Pinned Tweet
My blocking rules are simple: ad hominem attacks, threats, slurs, harassment, spam, disinformation, bots, or bad-faith engagement. Disagree with my arguments all you like. Once you abandon the argument to attack the person, I'm abandoning you.
Reply here to make it easy.
Jared Wesley retweeted
"Mark Carney won this fight."
That's my assessment of Alberta's referendum.
The PM emerged stronger. Danielle Smith now faces a divided party, a weakened mandate, and an electorate that wants its government focused on other things.
My take on Hub Politics:
youtu.be/Bv7vovAZiXA?si=HlgT…
Jared Wesley retweeted
An interesting finding from our first Saskatchewan poll:
53% are satisfied with Mark Carney's federal Liberal government, compared with 39% dissatisfied.
That's higher satisfaction than the provincial Sask Party government receives (46%).
More SK polling to come.
abacusdata.ca/saskatchewan-p…
How the Smith govt approaches immigration policy depends on how they interpret the results of the 5 referendum questions.
Individual voters approached those ballots in several different ways, making the mandate murky.
Did they see it as a values, system, or human issue?
Jared Wesley retweeted
Replying to @acoyne
IMO the debate surrounding immigration which starts and end with a simplistic focus on numbers misses the point.
We currently have shortages of housing and social services for the number of residents we are trying to accommodate.
At the same time we have shortages of skilled labour in many areas essential to the pace of economic growth we wish to achieve, such as construction, plumbing, electrical trades, engineering, professions, entrepreneurship, heath care, education, childcare, law enforcement, financial services...
Immigration which can help address skills shortages is not net cost immigration, it is net benefit immigration. But immigration which is not attuned to market needs can be net cost.
Let's have a more thoughtful discussion about this instead of polarizing it as others countries have.
Jared Wesley retweeted
Keith Wilson’s post-referendum reflections are quite something.
After spending years arguing that independence was Alberta’s only viable future, he pivoted to encouraging people who actually wanted to remain in Canada to vote Option 2 for supposed negotiating leverage.
Now, having lost by roughly three to one, he’s celebrating those same votes as the foundation of a growing independence movement while announcing that he intends to keep supporting the UCP, whose premier explicitly campaigned for remaining in Canada.
So independence was essential, then it was negotiating leverage, and now the path to independence apparently runs through a federalist premier and a party committed to keeping Alberta in Canada.
That’s an impressive amount of political manoeuvring without actually getting anywhere.
I particularly wonder what the federalists who voted Option 2 for “leverage” think about being retroactively recruited into his independence movement. Presumably, their membership cards are in the mail.
"Alberta’s experiment with direct democracy and constitutional cosplay is a cautionary tale for populist leaders who see referendums as a bargaining tool and the country’s supreme law as a plaything."
My latest on what the separatists and Danielle Smith share in common: a spectacular failure in generating "leverage".
policymagazine.ca/danielle-s…
Jared Wesley retweeted
Danielle Smith is 100% correct when she calls out Justin Trudeau for destroying the oil and gas industry in Alberta.
Just look at this chart. Terrible.
Jared Wesley retweeted
My latest, on immigration as Danielle Smith's consolation prize: the less the facts support the hysteria, the worse it becomes
theglobeandmail.com/opinion/…
Exactly. 💯
Replying to @DrJaredWesley @acoyne
And how much has this kneecapped Alberta ever playing the ‘we demand change or else’ card. Prior to the referendum, any implicit threat was vague but still somewhat present.
Separatists lost 3 to 1. Danielle Smith lost on all four constitutional questions.
Both tried to use referendums to “send a message” and “gain leverage.” Both learned the risks the hard way.
My column in Policy Magazine tomorrow draws out the lessons from their failures.
My latest on what the separatists and Danielle Smith share in common: a spectacular failure in generating "leverage".
policymagazine.ca/danielle-s…
By popular demand, we've secured a bigger venue! New tickets are available for Monday's event, hosted by the Peter Lougheed School of Politics and Democracy.
Register here:
groupize.com/gz/app/organiza…
Happy to join @planetjanetyyc on This is Calgary - Inside Alberta's historic referendum vote cbc.ca/listen/cbc-podcasts/1…
We have a word for leaders who bend rules to banish opponents from their parties and herd them into separate electoral districts to silence them.
It starts with D.























