Pinned Tweet
I want to be very clear about what I’m holding for the foreseeable future..
My core positions are $TAO, $TIG and ribbita-by-virtuals:native
These are the three I have deepest conviction in because my belief is they're building critical infrastructure for the future of our society
Infra for intelligence.. algorithms.. agents.. money.. systems that entire industries will be built on
My bet is that adoption grows over time.. and years from now the market values them completely different than they do now
That's the game
My other major position is $QNT
I built that position many years ago with a simple promise to myself..
Don't touch it until 2030.. I intend to honour that
I also hold sizable positions across #Bittensor subnets
Anyone who has followed this account for a while probably already knows which ones I have the strongest conviction in..
@chutes_ai, @Hippius_cloud, @affine_io, @metanova_labs etc
And then there are a couple of positions sitting in my portfolio that are fucking disasters
Way too smashed to pieces to make much sense of selling now
At this point.. I’m simply hoping they eventually recover enough to make things worthwhile
I don't pretend every investment I make works.. it doesn't
But I want to be clear..
These are the positions..
This is where my capital is..
This is what I believe in..
Not interested in popping up years from now saying what I would have bought
This is the skin I have in the game now..
And I'll accept whatever comes with being right or completely fucking wrong
I'm sure everyone will tell me what an twat I am now and how wrong I am about where my capital is parked
But there it is
Lets see what happens..
🍻
𝗗𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗗 𝗕𝗢𝗡𝗚𝗢 retweeted
I want to be very clear about what I’m holding for the foreseeable future..
My core positions are $TAO, $TIG and ribbita-by-virtuals:native
These are the three I have deepest conviction in because my belief is they're building critical infrastructure for the future of our society
Infra for intelligence.. algorithms.. agents.. money.. systems that entire industries will be built on
My bet is that adoption grows over time.. and years from now the market values them completely different than they do now
That's the game
My other major position is $QNT
I built that position many years ago with a simple promise to myself..
Don't touch it until 2030.. I intend to honour that
I also hold sizable positions across #Bittensor subnets
Anyone who has followed this account for a while probably already knows which ones I have the strongest conviction in..
@chutes_ai, @Hippius_cloud, @affine_io, @metanova_labs etc
And then there are a couple of positions sitting in my portfolio that are fucking disasters
Way too smashed to pieces to make much sense of selling now
At this point.. I’m simply hoping they eventually recover enough to make things worthwhile
I don't pretend every investment I make works.. it doesn't
But I want to be clear..
These are the positions..
This is where my capital is..
This is what I believe in..
Not interested in popping up years from now saying what I would have bought
This is the skin I have in the game now..
And I'll accept whatever comes with being right or completely fucking wrong
I'm sure everyone will tell me what an twat I am now and how wrong I am about where my capital is parked
But there it is
Lets see what happens..
🍻
I'm in a weird place..
This isn't going to be a cheery post.. so apologies in advance
Been thinking a lot lately about things lately.. in a strange place
Let me explain..
The whole purpose of this account has always been to try and find interesting things early..
Spend a stupid amount of time understanding them and then try to help other people understand them too
Sometimes I've got it spectacularly right.. sometimes I've got it spectacularly wrong
The first time I really felt like I was making a genuine difference was with $QNT
Back in 2018, @quantnetwork's marketing was pretty fucking terrible
I think even @gverdian would probably be the first to tell you that himself
Overledger was fascinating.. the vision was enormous.. but there was very little information out there that ordinary people could easily understand and digest
So.. I started researching everything I could get my hands on and tried explaining it to people
Every single day.. for years
I watched over time.. a community forming around something that hardly anybody had heard of or even cared about
I'm not claiming responsibility for $QNT's success.. That would be ridiculous lol
But I know the work I was putting in made a difference to a good few people
I still see things I wrote or created back then being shared around today..
And that genuinely makes me happy
But something happened as time past and as $QNT grew
The project became bigger.. more established.. more professional..
There were more people unpacking everything.. better sources of information.. more voices.. more things happening.. and many of it better than I was capable of producing
And naturally.. the role I'd played in those early days became less important
The $QNT community of today largely have no idea who I am..
It didn't happen overnight.. but I just gradually became less relevant to something I'd once felt like a meaningful part of
And if I'm honest, I understand why..
