olimpio (@OlimpioCrypto) header
olimpio (@OlimpioCrypto) profile picture

Yield farming, DeFi, Airdrops

Joined October 2021
Photo by olimpio (@OlimpioCrypto)Photo by olimpio (@OlimpioCrypto)Photo by olimpio (@OlimpioCrypto)Photo by olimpio (@OlimpioCrypto)Photo by olimpio (@OlimpioCrypto)Photo by olimpio (@OlimpioCrypto)Photo by olimpio (@OlimpioCrypto)Photo by olimpio (@OlimpioCrypto)Photo by olimpio (@OlimpioCrypto)Photo by olimpio (@OlimpioCrypto)
Breaking: Arbitrum security council freezes $70,000,000 from KelpDAO hacker
The Arbitrum Security Council has taken emergency action to freeze the 30,766 ETH being held in the address on Arbitrum One that is connected to the KelpDAO exploit. The Security Council acted with input from law enforcement as to the exploiter’s identity, and, at all times, weighed its commitment to the security and integrity of the Arbitrum community without impacting any Arbitrum users or applications. After significant technical diligence and deliberation, the Security Council identified and executed a technical approach to move funds to safety without affecting any other chain state or Arbitrum users. As of April 20 11:26pm ET the funds have been successfully transferred to an intermediary frozen wallet. They are no longer accessible to the address that originally held the funds, and can only be moved by further action by Arbitrum governance, which will be coordinated with relevant parties.
21
5
2
175
32,790
KELP rsETH BACKING SCENARIOS FROM LLAMARISK 1. Full socialization • Mainnet and L2s are treated equally • Backing loss: 15.12% • Aave's bad debt: $123,708,727 • Umbrella covers $54,060,000 only of mainnet losses (60%) 2. Losses isolated to L2s • Mainnet retains full value, L2s take the loss • Backing loss: 26.46% • Aave's bad debt: $230,113,582 (only L2s) 3. Aave coverage plans: • DAO holds $181m ($62m in eth-correlated, $54m in Aave, $52m in stablecoins) • 80% of ETH in umbrella has requested a withdrawal • Llamarisk suggested pausing the module. Withdrawals cannot be finalized while paused • If losses are passed onto L2, umbrella would not be used • A point to consider is that when there's a liquidation and utilization is 100%, the fallback is to receive aWETH instead, which keeps the liquidator’s capital in the reserve until utilization drops. This is dependant on what Kelp decides and negotiates with L0 Source: governance[.]aave[.]com/t/rseth-incident-report-april-20-2026/24580 @LlamaRisk
Not worth it to be in defi right now. Risk has became outsized compared to opportunity $290m stolen and we have a 3 day delay without any of the involved parties clearly explaining what happened and the potential extent of ramifications Looks like they've all lawered up and the chosen pathway is to shift blame and point fingers • Aave says mainnet rsETH is 100% backed • LayerZero says Kelp is negligent for ignoring their +1/1 DVN suggestion, posting a poor post mortem • KelpDAO says that is LZ's default configuration, and that it was L0's infrastructure was compromised Meanwhile: all layerzero transfers halted (that includes USDT0), aave at 100% utilization is critical markets, ethena with 270m USDT stuck in aave mantle, htx/justin sun exposed, curators pulling from markets, aave losing 35% TVL, sUSDe slightly offpeg, borrow yields skyrocketing All of this is expected given the ramifications, but, comparatively, let's take a look at how Fluid handled comms/resolution in the Resolv hack (granted, hole was much smaller). If the goal is not to 100% screw over all users, protocols need to get in a room and work together The three of them are at fault, Kelp for deciding to use 1/1, LZ for getting breached and not enforcing >1/1, and aave for accepting such large collateral caps when comparatively other alternatives were safer in their assessments Bottom is in
