V∆D‡R

I can’t stand watching people speak with absolute entitlement about situations they really know nothing about. I feel like I’ve stayed quiet long enough. The constant disrespect, the daily assumption that my silence equals to weakness, it’s become unbearable. Not just for me, but for everyone who actually believes in me and trusts me. I did not “leverage” Megaeth to mint out Netizens. It was the other way around. So if you think this, stop being delusional and so incredibly disrespectful, i've had enough. Let me be crystal clear: the team reached out to me in October and asked if I could launch something on @megaeth because they were “not satisfied with the NFT projects that were already on the chain, in terms of taste and culture”. It appeared to be very clear since the beginning how netizens could’ve been a great opportunity for the ecosystem to flourish. We were defined as the key to reach a new audience and stop stagnating. We were supposed to be the catalyst and the first brick for a new cultural development and the mint itself was meant to be an event of wider adoption. My aim was, from the start, to create a space where people could feel part of something for the first time, welcome as their unfiltered selves. Just pure art, pure culture. I believed in Mega, and I trusted their team with my work, my reputation and my efforts. But it didn’t take long for them to show their real nature. Mainnet was supposed to launch in November. I worked night and day, without breaks, to meet the deadline, only for the launch to be delayed repeatedly without proper notice (mid-November, late November, early December, and so on, until February). The constant disorganization and inconsistent communication made everything incredibly difficult. We had to coordinate an entire project under uncertainty, which even prevented us from announcing a firm mint date until the very last minute. I poured my soul into Netizens because that’s what I always do and I thought we all shared the same mission. Despite all the sugarcoated praise, they were, in reality, not ready to embrace the kind of culture they were asking for, and that we finally brought. Instead of trusting the vision, they chose mediocrity and neutrality. They let people attack me daily, calling me a scammer, undermining everything while I was doing all in my power to make the chain look good. All our efforts felt invisible. Promises were constantly made and broken. We were used for attention and clout, then quietly discarded every time any existing “community” felt threatened by something superior and actually relevant outside their small bubble. I was lied to countless times, the team was clearly not coherent or transparent with us and it started being obvious how they were just promising the same exact things to everyone else. Every time we raised real issues, we were either ignored for days or given empty reassurances that solved nothing. I had made it clear that I would rather leave than stay where I felt unwanted and unappreciated. I thought they understood. I’m no longer sure they ever did. Four days before launch, I was still questioning whether the mint should even happen, given the terrible state of the chain. When I shared my doubts with the team I was told “it’ll be fine because you’re you.” I was then called delusional for thinking netizens looked to me like the only reason for people to come to mega. Turns out the delusional ones were them. They couldn’t even sit still and let the magic happen. Couldn’t trust. Couldn’t support. And especially could not protect the few projects they themselves said deserved it, even up to today. Instead, they enabled the noise, the yes men, the total NPC behavior, all while claiming to be pro-innovation “gen-Zers”. However, It’s ironic how the same people who watched me get disrespected in silence suddenly praised me after we successfully minted out or after I worked at the EF mandate. After all these months passed, the team has gone silent, they haven’t done anything for netizens if not disappointing us. On top of all they’ve acted as if we brought nothing to the chain, turning all my work to dust. As if Netizens mint didn’t bring an insane momentum, that they were not able to make the most of. I’m exhausted from taking the blame for other people’s mistakes. Most atrocious of all, we were never even warned about Terminal shutting down, despite it directly affecting us. Terminal was always presented as our flywheel. We were told to push it hard to our