Guidelines of engagement shall be

Same thing🤷🏽‍♂️

Language cannot capture objective or ultimate truth. No one source contains every truth or piece of wisdom. Smash your own pot to transcend it🙏🏾

Given his own home made God, JURS position here is often odd to me. His whole philosophy acknowledges that words dont actually describe the thing, they only communicate ideas about the thing, but also shape how we view the thing. But he cant grasp why we still use those words🤷🏽‍♂️

Due to shadow ban I cant reply in thread. But seeing this. It's worth noting youve read project Azathoth so know JUR himself flirts with the same use of language that mystics do whilst calling them honest lies. He has a home made God he believes is real. Hes not different to Xho

Cases of Cannibalism famously attributed to Werewolves include... Pierre Burgot & Michel Verdun 1521 Gilles Garnier 1573 Peter Stump 1589 The Gandillon Family 1598 Jean Grenier 1603 Thiess of Kaltenbrun 1692 Even the Beast of Gevaudan 1764-1767

Am I saying cannibalism is exclusive to Europeans? no. But theyre historically ritualistic... Rather than an industrialised effort of digging up the corpses of the invaded to consume them. Secular Europeans called it the crime of Lycanthropy rather than cannibalism(if European)

In 1098ce Christians devoured the flesh of local Muslims in Ma'arra. Cannibalism was commercialised in Christian Europe between the 12th century & lingering into the 20th century. More human flesh was consumed in Europe than in the colonised lands, where Europeans also ate people

It becomes increasingly interesting how many people believe that humans evolved as paranoid victims of their environment, because of a natural drive to detect agency... that isnt even exclusive to our species.

you know this concept is kind of unique to Christianity right? the idea of the OG sin staining humans doesnt exist in the other Abrahamic faiths. Doesn't really exist outside of them either.

If Consciousness is "mutual awareness" & internal knowledge. Then is it not... Awareness of visual forms. Of sounds. Of smells. Of tastes. Of physical sensations(touch, temperature). And of mental objects(thoughts, memories, ideas)? Then the collective unconscious & conscious?

The definitions I shall by using for the forseeable. As well as my own spin on the science of Purpose. In which teleology is Perceptual Teleonomy... And Teleonomy is the Principal of Least Action + Hysteresis within a biological framework.

The fundamental constituents of reality are "conscious agents". Not Human minds, but minimal units of experience & decision that interact, form networks & generate the structures we percieve as physical reality. We're localised perspectives in an interacting field of awareness.

Consciousness MIGHT arise from coherent process that bind the brain into a single quantum system rather than isolated comptations from within the skull according to "tentative" experimental "hints". I.e The "Binding Problem" & Quantum Entanglement, Effects in Microtubules, etc

The particle or electron that can be measured is not the particle or electron as it truly exists. The name that can be named is a low bandwidth language buffer for transmitting thought. Nameless is the beginning of spacetime. The named birth 10k things.

tsk... should have brought this up the other day when "@HarveyWall15 was still kicking off about weak atheism. ah well. cest la vie.