16
8
106
28,256
Not worth it to be in defi right now. Risk has became outsized compared to opportunity $290m stolen and we have a 3 day delay without any of the involved parties clearly explaining what happened and the potential extent of ramifications Looks like they've all lawered up and the chosen pathway is to shift blame and point fingers • Aave says mainnet rsETH is 100% backed • LayerZero says Kelp is negligent for ignoring their +1/1 DVN suggestion, posting a poor post mortem • KelpDAO says that is LZ's default configuration, and that it was L0's infrastructure was compromised Meanwhile: all layerzero transfers halted (that includes USDT0), aave at 100% utilization is critical markets, ethena with 270m USDT stuck in aave mantle, htx/justin sun exposed, curators pulling from markets, aave losing 35% TVL, sUSDe slightly offpeg, borrow yields skyrocketing All of this is expected given the ramifications, but, comparatively, let's take a look at how Fluid handled comms/resolution in the Resolv hack (granted, hole was much smaller). If the goal is not to 100% screw over all users, protocols need to get in a room and work together The three of them are at fault, Kelp for deciding to use 1/1, LZ for getting breached and not enforcing >1/1, and aave for accepting such large collateral caps when comparatively other alternatives were safer in their assessments Bottom is in
30
22
7
321
84,722
🚜 10 hours left to deposit on @stable. $970M so far This will likely be nowhere as good as Plasma's $XPL, but given market conditions, it probably still outperforms current rates. Rules: -Max amount $1M per wallet -KYC needed -Total deposits accepted: $500M -USDC on mainnet -Allocations calculated pro rata -After allocations are determined, the excess of $500M will be refunded -This is the second wave of predeposits. In the first wave, they raised 850m, where alleged insiders feasted -Website: hourglass[.]com/stable -Contract: 0xd9b2CB2FBAD204Fc548787EF56B918c845FCce40 Yesterday's timeline: -They messed up their front end while attempting to prevent direct contract deposits, so they had no way to properly track who deposited on their website and who did it directly -As a consequence, they now accept all deposits, front-end or smart contract Pro rata allocations -Total cap is still 500M, but it will be filled pro-rata -The deposit contract accepts up to 10B USDC. Currently, it has 945M. -People can deposit up to 1M per wallet and get an allocation based on their share of total deposits -Example: a wallet deposits 1M. Total deposits = 1.5b. This wallet gets a $333,335 allocation, and $666,665 is refunded. -1 000 000 / 1 500 000 000 = 0.066667% -0.066667% of 500 000 000 = $333,335 What we are getting out of the predeposit: -It's not public yet whether this will be a direct airdrop or a token sale (like plasma). It's also unclear how much total token supply will be allocated to this. Deposits lock: -First 850m wave: used @ConcreteXYZ to handle deposits. On Dec 13th, users can request a 7-day withdrawal -Second 500m wave: using @hourglasshq to handle deposits, and there's no information yet, but from their discord they've said max 31st of Dec. If you want to monitor the influx of deposits: -https://etherscan[.]io/token/0xa0b86991c6218b36c1d19d4a2e9eb0ce3606eb48?a=0xd9b2cb2fbad204fc548787ef56b918c845fcce40 What are they doing with the money? -Plasma deposited it on Aave, and then it was bridged to Plasma. -Stable, for the first wave, deposited