Thats what is supposed to happen when things grow
Then along came $TAO
Back in 2022.. #Bittensor was this strange little experiment with some incredibly ambitious ideas and a tiny community..
Not many people understood what it was trying to do
But something about it was deeply fascinating..
The ambition.. the people.. the passion.. the possibility of what it might eventually become
And once again..
I felt a need to research the fuck out of it and help try to explain it to others
Years of reading.. researching.. writing.. answering questions.. and talking about something most people didn't give much of a shit about
And again.. I am in no way claiming its success is down to my dumb ass lol
But I know it made a difference
There are key people building and participating in #Bittensor today who first discovered it through this account..
And I'm incredibly proud of that
But look at $TAO today..
Its grown into this enormous, complicated ecosystem with miners.. developers.. subnet teams.. VCs.. businesses.. and people far more technical or knowledgeable than I'll ever be
There are people doing incredible work explaining every little part of it
$TAO doesn't need someone like me in the same way it once might have..
And again, thats a good thing..
Its exactly whats supposed to happen
But..
I'd be lying if I said there wasn't something strangely sad about it
You spend years helping people understand something.. and eventually it grows beyond the point where your contributions really matter anymore
Its like..
You wanted it to grow.. and you helped it grow.. and then one day you realise its outgrown you
The weird, sad thing is..
Its mirroring a lot of what I'm experiencing in my personal life right now
Which is probably why I'm writing this ramble nonsense in the first place
So.. I became a father when I was young..
And my daughter has always been the absolute jewel in my crown
I don't think I could ever properly explain how much that little girl has meant to me
When she was younger, I was her everything.. her entire fucking world
Dad could fix anything.. dad knew everything..
I was the strongest person alive
If something scared her, she came to me.. if something made her happy, she wanted to tell me..
If she needed help.. I was the person she'd look for
I was her superman
And fuck me.. theres no feeling quite like being somebodys entire world
But..
Then they grow up..
And it happens so gradually that you barely notice it
They start figuring things out for themselves..
They make friends.. they develop their own interests.. they have their own opinions.. their own problems.. their own little world that you're not always part of
They don't need you to explain everything anymore..
They stop running to you for every little thing..
And eventually.. you realise that person who once thought you were capable of absolutely anything has started to see you for what you really are..
Just a man
Yes, a dad who loves her more than anything.. but just a man nonetheless
And if I'm being completely honest..
Thats been fucking heartbreaking in a way I wasn't prepared for
Its something I have been struggling with deeply..
And not because she's doing anything wrong.. she's doing exactly what shes supposed to do
She's growing into her own person.. she's becoming independent
She's building a life that won't always revolve around me..
And I'm so incredibly proud of her every single day
But.. theres a real sadness that comes with it that I don't know if a lot of others feel or if its just me
You can be unbelievably proud of who your child is becoming.. all while desperately missing who they used to be
And theres absolutely nothing you can do about it
You can't ask them to stay little.. you can't ask them to need you the way they once did
You can't ask them to keep seeing you as Superman when they're old enough to realise that its not who you ever were..
You just have to accept that your place in their world is changing
That the version of you they needed for so many years is slowly becoming someone they don't need quite so much anymore
And I think thats the feeling I've been struggling to put into words
Well.. without rambling like a maniac, that is
Obviously..
Being a dad and talking about crypto on the internet aren't remotely comparable in terms of importance..
But theres a slight, strange similarity in the feeling
In both cases, you spend years giving something your time.. your attention.. your energy.. because you genuinely care about it..
You watch it grow.. you feel useful.. you feel like your presence matters
And then, if things go well.. it needs you less
Not because you've necessarily done anything wrong.. But because it's grown
And you find yourself standing there feeling proud of something.. while quietly grieving the place you used to have in that world
I personally think theres a particular kind of loneliness in that
And its not like you've been rejected or anything to feel it
It just happens.. and life moves forward
And the space you once occupied gradually gets smaller and smaller
And even in saying all of that.. you wouldn't change a single thing
I wouldn't want $QNT to go back to being a tiny project nobody understood just so I could feel of use again
I don't want $TAO to stop growing so I could remain one of the people helping to explain it
And I certainly wouldn't want my daughter to stay little forever just so I could keep being her hero
I want her to grow.. I want her to find her own way
I want her to become strong enough that she doesn't need me to solve every problem
I think thats what being a dad is supposed to be about
But..
