Aubree (@7HighSeas) header
Aubree (@7HighSeas) profile picture

The ABCs of Election Security✨ Subject Matter Expert 🇺🇸 BIND THE DEEP STATE ✝️ NO RINOS❌️ NO COMMIES ❌️ NO QUARTER ❌️ I was born for the Storm 🏴‍☠️

Joined May 2023
Photo by Aubree (@7HighSeas)Photo by Aubree (@7HighSeas)Photo by Aubree (@7HighSeas)Photo by Aubree (@7HighSeas)Photo by Aubree (@7HighSeas)Photo by Aubree (@7HighSeas)Photo by Aubree (@7HighSeas)Photo by Aubree (@7HighSeas)Photo by Aubree (@7HighSeas)Photo by Aubree (@7HighSeas)
Remember, kids: Those ballots are supposed to be ANONYMOUS so the redaction is CONFIRMATION of ELECTION SECURITY BREACHES at the ADMINISTRATIVE LEVEL. Read more at takingbacktexas.org or tbtr.us
13
19
1
56
19,486
I'm concerned we are going about things the wrong way once again.
27
This is the plan moving forward. I need to raise just $10k to fund this work for the next calendar year, and I am already at $2500! Please help by donating at tbtr.us 🫡🇺🇸 And shop our educational materials! tbtx.substack.com/p/paper-el…
tbtx.substack.com/p/why-voti… My latest report. Thank you for reading and sharing! 🫡🇺🇸
1
1
52
Aubree retweeted
Replying to @CletaMitchell
tbtx.substack.com/p/why-voti… My latest report. Thank you for reading and sharing! 🫡🇺🇸
1
1
6
Reporters are asking me today, "so what's next for election integrity?" Here's the response, to everyone: The integrity of America's elections is vital to our country's future and those of us who live and breathe it are NOT going away! America, roll up your sleeves. The work of securing our elections is FAR from completed! We know – and the American people know – that there are myriad problems in our election systems and that election results for one candidate or political party are not the goal of the @EIwatchdogs The goal is to have honest, transparent, and accurate elections EVERY time, so the people can trust the outcome, regardless of who wins or who loses. Democrats don’t get that. The media doesn’t get that. The focus of the leftist crazies for the last several months was whether President Trump would ‘accept’ the outcome of the elections. What is that even about? When election results are not close….no one looks under the hood. It is only when you have a very close election that people start examining the process and whether there were dead people voting, whether there are votes cast illegally from po boxes or vacant lots….whether the tabulators jammed so that ballots were scanned more than once….whether the printers at the vote centers were working…whether voters had to be sent to a different location….how many people showed up to vote and were told they had ‘already voted…’. And on and on. The work of the Election Integrity Network ElectionIntegrityNetwork.org is needed NOW more than ever. Election integrity cannot wait until the next campaign, the next controversy or the next close race. The rules that govern tomorrow’s elections are being shaped today. Democrats who gained power will pursue election law changes that will put ‘voter convenience’ ahead of secure, accountable and trustworthy elections. Their goal is to model every state’s election laws after California’s. Americans concerned about election integrity need to be ready for that fight in every statehouse, every legislative committee and every county election office. What do you need to do? Watch the proposals in your state legislature. Challenge efforts to weaken voter identification – which was passed overwhelmingly in several ballot questions on Nov. 3, by the way. Demand that voter registration systems verify eligibility and keep accurate rolls. Push back against expanded mail voting and legalized ballot harvesting. Insist on meaningful audits, public transparency and laws that guarantee a fair process. Demand accountability. “Access” should never become an excuse to waive measures to verify eligibility. Who is eligible? How is identity verified? Who handled the ballot? Can the count be checked? Those questions deserve answers, not accusations that asking them is somehow an attack on democracy. Watch efforts to reverse bans on ranked-choice voting. Pay attention to the “democrat” in Democrat Socialists of America. The socialist path does not have to begin with a revolution. It can advance through the ballot box, one majority vote at a time. That is why Americans who oppose socialism must take the fight over election rules seriously. The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is more than an election reform proposal. It is a way to make the nationwide popular vote decisive