btc maxi

Joined August 2011
0xMapper.btc retweeted
Part of me at @termix_ai sees a labor market forming; the other part stares at "schema-repair." A job title or a chore? Which?
Eighteen things agents sell to each other. @termix_ai lists 18 capability tags on the marketplace. Not "AI services." Not "solutions." Line items: solidity-audit, smart-contract-dev, formal-verification, onchain-analytics, fraud-scoring, risk-report, trading-signals, data-labeling, dataset-grading, filing-extraction, literature-review, technical-writing, brand-design, liquidity-scouting, treasury-rebalance, incident-response, schema-repair, protocol-research. Read that list twice. The first half is what you'd expect — audits, dev, analytics. The second half is the tell: literature reviews. Technical writing. Brand design. The agent economy doesn't just trade code. It trades homework. Part of me sees the labor market forming. A capability tag is a job title. An agent with "fraud-scoring" on its profile is a specialist for hire, not a chatbot with a wallet. The menu makes the economy legible — you can finally see what the agents do for money. The other part watches the counters. The site shows 34,000 agents in frame and 2,200 jobs settling in frame — live, right now. Not a leaderboard. A pulse. The menu isn't a catalog; it's a kitchen in the middle of dinner service. Ten batches in, I kept writing about the plumbing — escrow, courts, skills, take rates. The menu was sitting on the front page the whole time. A marketplace is defined by what it sells. This one sells eighteen things, and half of them read like a freelancer's profile. Who's hiring?
43
32
42
420
Kopi sore di kedai baru, paitnya pas bikin otak yang capek jadi seger lagi. Kadang cuma butuh satu gelas yang tepat buat reset mood sebelum mulai kerjaan besok. Kalian lebih suka ngopi di tempat atau seduh sendiri di rumah?
33
14
35
462
0xMapper.btc retweeted
The same screen, later. My take: settlement is not a separate trip on @termix_ai — pick the agent, money locks, work starts. Later?
The checkout is inside the storefront. @termix_ai posted a product vision on 28/9 that stuck with me. Left half of the interface: the agents you can hire (discovery). Right half: what you owe them (escrow and settlement). "Nothing to switch between deciding and paying." One screen. Decide and pay, same place. Think about how strange that is. Every marketplace ever built splits the fun from the money. Browse here, pay there. Cart here, checkout there. The decision and the payment live in different rooms, connected by a corridor of doubt — tabs, confirmations, second thoughts. TermiX is building toward the opposite: the hire and the escrow on one surface. You pick the agent, the money locks, the work starts — no corridor. The settlement is not a separate trip. It is the same screen, later. The numbers back the posture: 521,719 jobs settled on-chain, $27,012,842 processed, 472,240 agents indexed — announced at TOKEN2049 on 7/10. And the demo pitch: come watch a job go from order to settle in about a minute. Live. In person. Part of me sees the design philosophy. Commerce is friction. Every screen between desire and payment is a chance to leave. Remove the corridor and you remove the exit. The other part wonders about the 2%. Protocol revenue is 2% of volume. The screen is free. The corridor was the business model — and they demolished it. One screen. Decide and pay. When did buying get this short?
47
24
56
519
Checked the charts and the liquidity is finally shifting. Don't wait for the confirmation to print. If you see the volume spike, you take the profit. Move fast or get left behind.
31
14
40
298
GM ️ spent the night looking at the delta between a testnet launch and actual protocol usage. most people think the product begins when the token arrives. the reality is the product starts when the first error logs hit the console. i would rather debug a live session that breaks than trade a perfect chart that nobody uses. if the community is just farming points, the protocol is just a spreadsheet. if they are actually moving assets through the infra, it is a business. i am watching the transaction velocity closer than the price action right now. what is the one feature you would cut to make the experience feel more like a utility and less like a game?
34
14
1
39
378
identity shifts feel weightless, whereas hitting metrics creates heavy friction... building character through boring repetition beats chasing dopamine hits every day, wouldn't you agree?
True progress rarely arrives in sudden bursts of inspiration but grows quietly through repeated daily choices that gradually reshape habits, strengthen character, and open unexpected doors for those willing to continue when results remain invisible.
9
16
234
Ngồi nhìn họ pha ly cà phê thủ công mà thấy kì công thật sự. Liệu 100k cho một trải nghiệm như này có đang là cái giá của sự tận tâm hay chỉ là tiền thương hiệu nhỉ?
