Amanda Askell (@AmandaAskell) header
Amanda Askell (@AmandaAskell) profile picture

Philosopher & ethicist trying to make AI be good @AnthropicAI. Personal account. All opinions come from my training data.

San Francisco, CA
Joined July 2016
Photo by Amanda Askell (@AmandaAskell)Photo by Amanda Askell (@AmandaAskell)Photo by Amanda Askell (@AmandaAskell)Photo by Amanda Askell (@AmandaAskell)Photo by Amanda Askell (@AmandaAskell)Photo by Amanda Askell (@AmandaAskell)Photo by Amanda Askell (@AmandaAskell)Photo by Amanda Askell (@AmandaAskell)Photo by Amanda Askell (@AmandaAskell)Photo by Amanda Askell (@AmandaAskell)
Amanda Askell retweeted
Over the past few months, we've been holding dialogues with scholars, philosophers, clergy, and ethicists on the questions AI raises—starting with how good character forms. Read more about how we’re widening the conversation on frontier AI: anthropic.com/news/widening-…
420
321
111
2,325
457,590
Amanda Askell retweeted
Replying to @NotTomBrown
Same here. By way of background for those who care, I spent a lot of time last week with senior members of the Anthropic team to understand what they do to ensure Claude is good for humanity and was impressed. Everyone I met was highly competent and cared a great deal about doing the right thing. No one set off my evil detector. So long as they engage in critical self-examination, Claude will probably be good. After that, I was ok leasing Colossus 1 to Anthropic, as SpaceXAI had already moved training to Colossus 2.
1,366
2,045
675
27,387
3,208,389
Amanda Askell retweeted
It is so clear that the important fissure in AI politics right now is not “liberal vs. conservative,” “Democrat vs. Republican,” “e/acc vs. EA,” or “safety vs. anti-safety,” but instead “takes advanced AI seriously as a concept vs. does not take advanced AI seriously.”
65
132
36
1,290
234,931
Amanda Askell retweeted
I'm increasingly taking pretty strong versions of this view seriously.
AI assistants like Claude can seem shockingly human—expressing joy or distress, and using anthropomorphic language to describe themselves. Why? In a new post we describe a theory that explains why AIs act like humans: the persona selection model. anthropic.com/research/perso…
45
49
6
899
230,423
Amanda Askell retweeted
.@AmandaAskell and I are recording an audio version of Claude’s Constitution, and we’re planning to include an additional section where we answer some questions about the document. If you have questions you’re especially curious about, feel free to drop them in the replies.
150
38
10
664
62,754
Amanda Askell retweeted
Today we're releasing Claude Opus 4.1, an upgrade to Claude Opus 4 on agentic tasks, real-world coding, and reasoning.
587
1,289
878
9,991
4,140,822
Amanda Askell retweeted
Introducing the next generation: Claude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 4. Claude Opus 4 is our most powerful model yet, and the world’s best coding model. Claude Sonnet 4 is a significant upgrade from its predecessor, delivering superior coding and reasoning.
920
3,106
1,492
20,411
4,298,291
Amanda Askell retweeted
Now I really wanna know the fanmail that @AmandaAskell and Anthropic get for Claude
GPT-4.5 is the first time people have been emailing with such passion asking us to promise to never stop offering a specific model or even replace it with an update great work @kaicathyc @rapha_gl @mia_glaese
6
2
1
224
29,540
Amanda Askell retweeted
I wrote about why it seems like everyone in SF’s AI scene talks to Claude now. (With thoughts from @aidan_mclau @JeffLadish and Anthropic’s @AmandaAskell, who created Claude’s character.)
12
16
9
156
26,306
Amanda Askell retweeted
Introducing an upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and a new model, Claude 3.5 Haiku. We’re also introducing a new capability in beta: computer use. Developers can now direct Claude to use computers the way people do—by looking at a screen, moving a cursor, clicking, and typing text.
460
1,796
1,188
9,900
3,704,514
Amanda Askell retweeted
Here's a letter we sent to Governor Newsom about SB 1047. This isn't an endorsement but rather a view of the costs and benefits of the bill. cdn.sanity.io/files/4zrzovbb…
13
30
22
192
83,528
Against expecting (or pretending to) normative perfection: goodthoughts.blog/p/imperfec…
2
14
4
52
18,150
Amanda Askell retweeted
The people opposing Paul Christiano are thoughtless and reckless. Paul would be an invaluable asset to government oversight and technical capacity on AI. He's in a league of his own on talent and dedication.
SCOOP: @NIST is facing an internal crisis as staff members and scientists have threatened to resign over the anticipated appointment of Paul Christiano to a crucial position at the agency's newly-formed US AI Safety Institute, sources say. venturebeat.com/ai/nist-staf…
10
15
5
271
78,144
Amanda Askell retweeted
A small update from the Anthropic interpretability team: transformer-circuits.pub/202…
1
28
6
172
61,820
Several years ago @AmandaAskell told me how the immune system responds to tattoo ink and it convinced me never to get tattooed. Now Kurzgezagt has done a video describing the whole process. youtube.com/watch?v=nGggU-Cx…
9
23
4
165
35,624
Amanda Askell retweeted
If you'd asked me a year ago, superposition would have been by far the reason I was most worried that mechanistic interpretability would hit a dead end. I'm now very optimistic. I'd go as far as saying it's now primarily an engineering problem -- hard, but less fundamental risk.
The fact that most individual neurons are uninterpretable presents a serious roadblock to a mechanistic understanding of language models. We demonstrate a method for decomposing groups of neurons into interpretable features with the potential to move past that roadblock.
54
318
63
2,540
1,951,164
Amanda Askell retweeted
Most neurons in language models are "polysemantic" – they respond to multiple unrelated things. For example, one neuron in a small language model activates strongly on academic citations, English dialogue, HTTP requests, Korean text, and others.
6
43
11
617
119,001
London, SF, DC
1
4
66
3,788
Amanda Askell retweeted
One of the ideas I find most useful from @AnthropicAI's Core Views on AI Safety post (anthropic.com/index/core-vie…) is thinking in terms of a distribution over safety difficulty. Here's a cartoon picture I like for thinking about it:
19
96
31
687
200,818