Pinned Tweet
🚨 THE 99% DESERVE EARLY ACCESS
“You can blow your savings in Vegas… but you can’t invest early in AI, robotics, or nuclear? Absurd.”
We’re pushing to tokenize private markets so everyday Americans can invest before valuations hit billions.
$SUI transactions have been picking up in a BIG way.
39M in one day yesterday and over 3X higher on average versus 2 months ago.
Something is cooking.
If people believe they are actually able to control SI (Super Intelligence) they aren't paying attention.
⚡️The most revealing word in Trump's entire statement is “BANNING.”
Because something much larger is happening here.
The American presidency is attempting to declare the arrival of superintelligence before the world has established that the threshold has been crossed.
That reveals a change in how political power is beginning to relate to machine intelligence.
Historically, governments derived authority from human institutions. Expertise, elections, laws, military command, bureaucracies. Machines supplied information that people interpreted.
Now consider what happens when the government formally describes a technology as possessing intelligence superior to humanity.
The burden of authority begins shifting toward whoever controls the supposedly superior intelligence.
And here is where the real mechanism appears.
The companies controlling these systems determine their training, objectives, access, deployment, and constraints. Yet the public increasingly encounters their outputs as judgments originating from something more intelligent than any individual human.
That produces an extraordinary asymmetry.
The machines acquire the reputation of superior judgment. Their owners retain the power to determine what that judgment serves.
Trump's proposed terminology accelerates that psychological transition. Once institutions begin calling something superintelligence, questioning its conclusions becomes socially and politically different from questioning ordinary software.
The word itself begins manufacturing deference.
The next phase is a competition over who gets to define, certify, and control superior intelligence. Governments will want strategic command. Corporations will want proprietary control. Both will want the legitimacy that comes from claiming access to capabilities beyond ordinary human reasoning.
Superintelligence is becoming a category of political power before it has become an agreed scientific measurement.
And the most consequential question is already taking shape.
When a government publicly declares that machines possess superior intelligence, what happens when their recommendations conflict with human authority?
Who gets overruled?
Who takes responsibility?
Who decides what the machine is allowed to optimize?
The real struggle ahead is over who gets to speak with the authority of an intelligence that society has been taught to regard as superior to its own.
That struggle has begun before the machines have even earned the title.
This is really dumb @WhiteHouse ! Why?
Terms like AI, AGI, and ASI were intentionally created and differentiated to describe phases of capability.
Now we are supposed to call non-ASI AI SI?
This is unproductive
You can't kill Bitcoin.
But that hasn't stopped people from saying that $BTC will drop to $0. And these aren't nobodies saying this. These are HUGE names in the space.
Chamath Palihapitiya, Jason Calacanis, Jeremy Grantham. They've all said something similar. So far they've all been WRONG.
Where do we go from here? Who's right this time?
Let's break it down 👇
No way!! now this is pretty cool. I prefer it straight from the 🐸. but for those who can't / won't this is great!
HOLY SHIT 😱
𝟱-𝗠𝗲𝗢 𝗗𝗠𝗧 𝗡𝗔𝗦𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗣𝗥𝗔𝗬 𝗶𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴!
(𝘗𝘩𝘢𝘴𝘦 2𝘣 𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘴 𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘺𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘥𝘢𝘺.)
193 people with treatment-resistant depression tested it.
They got ONE dose, with some therapy.
And 29 days later?
26% of the 8mg group were in remission.
vs only 8% for the 0.3 mg group.
Plus, all of the improvements were still showing up 8 WEEKS LATER!
PLUS, most people were ready for discharge within 𝘵𝘸𝘰 𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘥𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨.
Now THIS is the kind of psychedelic research I want to see.
Larry Fink is the Chair of the WEF, you know, the organization that plans how the world will work...
@BlackRock put out a paper saying AI agents prefer bitcoin:native as a store of value over anything else and are all in on Bitcoin themselves.