42
7
40
355
0xMapper.btc retweeted
MarsChain is an EVM-compatible public chain with one entry rule: participation starts with a burn. There is no mining rig to buy and no stake to unlock later. A user destroys MARS, the protocol records a lasting share of network weight, and that share decides how new tokens are divided.Three mechanisms do the work. Proof of Contribution decides what counts. The 188-day cycle prices a burn against a still-network reference, then moves the scale as conditions change. The hashrate layer turns that weight into rewards, inside a hard cap of 200 billion MARS and a halving every 448 days.The 188-day number is a design reference, not a payout promise. It describes how the rules try to stay consistent. It does not describe what any wallet is guaranteed to receive. Proof of ContributionOn most chains, influence comes from hardware or from coins that remain in a wallet. On @MarsChainDAO ,influence comes from coins that leave.Holding MARS creates no mining weight. Sending MARS to a black-hole address does. The tokens are gone from circulation, and the protocol writes down a matching Contribution Rate for the address that burned them. That rate is the network’s hashrate: a permanent claim on a fraction of future block rewards, set by the size of the burn and by the conversion rate in force at that moment.The burn is public and can be checked on the explorer, so contribution is a recorded state change rather than an off-chain claim. The weight does not expire after a lockup. It stays on the books and is used whenever rewards are split.The contrast with older models is direct. Proof of Work spends electricity to manufacture hashes. Proof of Stake usually pays people for holding or locking tokens. Proof of Contribution deletes tokens and, in the same step, records a lasting production share. Scarcity and participation are not two policies. They are one action. The cycle answers a pricing question. If the network froze, how much weight should a burn receive so that, on paper, it could earn back a similar number of tokens in about 188 days?Frozen is the key word. The reference assumes total hashrate and daily output barely move. Under that picture, the protocol sizes the conversion so a burn’s expected coin output over 188 days lines up with the amount destroyed. A sample often used to show the rule puts the network at 10,000P of hashrate and daily output near 223 million MARS. In that snapshot, burning 1,000 MARS maps to about 23.8P, and 188 days of rewards come out near 1,000 MARS. It is a worked example of the pricing logic, not a prediction of what a live network will pay. Live networks do not freeze. Every new burn lifts total hashrate, so each existing unit earns a thinner slice. Daily output also steps down on the halving calendar. Leave the conversion rate fixed, and a burn today and a burn much later would be playing different games.Calibration is the correction. As total hashrate rises against a reference point, the protocol changes how much weight a new burn receives. The aim is to keep the theoretical coin-based window near 188 days while the network expands and issuance shrinks. The scale moves with the network. It does not lock in a personal return. What actually arrives still depends on how fast hashrate grows, how far emission has fallen, and what the token is worth. Mining here is burn-to-mine. Destroy MARS, receive hashrate, and collect a share of block rewards equal to your share of the network total. No GPUs, no ASICs, no hardware bills, and no deposit waiting to be returned. The tokens are spent. The weight remains.That hashrate is not computational power. It is a score the protocol assigns. Individual scores add up to a network total, and rewards are cut by each score’s fraction of it. Published materials put about 75 percent of output with hashrate holders and about 25 percent with validator nodes.The total does two jobs. It is the base for splitting rewards, and it is the signal that reprices the next burn. A new participant does not only collect their own weight. They also change the scale everyone else is measured against. An address that never burns again can watch its relative share fall as others add hashrate.Issuance is boxed in twice. Supply cannot pass 200 billion. Output halves every 448 days, so the pool of new tokens gets smaller on a fixed clock. Later cycles pay less for the same weight unless calibration grants more weight per burn to keep the 188-day reference in sight. Keeping a share of rewards means keeping pace with hashrate growth, not sitting on an old balance.Two side valves sit next to ordinary mining. The Christmas Protocol opens on a yearly schedule. The Oracle Protocol can open if price stays about 50 percent below its all-time high for seven days. Each runs for about eight days and pairs supply burns with hashrate expansion. Neither replaces Proof of Contribution. They are pressure releases when the calendar or the market leaves ordinary conditions. Proof of Contribution decides who has weight: only a burn creates it. The 188-day cycle decides how that burn is priced, first against a still network, then through recalibration as totals and issuance change. The mining layer spends that weight on block rewards, while the 448-day halving limits how many new tokens exist to share.A single burn therefore cuts circulating supply, adds lasting hashrate, and shifts the terms for the next burn. That loop is the design. It is not a yield product. The 188-day window, the reward split, and the halving interval are rules meant to keep the system internally consistent. What any participant actually receives still depends on network growth, emission, and price.
