Shells retweeted
I know many may not like to see me say this, but THIS IS THE BEST OUTCOME WE COULD HAVE HOPED FOR.
You'll see why soon.
Don't sit waiting for someone to do something. Get busy shining a light on the entire massive pile of steaming hot sh*t that this just was. It's GO TIME.
Fire up all your election integrity people...rebuild those groups. It's now or never.
Shells retweeted
How is this possible after this weekend?
Is fraud not the most plausible path to victory for this guy?
I mean this margin is still inconceivable to me.
Why aren’t people asking these questions about more races and districts?
Shells retweeted
Rogers got more votes this election than any Republican candidate running in Congress or even for Governorship for that matter ever did in the state’s history., including for presidential elections in much notoriously have much higher turnouts.
He also got more votes than McCain, Bush, and almost Mitt Romney for that matter.
Yet despite this, and despite the fact that a popular democratic primary candidate who lost by less than 1pt decided to endorse him and campaign with him, and despite the fact that Trump won the state in 2024, he still lost by a substantial margin rendering all his records in raw vote count meaningless.
Because somehow, in a midterm election, Abdul El-Sayed broke even more records by a substantially greater margin. Abdul El-Sayed got more votes today than any senate candidate has ever gotten for bot R or D in state history, for all election types. He got more than both Trump and Hillary in 2016. He got more than Romney and almost reached Obama 2012 numbers and he also blows out almost every Governor candidate in history (both R and D) by insane margins except for Whitmer which he was only just behind, and this is an insane terrorist supporting Muslim for a fucking midterm whose own party defected against him man.
And there are so many states where this happens. So what am I supposed to think?
Shells retweeted
Ralph Norman would have won that US Senate seat tonight, but Trump appointed Darline Graham and then endorsed her for election.
Shells retweeted
James Talarico got more 'votes' than any Democrat candidate has EVER gotten in Texas history. He got 500,000 more 'votes' than Kamala Harris got two years ago in a Presidential election year. The demographics of Texas have not changed significantly in two years.
You can talk about gas prices, or Iran, or Trump's personality until the cows come home, this still seems ... odd, to say the least.
Shells retweeted
The previous record for most Texas 'votes' for a Democrat was for Joe Biden in 2020 who got 129,000 FEWER 'votes' than Talarico has gotten so far (they're still counting) and that was the Presidential election year in which Joe Biden got 81 MILLION total 'votes.'
Shells retweeted
If Republicans had stolen the election, the Democrats would be out looting and setting fires. But since we are not violent and mentally ill, we just have to sit back and take it. I hope all those Republicans who told me to shut up about election fraud (since the fat cat low information GOP billionaires "don't want their money going to relitigate the 2020 election") have now finally woken up and understand that approach of ignoring the cheating and hoping it will just go away ain't working......
Shells retweeted
Henry McMaster, Tim Scott, William Timmons, Pamela Evette, and the rest of the South Carolina GOP establishment have some serious explaining to do.
Their political games may may have cost Republicans a Senate seat — electing a Democrat for the first time since 1998.
Shells retweeted
I live in South Carolina. We’re stuck with Annie because Trump and the establishment GOP spent a million dollars the evening before the primary election between Darline Graham and Ralph Norman with a Trump tele-rally where everyone was auto-called, and Darline blatantly lied and said Ralph was going to cut seniors' social security. It cost Ralph the election. Many seniors switched their votes because they believed it. What they did to him was dirtier than anything I've ever seen in politics.
Ralph was the only candidate who beat Annie in the polls. Yet the establishment pushed the weakest candidate and here we are.
Shells retweeted
BINGO. Breitbart warned over a year ago that Lindsey Graham was in trouble, so deeply unpopular he had only 41% approval among Republicans.
But Trump's endorsement held off any serious challengers.
Then the long criminal record of Graham's only real challenger, Mark Lynch, devastatingly dribbled out during the primary, giving Lindsey the win, but still with Graham only winning 56% percent of the vote. Again, Lindsey's opponent was a guy with a serious criminal record that included drunk driving, hit and run and drug trafficking, and Lindsey only won 56% of the vote.
If you are going to try for a dynasty, the original holder of the Senate seat must be over whelmingly popular. Like 70+% favorability.
Trump and the GOP leadership in South Carolina jamming another Graham down our throats to hold on to their machine was a devastating error. The polls of the last year and a half would have shown that, had anyone at the White House read them.
And don't blame Ralph Norman. Darline Graham lost by 92,000 votes. There were only 4,894 write ins.
Ralph Norman would have won this seat. Even Russell Fry, who Trump originally pledged to endorse, then suddenly (bizarrely) dropped for Darline, would have won this Senate seat.
All the signs were there if anyone had paid attention to South Carolina voters. Pam Evette's political career (she ran for governor) quickly imploded earlier this year in the GOP primary over a nepotism scandal DESPITE TRUMP'S ENDORSEMENT OF EVETTE. (She was SC Gov. Henry McMaster's heir apparent, but lost after it was learned she planned to run with McMaster's son, who had no political experience, as her running mate, setting up a dynasty.)
Trying to ram a second dynasty down South Carolinians throats was madness by Team Trump at that point.
Shells retweeted
Also for the record,
I do owe @AnnieAndrewsMD a tank of gas.
Shells retweeted
ALERT: An alert poll worker in Michigan has detected a Wi-Fi signal prior to closure of the polls that appears to be connected to a foreign Wi-Fi device inside a tabulator.
Only way to know for sure is to conduct a Physical Configuration Audit and a review of event logs for all tabulators in use to support our elections.
NOTE: There are no EAC certified tabulator configurations in use in Michigan which include internal modems (i.e. hidden within chassis and typically installed on motherboard).
Why is this concerning?
Remote access to tabulators opens the door to following election fraud mechanisms as a minimum:
1) Advanced intel on election results prior to closure of polls enabling fraudsters to "order" ballots to fill in vote deficits against projections
2) Direct manipulation of vote tallies
3) Direct manipulation of ballot images
Plus, it violates the chain of custody for election results.
@RealLindellTV @realMikeLindell @EmeraldRobinson
Shells retweeted
Here you go - thank the lord people are now savvy to the cheat. What is going on?
ALERT: An alert poll worker in Michigan has detected a Wi-Fi signal prior to closure of the polls that appears to be connected to a foreign Wi-Fi device inside a tabulator.
Only way to know for sure is to conduct a Physical Configuration Audit and a review of event logs for all tabulators in use to support our elections.
NOTE: There are no EAC certified tabulator configurations in use in Michigan which include internal modems (i.e. hidden within chassis and typically installed on motherboard).
Why is this concerning?
Remote access to tabulators opens the door to following election fraud mechanisms as a minimum:
1) Advanced intel on election results prior to closure of polls enabling fraudsters to "order" ballots to fill in vote deficits against projections
2) Direct manipulation of vote tallies
3) Direct manipulation of ballot images
Plus, it violates the chain of custody for election results.
@RealLindellTV @realMikeLindell @EmeraldRobinson
Shells retweeted
Now just prove it. But ! once you do prove it, good luck getting someone , anyone arrested. Heck good luck getting Arrested for anything. You’ve Got a better shot at winning the lottery.
I’m thinking, if voting actually mattered , they probably would have never let us vote.
😂
Seems about right.