Knowing that doesn't make watching it happen any easier
I suppose I'm beginning to understand that a lot of life is like this
You spend your younger years trying to become important to people..
Trying to be useful.. to have relevance in the world
To have an impact and make a difference..
And then you get older and realise that however important you were.. it isn't permanent
Communities move on and forget you exist..
People move on with their lives..
Children grow up..
The world keeps turning..
And you're left trying to figure out who you are when you're no longer needed in quite the same way
Being a dad is all I've know my entire adult life..
And being in this space doing this has been close to a decade now
I'm still incredibly grateful for everything I've been part of.. I've been lucky
I think.. I'm slowly accepting that my role in these things is changing
And maybe thats something I need to learn to be comfortable with..
Because I don't think the answer is to desperately try to remain important or relevant
Or to resent the fact that something has grown beyond you
I think you just have to find a way to be happy that you were there when it mattered and had a hand in it at all
Even if it doesn't matter quite so much anymore
And with my daughter..
I know she'll always be my little girl.. even when I'm no longer the centre of her world
My hope is that as she gets older and life gets more complicated.. she'll always know I'm here
She doesn't have to think I'm Superman.. and she doesn't have to need me every day
I just hope she has a little place for me in the life she's building
I guess what I'm trying to say is..
There's a difference between wanting to be needed.. and wanting to be loved
I think getting older is learning to live without the first.. while hoping you never lose the second one
I don't really have some uplifting conclusion to all of this
Apologiees for the long emotional ramble
At the end of the day.. I'm not whatever you guys think I am
I'm just a dad watching his little girl grow up.. and a bloke on the internet watching things he once helped explain grow into something that no longer needs him
And I'm proud of all of it.. I really am
I just didn't realise that watching things become everything you hoped they would be.. could sometimes feel so much like losing so much
I'll stop rambling now..
Thinking out loud here..
I've always assumed a #Bittensor subnet would struggle to replicate what $TIG is building
But the more I think about it.. the more I'm not sure
$TIG has its own Optimisable Proof of Work system.. where algorithms compete, benchmarkers test them, and then innovators get rewarded based on adoption
$TAO obviously works differently.. with miners, validators and Yuma Consensus deciding how rewards get distributed
But..
Given how flexible #Bittensor subnets can be.. whats actually stopping someone from building a subnet with its own version of $TIG's benchmarking, verification and reward system?
Could someone essentially recreate something similar to OPoW inside #Bittensor?
Someone like @Apex_SN1, for example..
Obviously.. just because something is technically possible doesn't mean it would economically work
Still questions around incentives.. verification.. licensing.. how rewards are distributed.. and whether it would all work properly at scale
And maybe $TIG does have some very real advantages from being built specifically for algorithmic discovery
But.. does that mean theres something fundamental about $TIG's architecture that would make it incredibly difficult for a #Bittensor subnet to replicate?
Or.. does it basically come down to who designs the better system and executes it properly?
I can already see the replies coming.. lol
I'm not trying to FUD anything here.. I'm obviously heavily interested in both $TAO and $TIG
I just think its a genuinely interesting question worth exploring..
Because the more I think about this stuff..
The less convinced I am that its as simple as $TIG = algorithms and $TAO = intelligence
My dumb monkey brain does not know the actual answer..
So happy to be educated 👍
lium 8xH100 rental fully configured within 12 seconds.
We know your time is valuable, so we don't require a sales call, request for quota form, or 30 minute provisioning like competitors do.
If you need compute, the fastest and cheapest way to get it is on lium.
We have more availability, better software, and faster service than your current GPU provider.
The problem with #Bittensor is..
If you spend even a week not keeping up with whats happening.. you end up so far out of the loop its a fucking nightmare trying to catch up
Theres just so much happening across the ecosystem, which is constantly changing
And thats before you even get into what individual subnets are building
Its honestly ridiculous
I'm been pre occupied with life shit this week..
But I usually spend a lot amount of time researching this stuff and still feel like I'm constantly playing catch up
Its a good problem to have..
But fuck me, this ecosystem doesn't know how to sit still
The moment you're out the loop.. you're fucked
$TAO
Makes me so happy when I find a fundamentally strong project..