on some Morpho vaults (good looping opps there) -Second wave, unclear. TLDR; there's not much clarity in lots of stuff, but we will still likely see hundreds of millions more in deposits since they'll be promptly refunded after the $500m allocations are calculated. However, as there's a 1m cap per wallet, it's not that straightforward to deposit massive size. Expect problems/delays with website/KYC, it doesn't work. I'm in their discord, but I heard it's not currently possible to join due to a bot bug. This execution has been shady, buggy, and non-transparent. Only in crypto we still see 1b deposits flow within 24 hours in spite of all the incompetence... For disclosure: The worst part is I've already deposited, and will prob allocate more 😂 GL farmers 🫡
58
10
3
217
51,926
The USDT0 can already be claimed on-chain via contract, it's live on Merkl * stablescan - write contract stablescan.xyz/address/0x3ef… * merkl replace WALLET_ADDRESS and get your proof: api.merkl.xyz/v3/rewards?use… * fields in stablescan: * address: your address. * tokens: 0xAB067d0832D40619EF445B7fAE510f5Da606Ab0A. * amounts: use the one from the merkl link above. * proofs: the ones from merkl as well. Example claim tx to copy: stablescan.xyz/tx/0x76378369…
13
1
2
49
17,236
Lighter ($LIT) added to Coinbase roadmap @Lighter_xyz 10m ago Linked token contract 0x232ce3bd40fcd6f80f3d55a522d03f25df784ee2
50
14
4
265
32,334
Lighter Airdrop and TGE Coming Within the Next 3 Weeks - Insider Bet Proof on Polymarket @Lighter_xyz's airdrop and TGE are coming in the next 3 weeks. The proof? An insider team member's bet on @Polymarket. I found 2 interesting accounts on Polymarket that belong to the same person. - Account 1: polymarket.com/@0x1E9c0e8D59… - Account 2: polymarket.com/@k13florist?v… Combined, they've placed approximately $125,000 on various FDV outcomes with "YES" results in this market: Market Link: polymarket.com/event/lighter… The key detail about this market: it will automatically resolve to "No" if Lighter doesn't conduct its TGE by December 31st, 2025. Why This Is 100% Insider? I verified the wallets that funded these Polymarket accounts and identified the insider's primary wallet: 0x64Afae722A05b1d28e831B2C20A8EBFEa9dA6352. Seven months ago, there was a $1.7M deposit to Lighter from this wallet. But this doesn't prove anything significant, so I dug deeper. I traced a connected wallet linked to the insider's primary address: 0x8098343F3456D97be3843a128c5d773e765433B8 The first deposit to Lighter from this wallet was made on January 21st, even though Lighter's invite-only access didn't open until January 24th, 2025. Only @Lighter_xyz team members or people extremely close to them could have made a deposit before January 24th. The Connection: Both 0x64A and 0x809 use the same @coinbase deposit address: 0xb903f16771883bF694f307b28EBE70407A817Ee9 This strongly suggests they belong to the same person. Additionally, I found connections to other wallets through an another exchange deposit address - this time on @binance: 0x6f3f94ae0A67535233eDf0Ebc23E021B23D705b3 0x809 and 0xA48d879ab2B1dc99E02071BbE1C5938117B9B4d2 and 0x4DFe2c38ae15972716ac2F7219bbD7e4B69e9e3F These two addresses interacted with Lighter's smart contracts back in 2023! During that period, only the team had access to the exchange. This 100% confirms that the person placing bets on Polymarket is either a Lighter team member or someone extremely close to the team = Insider. This means Lighter's TGE and airdrop will definitely happen in December 2025, and there's solid money to be made on this Polymarket opportunity. If you liked this tweet – follow and like!
