The Dáil is set to consider the Electricity Regulation (Removal of Nuclear Fission Prohibitions) Bill 2026 potentially ending Ireland's 25 year ban on nuclear power.
With grid demand nearing capacity and electricity bills increasing, the case for SMRs has never been stronger.
18for0 retweeted
Belgium is reversing course on nuclear.
Decommissioning has been halted.
The government has signed a letter of intent with Engie for a full state takeover of the nuclear fleet.
For years, Belgium followed the green script. They shut reliable nuclear. Bet on weather-dependent power. And increased reliance on imports.
Now reality has intervened.
Prime Minister Bart De Wever says Belgium wants safe, affordable, sustainable energy with less dependence on foreign supply -- which raises the obvious question, why was that not Belgium's policy all along?
Nuclear was always the sane option. Dense power. Low carbon. Dispatchable. Domestic control. It works when wind drops. It works when the sun sets. It works when gas prices spike.
Belgium is not "transitioning." It is backing away from a big mistake. Europe, it appears, is finally waking up to the green folly.
18for0 retweeted
The Darlington SMR Project now has an official estimated LCOE of ~€95/MWh for four BWRX-300s
When I last wrote about the four BWRX-300 reactors being built at Darlington, Ontario Power Generation (OPG) had not disclosed the expected LCOE for the project. That number has now been made public by OPG in a answer to the Ontario Energy Board.
OPG projects an average LCOE of C$149/MWh in 2024 dollars, equivalent to around €95/MWh in 2025 euros, across the full four-reactor project. Unit 1 is planned to enter service in 2030, with all four units expected to be in operation by 2035.
This is particularly interesting in the context of the construction costs I looked at in my previous post. After adjusting OPG’s headline project budget for escalation and interest during construction, I estimated an average overnight construction cost of around €8,200/kW across the four units in 2025 euros. The estimated OCC declined significantly through the build programme, from around €10,700/kW for Unit 1 to €6,900/kW for Unit 4.
The €95/MWh is therefore an average that includes the first-of-a-kind (FOAK) BWRX-300 together with the three subsequent units benefiting from repetition, shared infrastructure and learning. OPG has not published individual LCOEs for the four reactors, but the substantial decline in capital cost towards Unit 4 would, all else equal, also be expected to translate into a lower LCOE for the later units.
There is of course still uncertainty around the estimate. Unit 1 and the shared infrastructure have reached OPG’s Release Quality Estimate (RQE), based on a Class 3 cost estimate, while Units 2-4 are currently based on Class 4 estimates and will be refined as engineering progresses and experience from Unit 1 is incorporated.
So €95/MWh should not be read as a final realised cost, but it is a useful real-world benchmark for a four-unit SMR project already under construction, and one that already includes the FOAK reactor.
There are currently ~40 BWRX-300s under order in Europe.
@gvhnuclear CEO "A standard design, combined with a predictable and efficient regulatory environment, allows us to apply common technology, licensing experience and supply chain capabilities".
All of this reducing cost.
Apologies that should say planned not under order.
world-nuclear-news.org/artic…
There's so many parallels with Ireland, linked below.
"The (Italian) government aims to deploy advanced modular reactors to help decarbonise industry and strengthen energy security, arguing that technological and safety advances have rendered the 1987 anti-nuclear vote obsolete"
Irelands nuclear ban now puts us at odds with the European Commission
@vonderleyen, "we need to double down on our affordable homegrown clean energy, be it renewables or nuclear, biomethane or other, technologically neutral"
Is it time Ireland went technologically neutral too
Ireland is not the only EU country about to vote on removing a nuclear power ban.
We are in the midst of an energy and climate crisis. It makes no sense to disregard nuclear, the EU largest clean energy source.
politico.eu/article/italy-nu…
Sweden to build a GE Hitachi SMR plant by mid 2030s. One of these plants would meet around 30% of our current electricity needs.
This demonstrates that a 2040 completion date is achievable for Ireland, given an extra five years for legislation adoption and regulator setup.
Another successful EP at the @GlobalGreenatEp 🎉🎉 plenty of interesting conversations around nuclear and just a great bit of craic too.
Thanks to Global Green for having us back, the 18for0 volunteers giving up there weekend to help out and everyone who stopped by for a chat.
There have been a number of articles stating that Ireland needs nuclear because we have too many data centres.
Let's be honest with the public, even if Ireland didn't have any data centres we still could not power the country on wind and solar alone.
euronews.com/my-europe/2026/…
Short answer, the IAEA and us at 18for0 say 10-15 years, while others say ~20 years.
Either way if we don't start the process it will never happen.
Nuclear reduces electricity costs, generates baseload power to keep the lights on and removes the need for gas and oil generators
It time for @EPfestival again 🎉🎉
You will be able to find us there at the @GlobalGreenatEp.
Looking forward to seeing you all there.
Find out details on the link below.
electricpicnic.ie/explore/gl…


