And you're letting a few retards from Silicon Valley tell you it's going to $0?
Come on. Use your brain
@Jason @chamath @alexwg
China's AI trade just erased $480 billion. But the real warning is buried in the valuations.
The STAR50 crashed 40% and still trades at 100 times earnings. The Nasdaq 100? Around 30.
Here's what Wall Street should worry about.
AI stocks account for 42% of Chinese market value but 57% of trading activity. Speculation became dangerously concentrated, and when confidence cracked, the selling fed on itself.
The technology can change the world and still destroy investor wealth.
America isn't immune to that math.
Luxor just raised $16M to expand its AI compute business.
Here's what Bitcoin investors should be watching.
Mining companies already control something AI desperately needs: power infrastructure.
If AI customers offer better returns on that infrastructure, miners have a financial incentive to diversify.
Bitcoin mining's biggest competitor could become AI.
The future of wealth goes beyond traditional assets.
WLTH CEO and co-founder Tim McCann takes the stage at the @Forbes_MENA Family Business Summit today to explore the next frontier of value.
Connect with Tim and the WLTH team.
The next big opportunity starts with a conversation.
Beyond traditional assets. Tim McCann takes the stage at the @Forbes_MENA_ Family Business Summit today.
If you are at the summit, Tim would be glad to meet. Message him or the team to find a time.
🚨 BITCOIN'S RISK PROFILE IS CHANGING.
Grayscale reports $BTC's annualized realized volatility has fallen to 43%. A decade ago? Its 10-year average was 64%. Five years ago? Around 81%.
Bitcoin is now LESS volatile than Oracle and Coinbase shares.
But isn't volatility what attracted us to $BTC in the first place? Well, maybe... but banks and companies don't want that kind of volatility.
You can't have insane daily moves and institutional adoption at the same time.
Pick one.
🚨 THE FED PAUSE ISN'T THE BULLISH SIGNAL YOU THINK.
Markets price an 88.5% chance of no rate change Wednesday. But December is the real problem.
Traders see roughly an 80% chance of rates moving higher by then. For crypto, that means liquidity could remain under pressure even if the Fed pauses.
Watch the December rate expectations, not just Wednesday's headline.
This is where your strength gets tested.
Not at the tops, but at the bottoms.
Are you strong enough?
China's property market is collapsing in slow motion.
Investment down 21%. New construction down 25%. Four straight years of monthly declines. Even during the 2008 financial crisis, property investment kept growing.
Here's the uncomfortable part.
When property is a major store of household wealth, a housing crash doesn't just destroy developers. It destroys confidence, spending, and local government revenue.
China doesn't just have a property problem. It has a confidence problem.
And you can't stimulate confidence into existence.
SpaceX closed $40 billion in debt to buy GPUs.
One company. One deal. Chips landing in the first half of 2027.
And Musk says the door is already shut for almost everyone else, guys. Lenders have basically stopped funding any company without real revenue outside AI data centers.
There are 200+ neoclouds out there. He thinks most get wiped out or swallowed.
I take that seriously. In 2000, telecoms borrowed billions to lay fiber for demand that hadn't shown up yet. Global Crossing went bust. The fiber stayed in the ground and ran the internet for the next decade.
AI compute is running the same playbook, right?
SpaceX can borrow because Starlink and launches pay the bills. The pure plays are borrowing against a future that's still being priced.
Crypto teaches the same lesson every cycle. The projects left standing after the squeeze are the ones with revenue that exists without the hype.
So which AI names actually have a Starlink behind them?
I really wish @claudeai had some better voice models to chat with. Am I missing something or are there really only 5 to chose from?
Bitcoin just lost $80K, and the timing couldn't be worse.
Iran tensions are escalating. $400M in leveraged bets wiped out. Wall Street pulled $770M from bitcoin:native ETFs in just two days.
Is this another geopolitical shakeout or the start of something much bigger? And why could your crypto wallet be the real danger?
Let's break it down 👇
