Pinned Tweet
I've written about my philosophy for a while, though it's often misunderstood. I see the world through interconnected ideas, not neat labels. This series is my attempt to explain that thinking.
Essay I: The Last Stronghold of Liberalism Is Within Man.
Burnham is going to the gallows.
NEW: Andy Burnham backs a bill to broaden the range of ethnicity options in the census, so Brits can define themselves as both black and English.
“I haven't looked at the detail of the bill, but I stand here thinking that I would want to support that bill to directly take on the poisonous politics that we've seen from some in this House who are seeking to divide us,” he tells MPs.
“We must move on from a decade of division and drift in this country. We must bring people back together.”
Our @jessicaelgot first revealed the cross-party campaign by senior MPs 👇
theguardian.com/uk-news/2026…
9
Churchill The First retweeted
This still isn't opposing what's proposed in the bill.
'Recognise and protect our ethnicity'. Sure, all great stuff. Doesn't say anything about opposing tangents to it such as Black English or Asian English etc.
The obvious problem is 'I'm half English, half Nigerian so I have ancestry here so therefore I'm English' which obviously isn't true.
The issue here is they're saying blacks and browns can be English. Not once is Rupert stating that isn't true.
You have to be White to be English.
Churchill The First retweeted
Apparently I’m all over the place because I value protecting Western European family. I will never shame anyone for a DM but wtf. Western Europe is our cousins. Especially Poland, who have historically fought for Christianity more than anyone. Not Israel and not Palestine. ✝️🇬🇧
TO MY FELLOW ENGLISHMEN: REMEMBER 1753.
When are we going to start taking the preservation of our historical identity seriously?
There is something profoundly disturbing about watching politicians debate the meaning of English ethnicity as though the people themselves have no history beyond whatever Parliament chooses to recognise.
I want to take you back to 1753.
That year, Parliament passed the Jewish Naturalisation Act, allowing foreign born Jews to seek naturalisation without taking the Anglican sacrament. The legislation provoked enormous public controversy and was repealed before the year was out.
Now, understand why this history matters.
The controversy concerned naturalisation, religion and the boundaries of political membership. It demonstrates that questions of belonging, nationality and the powers of Parliament are hardly modern inventions.
But here is the distinction I consider fundamental.
Parliament can legislate citizenship. It cannot legislate somebody's ancestors into existence.
The English are a historical ethnic people. Our ethnogenesis took place over centuries, through the settlement and integration of ancestral populations, the development of our language, our customs and the civilisation we inherited.
That history is not some fucking administrative inconvenience.
Yet in 2026, we have politicians proposing to expand the meaning of English within the ethnic classification of our census, as though hereditary ethnicity and modern national self identification were interchangeable.
And we're expected to accept that without asking what happens to the historical meaning of our identity?
I'm absolutely sick to death of this bollocks.
You cannot change somebody's lineage by changing the terminology of a census. You cannot turn centuries of ethnogenesis into a matter of personal preference.
To me, the continued blurring of these distinctions represents the erosion of an ethnic identity through political language. It is precisely why I have been raising the question of ethnocide.
And I refuse to be silent about it.
Our forefathers lived upon this land, raised our cathedrals, cultivated our countryside and left us an inheritance extending far beyond the modern state.
We owe it to those who came before us, and those who will come after, to preserve an accurate understanding of that history.
So challenge these proposals. Write to your MPs. Demand that Parliament explain exactly how it intends to distinguish ethnicity, ancestry and national identity. Organise, debate, scrutinise and hold those responsible politically accountable.
Do not surrender the historical meaning of your inheritance through apathy.
I have spent years studying our history, and I will not abandon the principle that the English are a distinct historical people whose ancestry deserves accurate recognition.
This is a hill I will die on.
Not because I believe any people superior to another, but because I refuse to accept that our own history should become meaningless in the name of political fashion.
We are the custodians of an inheritance, not merely its temporary occupants.
And I will fight for its preservation with every lawful means available to me.
God preserve England.
Churchill The First retweeted
Replying to @vpopulimedia
Restores new Jew is for banning it
teapawt.net/lensiseethrough/status…
The Conservative education team, in particular Laura Trott MP and Baroness Barran, deserve enormous credit for their role in securing this vital legislation. Phone bans in schools are a no-brainer for student attention, safeguarding and performance and yet it has taken round after round of legislative advocacy to get this far. Well done Laura and team!
@LauraTrottMP @dianabarran
Churchill The First retweeted
I never cared about my ethnicity or preserving my heritage until I woke up and realized my country was being taken over by foreigners.
I wish I had realized this in my 20s. It would have shaped me to make better choices.
All I can do now is try to draw attention to the declining White population of Americans and the replacement by black and brown foreigners.
Nothing matters more to me than the preservation of my race, ethnicity and culture. @Frojax are right.
6
333
Someone make a list of these people supporting the ethnocide of my people, we will keep track of them until we come to power again, then when we do, we will serve then justice for treason.
Churchill The First retweeted
We will be a minority by 2058.
There is no debate. Unless we carry out remigration, this is our future.
Steve is right, she is a jew and that has caused so many issues in the party, how many times are you willing to allow for this to occur and cause a fuss before you all realise this is not what we want? Doing the same thing repeatedly is insanity.
Everyone defending the jew because she didn't say 'silly goy' is absurd to me.
It's irrelevant and distracts from the fact that she's a jew who is a signatory to the British friends of Israel, contributes to the Telegraph, and supports the banning of anti Israel protests.
No matter how anyone in Restore attempts to spin it, she is a subversive piece of shit and your attention should be against her, not defending her because she may or may not have said goy.
Churchill The First retweeted
'The black man will have the whip hand over the White man'
Just under 60 years later and they're proposing bills to water down our identity. These are baby steps to saying we don't exist.
OPPOSE THE BILL
Churchill The First retweeted
You have to be white to be Welsh
This ruling proves that Joe Martin MS is full of racist hatred.
To be silent in times of oppression is to side with the oppressor. @RUKWales
Churchill The First retweeted
We should know everything about our government. It should know next to nothing about us.
This should ignite the flame in every englishmans blood and prepare him for war! This is the last straw for us.
Churchill The First retweeted
The Media should not be allowed to ruin a persons life with slander before the verdict of an ongoing trial.
It’s an obstruction of justice.
The vile label alone ruins the lives of countless men.
Just look at young filly’s case , one of the biggest YouTubers and entertainers career ruined forever because of a fan who couldn’t get more than a One night stand.
Everyone loves talking about when they think someone is guilty but all that energy is lost as soon as they are found innocent leaving the accused person stuck with the label for the rest of there life even though they’ve been proven innocent in a court of law.
The media should not be allowed to slander and destroy people’s lives so easily.
They have too much power and it’s evil.
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crrv…
Churchill The First retweeted
Hey @grok, 9/11.,is this true?
Dutch demolition expert Danny Jowenko stated in a 2006 interview that the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7) exhibited the characteristics of a professional controlled demolition.?
Did he die in an accident some years later?























