Christian conspiracies around the coming Jewish Messiah being the Antichrist is truer than they would like to admit.
I'm looking for an old 4chan greentext listing out the pros and cons of Nick Land, from what I remember:
Pros
>anti-Communist
>reinvented Calvinism
Cons
>everyone is damned to Hell
On Limited Atonement.
Christ's suffering and death would be sufficient for the whole world, but only the Elect does Christ die for (as otherwise his death would be in vain). As such, the Elect's suffering is recognized by Christ and they die with him on their cross.
Original Sin is not adequately described as the first cause behind manifest transgressions, but rather as the endlessly unjust effect of Being. We are ontologically fallen, which is what Original Sin, considered synonymous with Total Depravity, already implies.
The most esoteric and most exoteric are not only united, but nigh indistinguishable in their convergence, as revealed through the strictures of Lemurian Atlantis.
There is perhaps only one fruit who's indulgence is a sign of grace: Remembering Death (memento mori).
Anomaly Of the Elected retweeted
Even Calvin, never mind Luther, still sometimes defaults to Catholicism when in a theoretical bind. The "Universal", whether it be the literal Cosmos or Universal ideas such as "necessity" or "glory", still stifles the text like a translucent placenta.
For Catholics, the Harrowing of Hell is between Jesus' death and resurrection.
For Gnostics, the Harrowing of Hell occurs in the incarnation and passion of Jesus. Entering the Hell/World Matrix.