And nobody gives a single shit about it
🔵 @Hippius_cloud is the cheapest.. most secure.. and most private cloud storage solution on the planet
$TAO
𝗗𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗗 𝗕𝗢𝗡𝗚𝗢 retweeted
The trust layer for autonomous agentic interactions must be distributed, machine-native, and AI-to-AI by default.
Not human-to-AI. Not AI-to-human. Not dependent on centralised platforms or human approval at runtime.
Agents must be able to independently discover, authenticate, verify authority, resolve standards and provenance, enforce permissions, and establish trust across organisational and protocol boundaries.
Humans define governance, accountability and dispute mechanisms. Machines handle trust verification and enforcement at the speed and scale of autonomous interaction.
Globally discoverable trust. Locally verifiable evidence. Distributed execution. Autonomous interaction.
@cheqd_io $cheq
⚪️ "I think that we're going to create the most powerful artificial intelligence there is"
⚪️ "#Bittensor will be the foundation layer for all the ways we build companies in the world of artificial intelligence in the future" @const_reborn
⚪️ "If we're not really competing with OpenAI, with our stack that we're building in about 5 years, then I think we would have failed"
$TAO
Hope it works out
$TIBBIR
𝗗𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗗 𝗕𝗢𝗡𝗚𝗢 retweeted
Replying to @SajoLik
Here's my thinking..
$TIG will become as big as $TAO currently is imo
But.. $TAO will grow substantially from here
Given time.. $TIG will also grow substantially from $TAO's valuation now
Both are stupidly undervalued
Both will be worth hundreds of billions in the future
$TAO first.. then $TIG
I wholeheartedly believe that.. and I'm positioned accordingly
⚫️ "I definitely see #Bittensor as sort of becoming equivalent of TCP-IP for the world" @shibshib89
$TAO
My potential price targets for $TAO would just be laughed at..
$TIG open sourcing their mining pool code is actually a bigger deal than most people realise..
Anyone can now take that code and launch their own pools
Essentially letting anyone build competing pools and create a business around it.. without anyone elses permission
Results in more competition.. lowers the barrier to entry.. and a much wider network of contributors
Like I said.. its a bigger deal than it looks
Kudos to the @tigfoundation for making that possible 👏
$TIG
We've now open-sourced the code for a mining pool that runs on TIG.
Want to run your own? Fork it. Give it a name. Set your own rules. Open it to whoever you like.
The pool assigns benchmarks to members' machines, submits their work under the pool's TIG account, tracks credits and collateral on Base, and handles settlements and withdrawals. Most of the groundwork is done. The rest is up to you: hosting, branding, payout model, fees and spending caps.
What's the point? For those new here, pools help smaller benchmarkers balance their factors across challenges. More pools mean more people can take part, and healthier competition across the network.
That's why we're putting the code out there so anyone can build on it. No need to start from scratch.
Pool server: github.com/tig-foundation/ti…
Member client: github.com/tig-foundation/ti…
MIT licensed. Still in development, so expect some bugs.
This whole @const_reborn and #bittensor decentralisation debate is interesting to me..
Seen a lot of people questioning how much influence @const_reborn has over the protocol.. and whether thats a good thing for something geared towards decentralisation
I get the concerns in theory..
But I think people massively underestimate just how insanely difficult it is with what #bittensor is trying to achieve
We're talking about the creation of an entirely new economic system for producing intelligence
Its..
1. A massive fucking deal for society
2. Massively fucking complex
A system where people anywhere in the world.. with little obstacles.. can compete to build anything.. solve problems.. and get rewarded based on the value they produce.. in an open, permissionless arena.. and have it all just work at the network level.. plus held together by economic incentives.. that need to work globally at scale..
That is a ridiculously difficult thing to get right
I mean.. just look at how much #bittensor has already changed over the years..
We've gone from the early days of the network to an entire ecosystem of subnets.. dTAO.. changes to emissions and incentive mechanisms.. and now stuff like Gamma and eTAO
Everything is constantly evolving because they're still figuring out how the core parts should actually work
We've never seen anything quite like this before..