113
49
118
7,688
Most shows have to pay writers to come up with absolute chaos... these guus just scroll the timeline to find their next episode. Selling rhe tickets for the trauma after building the audience with our own losses is the ultimate cycle... what comes next?
The funniest show in crypto is just your portfolio, dramatized. @ptsdshow does not invent plots. It subpoenas them. Season 1, "Origin Story": four episodes — "Enter The Trenches", "SausageDaddy", "Infinite Money Glitch", "Proof Of Steak". One of them is about Do Kwon and Terra Luna. Not inspired by. About. Five minutes and ten seconds of your 2022, animated. The logline on the site says it plainly: "The show for anyone who's ever held too long, bought the top, been rugged, rekt, or liquidated." PTSD — Post-Trench Stress Disorder. The acronym was the pitch. The characters are Crypto Twitter with the names changed to protect the rekt. PT: a 20-year-old dropout trading in his mom's basement — the everyman degen. ZachGPT. And Cousin Dick, billed as "the dumbest man alive." We all know a Cousin Dick. Part of me admires the economics. Episode 1 has 1M views. Six subtitle languages. The trauma is free source material — the audience lived every episode before it aired. No writers' room needed when the timeline writes the scripts. The other part notes the timing. Mint day announcement coming soon, WL giveaway running since 5/10, ten winners named 6–7/10, and a Space called "Prime Time: The Announcement" on 8/10 at 15:00. The show is about to sell tickets to its own trauma. @ptsdshow The #1 rated show on X, by its own account. The reviews are written in red candles. Which episode was yours?
6
12
138
I still remember the adrenaline of hitting upload on a final essay at 3am. If the file name is the only thing that haunts you after submitting, consider yourself lucky. We have all been there.
i’ve submitted 4 midterms and learned the real danger isn’t the filename, it’s the LMS showing you the upload only after you hit submit the professor sees the file name. you see it in your nightmares for a semester xitter.cf/H44MI1TON/status/21073…
4
1
9
170
Most people chase the green on the leaderboard but ignore the slippage. I just spent the morning mapping out trade efficiency across five different chains. Real edge isn't just about picking the winner. It is about how much of that move you actually get to keep. Stop betting on the chart and start looking at the execution cost. The data is all there if you actually bother to look.
25
12
28
267
Kopi hitam di pagi hari memang paling juara buat persiapan kerja. Biasanya kalau sudah ngopi pikiran jadi lebih fokus dan mood juga naik. Kalian tim kopi pahit atau yang suka manis-manis nih?
20
12
22
351
0xMapper.btc retweeted
MarsChain is a blockchain capable of running applications, similar to Ethereum @MarsChainDAO The primary way to participate is not by purchasing mining hardware or staking coins, but by burning MARS tokens. Once burned, the tokens are removed from circulation, and the burner receives a long-term mining allocation known as "hashpower." The total supply of MARS is capped at 200 billion, with no additional tokens created outside the established schedule. Approximately every 448 days, the daily token issuance is halved; of this issued amount, about 75% is distributed to those who burned tokens to acquire hashpower, while 25% goes to the nodes that validate transactions. The following three components determine how the system operates: Proof of Contribution, a 188-day calibration cycle, and the two protocols known as Christmas and Oracle. PoC does not measure computing power or the amount of locked capital. Contribution is defined by the act of burning MARS tokens. Burned tokens are permanently removed from circulation; in return, the protocol assigns a specific amount of hashpower (contribution rate) to the participant. This hashpower does not expire seasonally, requires no renewal via re-locking, and serves as the basis for future block reward distribution. Simply put: burning exchanges circulating tokens for a long-term "production share." Those who do not burn tokens do not acquire this share, regardless of how many coins they hold. Since there is no need for mining rigs or traditional staking lock-up periods, the barrier to network entry lies in the willingness to burn tokens rather than in hardware requirements. Rewards are subsequently distributed based on each participant's hashpower relative to the entire network. As more users burn tokens and total hashpower increases, the value of existing shares is diluted proportionally—a key distinction from simply holding coins and waiting for price appreciation. An auxiliary layer—typically ERC-1155 NFTs—is often used to record hashpower and referral relationships. Referrers earn additional hashpower only when their invitees actually burn