Trabajo remoto | B2B SaaS Ps: tengo un canal en Insta para trabajos remotos - únete: https://xitter.cf/t.co/v4j46rd4RQ
Joined September 2009
- Tweets112K
- Following970
- Followers20.1K
- Likes139K
Aidnes retweeted
Si tu teoría necesita ignorar el colapso de un país y la migración de 7 millones de personas para mantenerse en pie, no tienes una "teoría":
Solo Tienes un mojón en vez de un cerebro en la cabeza.
Aidnes retweeted
No podemos opinar de la política Latinoamérica, pero eso sí, cuando el chavismo financio a toda la izquierda latina con el dinero de los venezolanos, allí si que les encantaba y te hablaban bien de Venezuela y la revolución bolivariana jajaja
A mi me lo dijeron cuando tenia ventipico y no creía, me parecía absurdo...
Pero si amigos, en estos años ya muchas cosas son simplemente opcionales.
¿Calarse necedades de otro? No, directo se mandan a freir monos.
Aidnes retweeted
Ya @LuisCarlos lo ha explicado: aunque el techo de una de queso no es tan alto como el de una gran empanada de cazón o carne, esta crea un piso de calidad.
Si la de queso no está buena, ni siquiera deberías probar las demás. Si está mala, queso representa el mal o amenaza menor.
Este es uno de esos momentos "AJÁ" que solo entiendes luego de experimentar la fatíga de IA.
A super interesting new study from Harvard Business Review.
A 8-month field study at a US tech company with about 200 employees found that AI use did not shrink work, it intensified it, and made employees busier.
Task expansion happened because AI filled in gaps in knowledge, so people started doing work that used to belong to other roles or would have been outsourced or deferred.
That shift created extra coordination and review work for specialists, including fixing AI-assisted drafts and coaching colleagues whose work was only partly correct or complete.
Boundaries blurred because starting became as easy as writing a prompt, so work slipped into lunch, meetings, and the minutes right before stepping away.
Multitasking rose because people ran multiple AI threads at once and kept checking outputs, which increased attention switching and mental load.
Over time, this faster rhythm raised expectations for speed through what became visible and normal, even without explicit pressure from managers.
"Nuestra AI ha estado alucinando analíticas por 3 meses"
He visto gente usando la IA sin ningín tipo de supervisión real y este es el tipo de cosas que pasan. Se tomaron decisiones de negocios basadas en datos FALSOS...
En esas estamos.
This is not going to be used mainly for Dogs, in case that's not quite clear.
Ring paid somewhere between $8 and $10 million for a 30-second Super Bowl spot to tell 120 million viewers that their cameras now scan neighborhoods using AI.
The math is wild. Ring has roughly 20 million devices in American homes. Search Party is enabled by default. The opt-out rate on default settings in consumer tech is historically around 5%. So approximately 19 million cameras are now running AI pattern matching on anything that moves past your front door. Today the target is dogs. The same infrastructure already handles “Familiar Faces,” which builds biometric profiles of every person your camera sees, whether they know about it or not.
Ring settled with the FTC for $5.8 million after employees had unrestricted access to customers’ bedroom and bathroom footage for years. They’re now partnered with Flock Safety, which routes footage to local law enforcement. ICE has accessed Flock data through local police departments acting as intermediaries. Senator Markey’s investigation found Ring’s privacy protections only apply to device owners. If you’re a neighbor, a delivery driver, a passerby, you have no rights and no recourse.
This tells you everything about Amazon’s actual product. The customer paid for the camera. The customer pays the electricity. The customer pays the $3.99/month subscription. And Amazon gets a surveillance grid that would cost tens of billions to build from scratch, with an AI layer activated by default, and a law enforcement pipeline already connected.
They wrapped all of that in a lost puppy commercial because that’s the only version of this story anyone would willingly opt into.
Aidnes retweeted
This is being read as a philosophical farewell. It’s a resignation letter from the head of Anthropic’s Safeguards Research Team, and the most important sentence is buried in paragraph three.
“I’ve repeatedly seen how hard it is to truly let our values govern our actions. I’ve seen this within myself, within the organization, where we constantly face pressures to set aside what matters most.”
That’s the person responsible for keeping Claude safe telling you the pressures to ship are winning.
Mrinank Sharma built the Constitutional Classifiers system, developed defenses against AI-assisted bioterrorism, and authored one of the first AI safety cases ever written. Two years of work at the exact intersection of “make the model safe” and “ship the model fast.” And he just walked away.
Now zoom out. Dylan Scandinaro, another Anthropic AI safety researcher, left last week to become OpenAI’s Head of Preparedness. Harsh Mehta and Behnam Neyshabur, both senior technical staff, also departed in the past two weeks. Four notable exits in a single month from the company that sells itself as the responsible AI lab.
Meanwhile, Anthropic is in talks to raise at a $350B valuation and just launched Opus 4.6 last Thursday. The commercial engine is accelerating. The safety talent is dispersing.
This is the core tension of every AI company right now: the people building the guardrails and the people building the revenue targets occupy the same org chart, but they optimize for different variables. When the pressure to scale wins enough internal battles, the safety people don’t fight forever. They leave and write beautifully worded letters about integrity.
Sharma’s next move tells you everything. He’s pursuing a poetry degree. When your head of safeguards research decides the most authentic use of his time is writing poems instead of writing safety cases, that’s a signal about what he believes the safety cases were actually accomplishing.
Aidnes retweeted
Talking about voice acting and not mentioning Kenjiro Tsuda would be a sin, the way he voiced Nanami and took his charisma to next level..
Also below is Nanami's final scene that he voiced, didn't add the exact scene as we all know how it went 😭
Aidnes retweeted
His father did not wrestle crocodiles, wrangle cobras, and box kangaroos for you to call Robert Irwin some random white boy.
look at this random white boy who doesnt know a lick of spanish living his best life to bad bunny with no problem. let's learn something from this!
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This “random white boy” is Robert Irwin, a world renowned conservationist, & son of the Crocodile Hunter Steve Irwin.
google.com/search?q=rober…
