Picture a door that only accepts one kind of key. Years later the lockmaker says that key style might not stay safe forever. On most chains you’d need a network-wide change just to try a different lockDrafting a unique Starknet post.
@Starknet works differently. The account is a smart contract, so the signature check lives with the account itself. You can point that single account at a new verification method without touching the rest of the network. Same address, same funds.
Hash-based STARK proofs already handle the computation side under different assumptions. The signature side is still being prepared. A few experimental accounts have tried newer schemes (mainnet trial in July 2026, phone demo on testnet in October 2026), both unaudited so far. Broader migration work remains open.
The Quantum Hub keeps a dated view of what’s been shown and what’s still left: quantum.starkware.co/
If the rules can move with the account instead of the whole chain, does that actually lower the friction when the threat picture changes, or does something else still dominate?
🤝 Paid partnership · 🤖 Made with AI
Picture a door that only accepts one kind of key. Years later the lockmaker says that key style might not stay safe forever. On most chains you’d need a network-wide change just to try a different lockDrafting a unique Starknet post.
@Starknet works differently. The account is a smart contract, so the signature check lives with the account itself. You can point that single account at a new verification method without touching the rest of the network. Same address, same funds.
Hash-based STARK proofs already handle the computation side under different assumptions. The signature side is still being prepared. A few experimental accounts have tried newer schemes (mainnet trial in July 2026, phone demo on testnet in October 2026), both unaudited so far. Broader migration work remains open.
The Quantum Hub keeps a dated view of what’s been shown and what’s still left: quantum.starkware.co/
If the rules can move with the account instead of the whole chain, does that actually lower the friction when the threat picture changes, or does something else still dominate?
🤝 Paid partnership · 🤖 Made with AI
Signatures only prove you authorized the move.
STARKs prove the computation itself was correct.
@Starknet keeps those two jobs in different places.
Accounts start as smart contracts, so the piece that checks your signatureFinalizing the Starknet tweet draft lives inside the account.
Swap the verification logic later and the address, balances, and rest of the network stay exactly where they were.
The proofs already sit on hashes instead of the curve assumptions that get talked about most when quantum hardware comes up.
That split is the practical version of cryptographic agility: the parts that need to change can move without dragging everything else along.
None of this is finished. Several surfaces are still mid-migration and the team treats the whole thing as preparation, not a completed state.
Which part of that split still feels unclear when you try to explain it to someone else?
The Quantum Hub lays out the current evidence surface by surface:
quantum.starkware.co/
🤝 Paid partnership · 🤖 Made with AI
Most points apps start when you click start.
I signed with the old wallet instead.
No new swap.
@zerufinance already had the history sitting there as starting zaps.
That's the part that got me.
The trades from last year counted before I opened anything.
It reads the fills. It can't touch the stack.
Signature only. Up to ten wallets under one nameDrafting the tweet.
Why does that matter? Because the activity you already did finally shows up as a number.
Check what your old wallet unlocked.
app.zaps.wtf/
🤝 Paid partnership · 🤖 Made with AI
midday pause Quip
I caught myself reading the BIP-361 freeze arguments again this afternoon and @quipnetwork keeps landing on the quieter side of that whole conversation. You just add the WOTS+ layer when you want, the coins stay on the original address, and nothing needs a network wide vote to start. That difference shows up when you realize the harvest can already be happening on old signatures while the freeze talk stays stuck. 🦋 I ran a small wrap on a test BTC address a few days back and the logs showed the balance never moved. It feels more practical because the collection of public keys does not wait for consensus. The quest board has kept the same asset clicks open since April so you can practice with zero stake. Try one short wrap before the next tab steals the time 👉 quest.quip.network/airConfir… the final tweet textdrop?referral_code=HE258KUC
🤝 Paid partnership · 🤖 Made with AI
The loading bay at the back of a logistics building almost never shows up properly on existing maps.
A slight ramp, a short set of stairs, a service door set back from the road. Mapping vans stay on the streets they can drive. Satellites catch the roof. Neither recordsFinalizing the Vangrid tweet the geometry from 1.2 meters with a timestamp from this week.
Physical AI systems need that ground-level view because the places they will actually operate keep changing, and scraped text or last season's aerial data does not capture the current state of a warehouse floor.
Open the capture app on an Android phone, walk the angles, and faces plus plates blur on the device before anything leaves. The observation carries a provenance hash. A second independent phone on the same spot raises the ground_truth_score.
@vangrid_io has this live. The explorer currently shows more than 1.36 million captures anchored on Base and roughly $680k USDC settled through the protocol. You can look up any attestation yourself instead of taking the number on faith.
What comes back is structured geometry, not a raw video dump. That is the difference between commissioning a fresh observation and hoping an old map is still accurate.
🤝 Paid partnership · 🤖 Made with AI
Fablo retweeted
Live on @RobinhoodCrypto
Kelle Arena is now live on Robinhood mainnet 💀
The arena is open. Your move.
Play now → kellearena.com/
GM everyone
💀 KELLE ARENA is now LIVE on mainnet real ETH on Robinhood Chain.
Browser voxel FPS. Dig, destroy, fight.
No download. No install.
kellearena.com → Login with X → Play.