in choosing the president. This change will put America on a socialist path by way of “democracy”. The Democrat Socialists of America will use fifty-one percent to erase the constitutional rights of the other forty-nine. But outrage alone will secure nothing. Get involved in an Election Integrity Network coalition in your state. Study your state laws. Measure state laws against the principles of the U.S. Citizens Elections Bill of Rights. Identify the gaps. Use the Model Election Laws Handbook to strengthen your state’s election laws. Read the election bills proposed in your state. Show up at hearings. Become a trained poll worker or observer. Demand safeguards that protect eligible citizens’ votes and make the results independently verifiable. Bring evidence. Know the rules well enough to challenge weak answers. Stay involved after the headlines fade. Be right and be polite...but be persistent. Hopelessness is surrender in advance. Every citizen who decides there is no point leaves these decisions to someone else. We need all hands on deck. There is work to do. And the time to do it is now! Today! If not you, then who? The consent of the governed means something only when we the people can trust and verify the process that records our consent. We welcome you to join the ranks of the Election Integrity Network. Let’s start today! @EIwatchdogs @BasedMikeLee @seanmdav @RealAmVoice @Bannons_WarRoom @seanspicer
1
2
74
This is the plan moving forward. I need to raise just $10k to fund this work for the next calendar year, and I am already at $2500! Please help by donating at tbtr.us 🫡🇺🇸 And shop our educational materials! tbtx.substack.com/p/paper-el…
Reporters are asking me today, "so what's next for election integrity?" Here's the response, to everyone: The integrity of America's elections is vital to our country's future and those of us who live and breathe it are NOT going away! America, roll up your sleeves. The work of securing our elections is FAR from completed! We know – and the American people know – that there are myriad problems in our election systems and that election results for one candidate or political party are not the goal of the @EIwatchdogs The goal is to have honest, transparent, and accurate elections EVERY time, so the people can trust the outcome, regardless of who wins or who loses. Democrats don’t get that. The media doesn’t get that. The focus of the leftist crazies for the last several months was whether President Trump would ‘accept’ the outcome of the elections. What is that even about? When election results are not close….no one looks under the hood. It is only when you have a very close election that people start examining the process and whether there were dead people voting, whether there are votes cast illegally from po boxes or vacant lots….whether the tabulators jammed so that ballots were scanned more than once….whether the printers at the vote centers were working…whether voters had to be sent to a different location….how many people showed up to vote and were told they had ‘already voted…’. And on and on. The work of the Election Integrity Network ElectionIntegrityNetwork.org is needed NOW more than ever. Election integrity cannot wait until the next campaign, the next controversy or the next close race. The rules that govern tomorrow’s elections are being shaped today. Democrats who gained power will pursue election law changes that will put ‘voter convenience’ ahead of secure, accountable and trustworthy elections. Their goal is to model every state’s election laws after California’s. Americans concerned about election integrity need to be ready for that fight in every statehouse, every legislative committee and every county election office. What do you need to do? Watch the proposals in your state legislature. Challenge efforts to weaken voter identification – which was passed overwhelmingly in several ballot questions on Nov. 3, by the way. Demand that voter registration systems verify eligibility and keep accurate rolls. Push back against expanded mail voting and legalized ballot harvesting. Insist on meaningful audits, public transparency and laws that guarantee a fair process. Demand accountability. “Access” should never become an excuse to waive measures to verify eligibility. Who is eligible? How is identity verified? Who handled the ballot? Can the count be checked? Those questions deserve answers, not accusations that asking them is somehow an attack on democracy. Watch efforts to reverse bans on ranked-choice voting. Pay attention to the “democrat” in