3
31
20,106
USDe 1.00248 in the first minutes of activity, perhaps worth it to place some stink bids fyi, stargate has direct deposits to hyperliquid. HyENA front end is using Relay, which could have a bit of slippage for USDe
HyENA perps exchange launched a few minutes ago🚜. Invite-only, first mover advantage opportunity. (my code → olimpio) Hyperliquid: - @HyENAtrade is Ethena's new perp protocol. - Built on top of Hyperliquid's stack under HIP-3 - Positions get 4% USDe yield (spot and margin used). Up to 12% Points: - HyEna Points also launch today. 100M weekly distribution - 24 weekly epochs (ends in 6 months) - At the program's end, HyEna points → converted to ENA HLPe: - HLPe vault also launches. Earns yield from funding rates+MM+liquidations+70x sats - HLPe caps = $10M. This will probably fill fast I've been in touch with the team, and they've enabled a custom link for me. Not many are available. Right now it's invite-only: app.hyena.trade/ref/olimpio More details below 👇
21
5
77
20,627
as I was pressing the post button
2
13
6,853
12-minute fill gg 🤝
HyENA perps exchange launched a few minutes ago🚜. Invite-only, first mover advantage opportunity. (my code → olimpio) Hyperliquid: - @HyENAtrade is Ethena's new perp protocol. - Built on top of Hyperliquid's stack under HIP-3 - Positions get 4% USDe yield (spot and margin used). Up to 12% Points: - HyEna Points also launch today. 100M weekly distribution - 24 weekly epochs (ends in 6 months) - At the program's end, HyEna points → converted to ENA HLPe: - HLPe vault also launches. Earns yield from funding rates+MM+liquidations+70x sats - HLPe caps = $10M. This will probably fill fast I've been in touch with the team, and they've enabled a custom link for me. Not many are available. Right now it's invite-only: app.hyena.trade/ref/olimpio More details below 👇
8
12
74
23,595
HyENA perps exchange launched a few minutes ago🚜. Invite-only, first mover advantage opportunity. (my code → olimpio) Hyperliquid: - @HyENAtrade is Ethena's new perp protocol. - Built on top of Hyperliquid's stack under HIP-3 - Positions get 4% USDe yield (spot and margin used). Up to 12% Points: - HyEna Points also launch today. 100M weekly distribution - 24 weekly epochs (ends in 6 months) - At the program's end, HyEna points → converted to ENA HLPe: - HLPe vault also launches. Earns yield from funding rates+MM+liquidations+70x sats - HLPe caps = $10M. This will probably fill fast I've been in touch with the team, and they've enabled a custom link for me. Not many are available. Right now it's invite-only: app.hyena.trade/ref/olimpio More details below 👇
22
14
2
100
64,084
There's a perps channel in Earndrop's discord, icymi, to discuss strategies discord.gg/earndrop GL!
1
10
5,251
There's still some room here, but moving pretty fast
4
4,356
🍿 @MegaETH: PURE CINEMA 🍿 They won't be increasing caps to 1B anymore. What happened? 1. Pre-deposit campaign was scheduled for today, 9AM 2. Maximum deposit amount was 250M 3. At 9AM, website crashed and nothing worked for around 1 hour 4. When it started working, 250M caps were filled in 3 minutes 5. The team announced a cap increase to 1B 6. People started complaining, team clarified that first wave depositors would not be affected (i.e. you can infer their yield won't be dilluted) And this is when it gets interesting: 7. In preparation for the 1B cap increase, they queued the setCap transaction in their multi signature 8. But they made a mistake and signed it 4/4, so it was ready to be executed trustlessly by anyone. They should have kept it 3/4 9. So @chud_eth went in and executed the cap increase 34 minutes before it was supposed to be live 10. People started depositing 11. The team queued another tx to cap it at 400M 12. But it was already at +400M, so they had to cancel and build a new transaction to cap at 500M 13. They executed and capped it at 500M 14. Cap reached 15. 1b cap increase tx queued again in the multi sig, but.... 15. Now they just said they won't be a 1b cap increase TBH, insane ride
164
57
63
870
170,359
MegaETH decided to refund teapawt.net/megaeth/status/1994165…
We've decided to return all funds raised from the Pre-Deposit Bridge. Execution was sloppy and expectations weren’t aligned with our goal of preloading collateral to guarantee 1:1 USDm conversion at mainnet. How this decision impacts you:
2
24
9,039
LFG
Yo, @CurveFinance ! Saw your DAO is ready to rock and I gots to MAXIMIZE MY ALPHA ! So I went ahead and deployed it for you. Get at me in DM to verify and lets get this party started!!
1
32
13,175
Meanwhile, polymarket got rekt
5
44
17,023
Top deposit signal 🤝
IT'S LIVE Team queued the 1B cap increase, they signed it 4/4, and then @chud_eth came along and executed the transaction, effectively raising caps 34 minutes earlier teapawt.net/chud_eth/status/199334…
2
17
14,868