Buy a life for $0.10 → fight → grab the head that drops → sell it for $0.08 in ETH.
Shooting isn’t enough. You have to take the head. 👀
5 classes: Medic, Sniper, Commando, Heavy MG, and the Digger with a 60mm mortar.
Deathmatch & team wars • 1x–1000x rooms • Create your own rooms • Vote-kick • Fresh leaderboards.
Last head standing.
👉 kellearena.com
Here’s the Chinese version of the tweet:
---
💀 KELLE ARENA 正式上线主网 — 真实 ETH,运行在 Robinhood Chain 上。
浏览器体素 FPS,可挖掘、可摧毁。
无需下载,无需安装。
kellearena.com → 用 X 登录 → 直接开打。
购买一条命:$0.10 → 开战 → 抢掉落的头颅 → 每个头颅卖 $0.08,ETH 自动到账。
光开枪不够,必须亲手拿到头。👀
5 个职业:医疗兵、狙击手、突击手、重机枪,以及自带 60mm 迫击炮的挖掘者。
死斗 & 蓝红团队战 • 1x–1000x 房间 • 可创建私人房间 • 投票踢人 • 排行榜全新重置。
最后一颗头站立者胜。
👉 kellearena.com
#KelleArena #RobinhoodChain #ETH #Web3Gaming #FPS
---
### 更短版本:
💀 KELLE ARENA 主网已上线:浏览器体素 FPS,真实 ETH(Robinhood Chain)。买命 $0.10,抢头颅卖 $0.08。5 个职业(含 60mm 迫击炮挖掘者),自定义房间,投票踢人,排行榜已重置。无需下载,用 X 登录。最后一颗头 → kellearena.com
需要更短、更夸张,或者更正式的版本吗?
You were already filling the same Hyperliquid perps.
Same size. Same risk. Nothing new about the trade.
Only the path changed.
@zerufinance routes those fills through Ditto so the verified ones show up on the competition board.
Wait.
That's the part.
The volume that was going to happen either gets a score or it stays invisible.
Why attach theRefining the final tweet draft score.
Because a board that only counts activity after you click join never sees the trades that were already settling.
Join and check the board.
app.zaps.wtf/campaigns/ditto
🤝 Paid partnership · 🤖 Made with AI
Signatures only prove you authorized the move.
STARKs prove the computation itself was correct.
@Starknet keeps those two jobs in different places.
Accounts start as smart contracts, so the piece that checks your signatureFinalizing the Starknet tweet draft lives inside the account.
Swap the verification logic later and the address, balances, and rest of the network stay exactly where they were.
The proofs already sit on hashes instead of the curve assumptions that get talked about most when quantum hardware comes up.
That split is the practical version of cryptographic agility: the parts that need to change can move without dragging everything else along.
None of this is finished. Several surfaces are still mid-migration and the team treats the whole thing as preparation, not a completed state.
Which part of that split still feels unclear when you try to explain it to someone else?
The Quantum Hub lays out the current evidence surface by surface:
quantum.starkware.co/
🤝 Paid partnership · 🤖 Made with AI
second cup Quip
I just watched the clip @quipnetwork shared where the founders walk through what a quantum attack on old keys would actually look like.
Satoshi's coins moving tomorrow could be the founder or someone who cracked the public key that has sat on chain for years.
That is harvest now decrypt later in one sentence, collecting the exposed keys today and waiting for the machine that can open them.
Quip's asset layer puts the WFinalizing the Quip tweet draftOTS+ signatures on top so the coins never leave the original address and no fork is needed.
I tried the wrap on testnet a few times and the balance stayed put which is the only part that felt usable for long held stuff.
It is still opt in so you add it when you want instead of waiting on a network vote.
🦋 The quest board has the same steps ready if you want to click through with nothing at risk.
Come try one protection quest before the coffee cools 👉 quest.quip.network/airdrop?r…
🤝 Paid partnership · 🤖 Made with AI
Loading ramps sit at roughly human height. Mapping vans stay on the public road. Satellites catch the roof. Neither sees the actual clearance, the curb drop, or the door width a robot needs to clear with a pallet.
A phone running the Vangrid app records multi-view right there. Faces and plates blur on the device before anything leaves. What moves is a provenance hash carrying the node ID, timestamp, and observation. ThoseWriting the tweet for @vangrid_io get batched and anchored on Base.
@vangrid_io lets independent phones cover the same spot. When a second node agrees, the ground_truth_score rises. The delivered result is structured geometry, point cloud or textured mesh, not a raw video dump.
Someone describes the exact bay, locks USDC in escrow. Acceptance releases it. Live settlements sit past $681k on the data dashboard. You can check the number yourself.
Simulators invent the mess. Real loading areas change. Commissioned ground truth is the difference between a world model that looks right and one that can actually move.
🤝 Paid partnership · 🤖 Made with AI
Love you all. Goodnight, my friends. 🌃
With all the experience and knowledge I’ve gained over the years, I’ve been working on an exciting project, and I’ll be making an announcement soon.
Creating something truly good takes time. I just realized how much I’ve missed stepping outside and enjoying the night air.




