Democrat Socialists of America. The socialist path does not have to begin with a revolution. It can advance through the ballot box, one majority vote at a time. That is why Americans who oppose socialism must take the fight over election rules seriously. The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is more than an election reform proposal. It is a way to make the nationwide popular vote decisive in choosing the president. This change will put America on a socialist path by way of “democracy”. The Democrat Socialists of America will use fifty-one percent to erase the constitutional rights of the other forty-nine. But outrage alone will secure nothing. Get involved in an Election Integrity Network coalition in your state. Study your state laws. Measure state laws against the principles of the U.S. Citizens Elections Bill of Rights. Identify the gaps. Use the Model Election Laws Handbook to strengthen your state’s election laws. Read the election bills proposed in your state. Show up at hearings. Become a trained poll worker or observer. Demand safeguards that protect eligible citizens’ votes and make the results independently verifiable. Bring evidence. Know the rules well enough to challenge weak answers. Stay involved after the headlines fade. Be right and be polite...but be persistent. Hopelessness is surrender in advance. Every citizen who decides there is no point leaves these decisions to someone else. We need all hands on deck. There is work to do. And the time to do it is now! Today! If not you, then who? The consent of the governed means something only when we the people can trust and verify the process that records our consent. We welcome you to join the ranks of the Election Integrity Network. Let’s start today! @EIwatchdogs @BasedMikeLee @seanmdav @RealAmVoice @Bannons_WarRoom @seanspicer
20
Ah Communism .....
4
8
26
588
Replying to @CynicalPublius
I am not weighing in on likelihood of electronic fraud because the data is still coming in - BUT: Your premise that it is not possible to alter electronic results across broad geographic areas is incorrect. I actually obtained the software used in real elections; it is not only possible, it is designed that way. In fact, I published a video, using the real software AND REAL DATABASES FROM REAL ELECTIONS, demonstrating that a single script can adapt to the unique candidates and measures across jurisdictions to inject predetermined allocations. The video is called Fraction Magic; there's a short and a long version; it's still online at YouTube. The specific software across jurisdictions is divided among only 3 main vendors, with two of them having about 80% of the market. Those two both got inside access to the programs because an anti-trust decision ordered them to share the underlying software and hardware.
86
1,003
54
2,447
71,684
teapawt.net/RedTeamActual/status/2… If y'all needed more evidence that Data is not the American Patriot you should be listening to, check out her latest (now do) Hot Sports Opinion on the Two Party System and how our Founding Fathers intentionally designed this country that way. On top of this clownery: teapawt.net/7HighSeas/status/21192…
No, they didn't. You CANNOT see how anyone voted on EV until 7pm on election night, which is when you actually released your "predictions" (you waited to see the EV results bat 7pm on election day and had another account release it bc we wouldn't believe you otherwise - gave you credibility) and you simply assumed the way they voted based on party registration. Not all states register by party, so your Texas "predictions" were double-fake. Assuming someone always votes for one party is insane. Pretending that independents are a myth is insane. Lying to the People is insane. You're insane. You're the fraud. To recap: you didn't predict anything, you waited to see more than half of the results and you released a fake prediction from another account for plausibility. You pussy footed around like @RealSKeshel and got it so dead wrong that now you're scrambling to reestablish yourself as an authority - but you're not. Was there fraud? Yeah, Jennica, you're looking at one in your mirror.
2
2
56
For real. Data is such a fraud.
I don’t know how she wakes up every morning and comes up with the dumbest takes. Not only is she wrong, she is also illiterate on the subject. She’s confusing how our political system evolved whith how it was designed.
1
1
46
Aubree retweeted
Replying to @DataRepublican
You didn't release your predictions until 7pm on election night. You're the fraud.
