't you continue to run a program that you believe was ineffective or a misallocation of resources for longer because I was doing it?" We saw that the spend was leading to an outcome that didn't justify the cost, so we shut it down and will re-route the resources elsewhere. -------------------- "MOSS won't solve anything, and you're hiding behind it. We need fapps, consumer dapps, Morpho, and Pendle." We very much are not hiding behind it - we're clearly communicating to you what we think will lead to the thing you're specifically asking for within our ecosystem. MegaETH is technologically great. So great, in fact, that it's forcing us to have to re-build everything around us so that the underlying can even be leveraged. Indexers, block explorers, and now wallets (MOSS). See: xitter.cf/Barthazian/status/2056… The current ecosystem isn't built for our chain, so we're taking some of that into our hands. People complain that our apps are slow, have too many clicks or a new one is required for every application. It ruins the experience on Mega and dampens users willingness to explore on different applications because they have to top up everywhere. Well guess what? MOSS fixes this. That means net-new applications can spin up, leverage MOSS and immediately have responsive experiences that tap into funds users have on MegaETH for other apps that use MOSS. No more new wallets. THAT is how we unify the eco and give new apps the ability to instantly have access to liquidity and performance. It's also why we're focusing on it. -------------------- "How will you reward those who were there before Terminal? >>> Covered above. -------------------- "Do you really think that people who wanted to deposit USDM and received points without using the chain deserve them? They would receive USDM even though they contributed nothing? Some didn't even touch the chain and are in the top 100. That deserves a redistribution to those who actually used the chain. >>> Why do you assume this is the case? xitter.cf/0xHeisenbruh/status/20… -------------------- "How will you give value to Mega? With MOOS, will we be able to pay for gas in Mega or USDM?" >>> Yes, you can. Gas sponsorship, pay-in-any-token are both features. That is the strongest value prop of MEGA which we have detailed elsewhere plenty of times. Value there comes from USDm growth first and foremost which is what we're focusing on instead of Terminal. -------------------- "How will you revitalize the system to attract dApps used after this latest failure?" >>> By doing exactly what we told everyone we would do; getting back to non-scalable, heavy focus on key apps that will set Mega apart from the rest of the world and attracting net-new users from both inside and out of CT.