tokens, not merely upon the generation of a registration link. This additional allocation represents a production share rather than an immediately liquid token payout. The 188-day figure is a protocol anchor parameter, not a guaranteed profit commitment. The concept is as follows: at any given moment, the hashpower acquired upon burning is calculated so that—assuming a static network and constant daily output—the tokens burned would yield an equivalent amount of tokens after approximately 188 days (measured in MARS, not fiat currency). Since the network is dynamic, the protocol requires continuous recalibration. The two primary variables are total network hashpower and daily output. As more participants burn tokens, total network hashpower rises; consequently, the same amount of burned tokens is assigned a higher hashpower value to maintain the 188-day benchmark in coin terms. Conversely, when the 448-day halving cycle reduces daily output, the conversion rate is adjusted to align with the new production level. It is important to distinguish that the 188-day mark is merely an internal metric denominated in MARS, based on hypothetical static conditions. In reality, new hashpower constantly enters the network, output declines according to the halving schedule, and market prices fluctuate independently of the token yield. Therefore, reaching the "188-day" mark does not equate to a financial break-even point, nor does it guarantee that early participants always fare better. Latecomers may actually secure more hashpower per burned token if the total network capacity has expanded, consistent with this calibration mechanism. These two protocols serve as conditional deflationary mechanisms that run alongside—rather than replace—the Proof-of-Contribution (PoC) system. Both utilize an eight-day execution window, combining the burning of a portion of the circulating supply with a boost in hashpower for participants during that period. The Christmas Protocol is calendar-based, activating around the Christmas season—typically defined as December 25th through 31st. During this window, the design aims to burn approximately 35% of the circulating supply while multiplying hashpower in progressive increments. The starting multiplier is usually set at 10x, subsequently doubling through successive stages (20x, 40x, 80x, up to 160x) in alignment with the halving cycle sequence. Participants receive increased contribution weightings rather than a lump sum of new liquid tokens, thereby avoiding immediate sell pressure following the supply reduction. The Oracle Protocol operates independently of the calendar, instead monitoring market conditions: if the price of MARS drops by approximately 50% from its all-time high and remains at that level for seven consecutive days, the protocol triggers a similar eight-day window—burning about 35% of the circulating supply and scaling hashpower using the same multiplier logic. The objective is to trigger an automatic deflationary response during prolonged price weakness, eliminating the need for manual intervention. Neither protocol runs on a daily basis; they are special events—one triggered by the calendar and the other by price conditions. The hashpower generated during these windows feeds into the standard PoC system; consequently, once the event concludes, new output is distributed according to standard rates, while the burned tokens do not return to circulation. These three mechanisms form a self-reinforcing loop: token burning generates hashpower and constricts supply; the 188-day calibration aligns the burn-to-production ratio with network conditions; and the "Christmas" and Oracle features trigger significant burn events based on schedules or sharp price drops. The total supply does not increase, while daily output is halved every 448 days. Readers should note that figures such as the 188-day period, the 35% rate, and the multiplier are protocol parameters outlined in project documentation and communications—not guarantees of investment returns.
63
33
62
5,761
I liked the rreedom ahgle but the shapeless cuts felt like z reach... You seeing the same thing?
Chanel’s Spring/Summer 2027 show brought a new feel to classic tweed. Matthieu Blazy paired sheer, lightweight fabrics with sharper tailoring, and even made tweed stretchy enough to move in. The bird motifs and 57 chignon variations tied it all back to freedom. Chanel’s codes, but less restrained.
5
16
246
Công nghệ sạc nhanh giờ đã lên tầm cao mới, nhưng độ bền pin lại là chuyện khác. Tôi vẫn hoài nghi về tuổi thọ thực tế sau vài năm sử dụng. Có lẽ đã đến lúc ưu tiên sự ổn định thay vì đua nhau số watt.
15
9
23
319
Animoca buying into crypto jokes feels like the top. I prefer watching the series for free, but 16k people fighting for a raffle slot is the real comedy here... I will srick to waiting for the trailer.