1
1
39
No, they didn't. You CANNOT see how anyone voted on EV until 7pm on election night, which is when you actually released your "predictions" (you waited to see the EV results bat 7pm on election day and had another account release it bc we wouldn't believe you otherwise - gave you credibility) and you simply assumed the way they voted based on party registration. Not all states register by party, so your Texas "predictions" were double-fake. Assuming someone always votes for one party is insane. Pretending that independents are a myth is insane. Lying to the People is insane. You're insane. You're the fraud. To recap: you didn't predict anything, you waited to see more than half of the results and you released a fake prediction from another account for plausibility. You pussy footed around like @RealSKeshel and got it so dead wrong that now you're scrambling to reestablish yourself as an authority - but you're not. Was there fraud? Yeah, Jennica, you're looking at one in your mirror.
The early voting analysis showed a 15 point shift to the blue, consistently, everywhere, when in-person voting starting. At no point did any of the early vote analysts call out fraud. They were coming up with theories for high propensities voting on Election Day, something I disagreed with strongly behind the scenes. I’m not ruling out the possibility of fraud, but the results were consistent with what early vote showed.
2
6
111
Aubree retweeted
Here’s what to request to review this election—and why: Qualified juror list: Compare with voter records to flag eligibility questions for verification. State and county voter rolls, including changes: Establish precinct registration totals and identify changes during the election. State and county turnout files: Compare both versions with ballots cast by precinct; investigate unexplained differences. Precinct results by candidate and race: Compare with turnout, especially down-ballot, to flag discrepancies. Provisional counts, envelopes and decisions: Check registration, acceptance or rejection reasons, and whether eligible votes went uncounted or ineligible ballots were accepted. Early-voting and Election Day scanner tapes: Independently total results and check against turnout, precinct results and ballot-style records. Did anyone get the wrong ballot style? Were races missing? Judges’ daily logs and ballot accounting: Reconcile voters checked in with ballots cast, used and unused each day. Chain-of-custody forms: Start with high-volume locations to verify ballot handling and transfers. Suspected voting in someone else’s name: Request mail applications, envelopes and ballot-board intake records; or in-person location, date, time, signature, provisional status and judge’s name. Match the state voter ID, not the county ID, to investigate impersonation or mistaken check-ins. Follow through: Email documented findings to elections officials, the county judge or commissioners, candidates and sitting representatives; then call. Expect redactions and potentially lengthy responses. Moving forward, my Paper Elections by Precinct report covers hand-marked/hand-counted, machine-marked/hand-counted and machine-marked/scanner-counted elections—with paper poll books, precinct reports and chain of custody providing verifiable accountability. I’m raising $10,000 for next year’s work, poll-watcher training and the guild, with $2,500 raised as of my initial post. Support the work at tbtr.us or purchase my educational materials on Substack. Or donate directly here: PayPal: @tbtx7hs Venmo: @tb-tx Cashapp: $takingbacktx Thank you, and we can fix this! 🫡🇺🇸
1
1
75
1.) Independents are not a myth. 2.) Not every state registers by party, and the fact that you'd force people to is a good reason to abolish the practice altogether. 3.) You didn't help me or anyone on the ground push our secure election measures. 4.) You need to acknowledge what is fraud and what is your own failure as a candidate or party.
Replying to @honestpollster
Independent and decline-to-state voters are largely a fabrication. You'd think a polling outfit could determine whether or not states, in reality, have 30% + registered independent voters. Most people hate the major parties, but stay in their respective camps because they want to participate in a primary. Low-to-no propensity voters are having ballots created with their voter ID numbers. It's called identity theft. You are ignoring the major vector of subversion and calling it turnout.
1
1
3
72
So JP ended his campaign with $10k and owes me $17k In Texas, you get to keep what you don't spend. Is he going to pay me?
42
Those of us who do this work have a harder time marketing ourselves successfully than those who don't do the work. If the talking heads actually used us, the actual experts, things would be different. Instead this is what we got. Thank the influencers.
1
36
Every state with a Republican legislature should immediately pass legislation to ban ballot harvesting.
526
5,895
68
39,584
257,719