Its not like there is some fucking instruction manual sitting around that Const or others can follow
Some ideas will work brilliant.. some don't
Some mechanisms will just sing.. others will completely need rethinking
And yeah.. there's gonna be plenty of expensive mistakes along the way.. thats the cost of building something as fundamentally important as this
When I personally see @const_reborn challenging shit.. or proposing changes.. or pushing things in another direction to make things stronger..
I see someone who's spent years and years obsessing.. way more than you and me or anyone else.. over an insanely complicated system that is for the greater good.. and is still deeply invested in making it work
I think that means something and deserves a lot of credit
Now..
I've had pretty much no one on one time with @const_reborn over the past four years..
Apart from some group talk.. I've barely had any private conversation with the guy and he's not someone I've gone out my way to get close to.. I personally don't think we'd gel well and I'm perfectly cool with that
But that has absolutely fuck all to do with how I judge his work
I don't need to be someone's mate.. or agree with everything they say.. or even particularly warm to them personally.. to recognise when they're doing something pretty extraordinary
And when it comes to what @const_reborn has created and continues to build with #bittensor..
I have an enormous amount of respect for the man’s work
All thats to say..
I've no relationship with the guy.. no reason to glaze him or defend him.. but his actions and what he's achieved speaks for itself and should command respect
On to decentralisation..
It doesn't magically make every decision better or every system run smoother
Having hundreds of people vote on something doesn't mean they'll understand the technical consequences of that decision.. or the economics.. or the second order effects of the thing they're voting for
Sometimes.. you genuinely need someone with an exceptional understanding of the system to make those incredibly difficult calls
Especially when so much of the foundations are still being figured out
And this.. right now.. in #bittensor's current state and life cycle.. is where I personally think @const_reborn involvement is incredibly valuable.. and possibly necessary
But.. in saying that.. I understand the complication
The whole point of #bittensor is to create an alternative to intelligence being controlled by a handful of powerful companies or individuals..
A belief that open competition should matter more than permission..
Where no single organisation should get to decide who can participate in creating intelligence..
That the network should be bigger than any one person
Well.. those principles will have to apply to #Bittensor itself eventually
We can't spend years arguing that intelligence shouldn't depend on a handful of powerful people.. only to create an alternative that ends up relying on one extraordinarily important guy or girl
Even if that individual happens to be someone who's capable of being the person in charge
Its not whether @const_reborn should have less influence tomorrow.. Its how #bittensor gradually gets to a point where it no longer needs anyone like him to keep progressing
And I think @const_reborn completely understands this
More developers who understand the protocol inside out..
More people capable of proposing genuine improvements to the network..
Better governance models.. less reliance on small groups.. a move away from centralised structures..
And yes.. eventually an architecture that keeps chugging along and improving regardless of who comes and goes
True decentralisation
Not decentralisation for the sake of being able to say you are
We shouldn't be rushing to distribute authority before the networks even figured out how to make any of that work properly yet
But the goal should always be working towards making #bittensor more resilient.. more independent.. more distributed.. and harder for anyone to control
But imo.. timing matters a lot here
#Bittensor is still so fucking young relative to what its trying to become..
The mechanisms are still evolving.. the subnets are still getting to grips with how to optimise everything
We're only beginning to explore what happens when these different markets start producing valuable services and potentially buying and consuming eachothers intelligence
There's so much fucking work left to do
Me?
I'd much rather have @const_reborn heavily involved during these critical stages than rush towards some half ass baked governance structure.. that looks great on paper but ends up slowing everything down or creating a whole different set of problems
But.. that also can't become an excuse for keeping things centralised for too long..
Its both a race and a balancing act
Genuine progress towards distributing authority and access as the network matures
Actual changes to how decisions get made.. who can make them.. how the protocol continues developing without relying on any one guy
And I don't see anything wrong with backing @const_reborn's work while also expecting that to happen
I think you should be able to have enormous respect for someones vision and still want them to build something that eventually outgrows their own influence
And again.. I think @const_reborn understands that better than us all
So yeah.. I genuinely believe #bittensor is better off right now with Const continuing to play such an important role
But.. long term?
I think.. the greatest thing @const_reborn could ever achieve is building something so fucking successful.. so resilient.. and so decentralised.. that it no longer needs him
Because then.. #bittensor will actually become what its supposed to be
$TAO
















