Kinda brilliant
Watching The Wire, I realized that if Jesus was born today, he wouldnβt be anything like we imagine Jesus to be.
The Jesus of today would be a psychopath. But not the clichΓ©, garden variety, power-hungry executive. He would be someone capable of winning at that game, but he wouldnβt be playing it.
Think of it this way. In the game of power, morality is a liability. If you deviate from The Game, you get outplayed by someone who doesnβt. Itβs bound to happen. In the show, this archetype is represented by Marlo β the apex predator who takes no chances. The embodiment of The Game itself.
If you do play the game of power, you become one of the players. But you canβt transcend systems by perpetuating them. You must invent another game: another evolutionarily stable configuration in some ways better than the one youβre replacing. One that favors players other than pure psychopaths. One that is inaccessible to them.
Have you ever wondered how games emerge? Iβm not talking about just table games or video games. Iβm rather pointing at complex systems with gravitational wells, where vibrant patterns establish and reinforce themselves. These vortexes of time-space that organize reality around them, making it seem like certain events βwantβ to happen. The whole category.
These games are rarely architected. Every actor appears to be pursuing their local incentives, as always. The difference is what theyβre chasing. Ultimately, all life is an ecology of games; each a different attractor in the probability space.
Seen from this perspective, the conventional attempts at βsaving the worldβ may seem noble but silly at the same time. Especially when they seek to affect change by optimizing isolated parameters because thatβs just playing the game blind. We canβt transcend systems we donβt understand. We must first understand what creates our current predicament and offer viable alternatives. Thatβs the hard part. Itβs easier to perform charity by supporting what sounds good.
I once saw a tweet saying that βthe meekβ in βthe meek shall inherit the Earthβ originally meant not someone who is weak but rather someone βwho has a sword but chooses not to use itβ. I donβt know if this statement is historically true. But if that book was written today, thatβs what I think it would mean. The meek shall inherit The Game.
This is an almost universal problem living in a world where information is so easy to access.
So many people have awareness of the concepts, but very few have the experience to pin down those ideas in reality
Without the balance of conceptual knowledge and experiential knowledge, they have nothing
βMeaning Crisisβ people are confused. There are two types of meaning: experiential and narrative.
Experiential is the felt sense that life flows with meaning. You get it through consistently sleeping well, exercising, *play*, connecting with loved ones, entering flow, releasing addictions, and meditation. Narrative meaning you get from having a coherent story of your life and why itβs important, goals youβre moving toward, and knowledge of how your life relates to the cosmos.
Almost everyone I meet who is seeking meaning is seeking *narrative* meaning while neglecting experiential meaning. This is backwards. Experiential meaning obviates the need for most types of narrative meaning.
The actual skillset of any mystic should be weighed not by their ability to understand the concepts and symbols.
Drawing a map by itself does nothing
The real skill is finding where to pin it down in reality.
Where can you go when you follow the map you've drawn?
Watching this discourse on the same platform people laud $250,000,000 pay packages over four years for AI researchers literally and actually disgusts me.
The level of disdain for an artist trying to get the bag in this thread is mindboggling.
I wonder what it would look like if every artist simultaneously said:
Hey, fuck you, I won't do that for free? Would the entire world stop consuming art?
Or would artists just be able to live?
Is art important enough, that the race to the bottom would stop?
Looking for a place in SF is wild
Gotta move like a detective not to get your shit stolen by some jabroni
I keep thinking about this and I can't get over how brilliant it is.
Value is an entirely perceptual issue. When a resource is not being used, it sits in a weird value-superposition. Both worthless and worth whatever the consensus is, just collective hallucination based on circumstance.
Nothing is worth anything unless it is being used, actively.
It's so fresh that someone got creative with their footage from this event I put on with @SimularAI
It's so fun bringing some life to these kinds of events.
Pixels After Dark was my favorite event of Tech Week. Machines learning to act, artists making work in the room, and a question I keep returning to: who gets to tell the story?
A field film about community and becoming the author of my own work. @SimularAI