community, it should’ve been our main focus for the future. Guess what? They just let us down again, empty handed. Because they lied to us, we ended up lying to our community. When we questioned about their plans after Terminal ended, they lightheartedly said, “Oh well, we don’t have any plans for NFTs!” It feels like all my efforts were wasted. I feel fooled and disrespected. They leveraged my reputation and my name for their benefit, without any regard for the consequences on me or the people who trusted me. It’s simple soulless behavior. To those who still think they can have a word on this, double check your sources. Question what you’re told. I defended myself when people painted me as the villain for simply pushing back against lies. I was told to stay quiet “to avoid conflict.” As if the internet wasn’t built on friction, on real time conversation, on calling out what’s broken. As if I could just pretend all those words didn’t break my heart. I refuse to waste any more energy trying to save people who don’t want to be saved, as much as I refuse to be disrespected further. I have more important things to do. I have to draw. And that’s irrelevant for so many people But its so relevant for me. And hopefully, I can still do something good for everyone That’s all I’ve always hoped for. You will not bring me down, ever If there’s something that will outlive this, is my art. Forever. Let it be a scar. congrats on fumbling something genuinely special. The curse is real. Have fun dealing with the consequences. @megaeth

A summary of the RAVE -95% price fluctuation from $26 to $1 over the past 24 hours. RAVE Timeline: April 18, 2026 7:26 am UTC: I posted a call to action for Binance, Bitget, & Gate to investigate RAVE market manipulation and offered a $10K bounty. 10:56 am UTC: I posted an update increasing the bounty to $25K. 11:18 am UTC: Bitget publicly acknowledged the call to action. 2:08 pm UTC: Binance publicly acknowledged the call to action. 3:06 pm UTC: RaveDAO posted claiming they have no involvement. 4:19 pm UTC: Gate publicly acknowledged the call to action. In the days leading up, on April 13 & 14, I confronted RaveDAO co-founder Yemu Xu (wildwoomoo) but have yet to receive an answer. RAVE launched in Dec 2025 on Binance Alpha with a 1B total supply. The addresses below, linked to the initial distribution, control ~95% of the RAVE supply (h/t Mlm): 0x9831156F1a6E506Fca41503590b42F07c2e80f54 0x8Ed6245C3276307E1A9D9Dc872E98A0E770070fd 0x6020656d1EF182173E45D4Fc375BDD5a48c674B0 0x2664cB80a5ee7D8EC05fe7C752dD62E078056E6d 0x2D81F8AeBf3e58A5e638006c9fd8F38C5220ecab 0x31694d761A8e851cFFbCd286aC54D01e5Ce5aFe6 0x0A1F07993a51CcEb4f52CA67765AECeADDA790d7 0xEB74Df8588cFC1C179Df4bd96C0bB8B227B9bE92 0x53d7d52301366DC14E1916b14eFeC1aDD8F3487b I found suspicious CEX activity in April 2026 tied to RaveDAO team addresses onchain, which potentially contradicts their recent statement: Bitget 0x2dc20f2180582172f5450c5d71e23fa438a7031b 0xa3a02aeb97fc1737c66f50d07d024799c137891d 0x2d95eb42525e6087e0cb7869f98da6838ed2e743 Gate 0x31711246b05d71e9eda5e38a3abb654020ee3353 Given the supply concentration, the team at minimum knows who is responsible for this price action. A simple litmus test: $6B in market cap was wiped out on just $52M of 24hr liquidations (h/t CoinGlass). That ratio points to a manipulated and unsustainable valuation. RAVE is not the only token with manipulation we have seen on major centralized exchanges. It's just the most blatant, reaching a top 15 market cap within 10 days before dropping 95% in hours. Other projects with highly questionable price action recently include: SIREN, MYX, COAI, M, PIPPIN, RIVER. Exchanges need faster intervention on manipulation. Detection at scale isn't easy, but each day of delay means retail traders absorb losses while platforms collect fees on the volume. The outcome is the same regardless of intent. While it's good the exchanges responded, I find it unlikely this activity wasn't spotted internally before I raised it publicly. I recognize how much this behavior takes from retail traders, and I plan to investigate similar movements in hopes of identifying the responsible parties. I want to reiterate that I did not take a position. If I had, I would have been liquidated myself. I also could not anticipate if or when the exchanges would comment publicly. My $25K bounty will remain active since the only DMs received were unverified claims rather than non-public information with supporting evidence as requested.