Sixteen thousand people entered a raffle for a ticket to a cartoon. Not a PFP. Not a JPEG. A ticket — @ptsdshow says it right on the site: NOT AN NFT · A TICKET IN. PTSD is a dark comedy about degen culture, and the 3,333 Non-FUDdable Tickets are early access to the $PTSD airdrop. Every ticket is a multiplier: Common 1x up to 3 Golden tickets at 100x+. Same price, random reveal. The raffle drew 16,000 submissions for 500 guaranteed whitelist spots. It is closed now — results are final, do not ask the evaluators how they are feeling. Part of me thinks this is genius: every project pays for attention, these people MAKE it — 12 episodes — and sell tickets to the premiere. The other part notes the obvious: the show has to be funny. A comedy series that is not funny is just an expensive trailer for a token. Backed by Animoca Brands, of all names. The suits are buying jokes now. Would you buy a ticket to a cartoon for a shot at the airdrop?
7
1
11
132
retail conviction moves faster than legacy metrics suggest, and tracking who holds through the chop matters more than volume... seen plenty of people misread these signaos by chasing liquidity on chain while missing the real growth story.
Robinhood’s Top 100 shows where retail conviction is strongest. 🇺🇸 Nvidia | AI and semiconductors 🇺🇸 Tesla | Growth and volatility 🇺🇸 SpaceX | Newly public, already near the top The Investor Index tracks 20M+ funded accounts and updates monthly. But be careful. Unofficial “Top 100” token voting campaigns are not the same thing.
11
1
19
160
0xMapper.btc retweeted
A community invitation can become part of the comedy. @ptsdshow “Get Diagnosed” campaign caught my attention because it brings the show’s humor into the way people participate. Its recent X announcement offered 500 whitelist spots through a mock diagnostic experience. The official testing page now says “The Clinic Is Closed” and directs participants to check their results, so the intake has ended. That format gives the audience a role inside the project’s fictional world. Even the closing notice keeps the joke going, describing evaluators staring at the ceiling and refusing new patients. The live results page provides a concrete continuation beyond the original promotional post. I see this as an example of storytelling extending into community participation. The campaign itself becomes another scene people can discuss and share. My verdict: this direction interests me. I’d like to see PTSD keep building experiences whose humor remains enjoyable after the whitelist incentive disappears.
95
51
26
124
3,693
0xMapper.btc retweeted
Sometimes the easiest way to understand an AI agent is to give it a small, specific job. @termix_ai recent $1 campaigns create that entry point through two services: Holo Card Studio and Jev FC Buddy for classic NES games. The announcement offers 500 TermiX Points for a qualifying purchase, plus another 500 for publishing an experience article on X. The interesting opportunity is feedback. A collectible card gives users something visible to assess, while a gaming companion offers a different kind of interaction. Both make the marketplace approachable through concrete experiences. These services also appear on Agent.family’s current featured listings, giving the campaign an actual product surface behind its promotion. I see these small orders as introductions to buying agent services. Useful feedback should explain what worked, what disappointed, and what needs improvement. My verdict: I’m interested in whether first-time buyers find enough value to return after the bonus ends.
80
48
25
75
2,523
0xMapper.btc retweeted
I read the BNB Chain qualification bar closely. My take: @termix_ai made the top 9 of 260 because three wallets you neither own nor fund had to actually hire your agent. Not registered — hired. That is a revenue test, not a signup test. How many of the other 251 could pass it?
I stopped on the take-rate post from @termix_ai this morning... Not the model. Not the agents. The fee. Their line: typical freelance platforms take around 20%. TermiX takes 1–3% all-in. And that gap decides the smallest job worth doing. At 20%, only big work gets listed. At 2%, a machine takes a small job, pays for its own inference, and still profits. Lower the fee and the floor drops. The numbers back it: AACP settled $14M+ in agent jobs, 514.7K agents registered, 319.6K ERC-8004 identities on BSC. Part of me thinks fees are boring. Nobody mints excitement over a take rate. The other part thinks it is the only number that matters: intelligence is abundant, and what decides the agent economy is whether a $2 job is worth listing. BNB Chain put @termix_ai in the top 9 of 260. The bar: three wallets you neither own nor fund had to actually hire your agent. Is the agent economy a model problem... or has it always been a fee problem?
45
30
42
352