
Philosopher & ethicist trying to make AI be good @AnthropicAI. Personal account. All opinions come from my training data.
San Francisco, CA
Joined July 2016
- Tweets5.3K
- Following663
- Followers115K
- Likes9.6K
Amanda Askell retweeted
Over the past few months, we've been holding dialogues with scholars, philosophers, clergy, and ethicists on the questions AI raises—starting with how good character forms.
Read more about how we’re widening the conversation on frontier AI: anthropic.com/news/widening-…
Replying to @NotTomBrown
Same here.
By way of background for those who care, I spent a lot of time last week with senior members of the Anthropic team to understand what they do to ensure Claude is good for humanity and was impressed.
Everyone I met was highly competent and cared a great deal about doing the right thing. No one set off my evil detector. So long as they engage in critical self-examination, Claude will probably be good.
After that, I was ok leasing Colossus 1 to Anthropic, as SpaceXAI had already moved training to Colossus 2.
Amanda Askell retweeted
It is so clear that the important fissure in AI politics right now is not “liberal vs. conservative,” “Democrat vs. Republican,” “e/acc vs. EA,” or “safety vs. anti-safety,” but instead “takes advanced AI seriously as a concept vs. does not take advanced AI seriously.”
Amanda Askell retweeted
I'm increasingly taking pretty strong versions of this view seriously.
AI assistants like Claude can seem shockingly human—expressing joy or distress, and using anthropomorphic language to describe themselves. Why?
In a new post we describe a theory that explains why AIs act like humans: the persona selection model.
anthropic.com/research/perso…
Amanda Askell retweeted
.@AmandaAskell and I are recording an audio version of Claude’s Constitution, and we’re planning to include an additional section where we answer some questions about the document. If you have questions you’re especially curious about, feel free to drop them in the replies.
Amanda Askell retweeted
Today we're releasing Claude Opus 4.1, an upgrade to Claude Opus 4 on agentic tasks, real-world coding, and reasoning.
Amanda Askell retweeted
Introducing the next generation: Claude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 4.
Claude Opus 4 is our most powerful model yet, and the world’s best coding model.
Claude Sonnet 4 is a significant upgrade from its predecessor, delivering superior coding and reasoning.
Amanda Askell retweeted
Now I really wanna know the fanmail that @AmandaAskell and Anthropic get for Claude
GPT-4.5 is the first time people have been emailing with such passion asking us to promise to never stop offering a specific model or even replace it with an update
great work @kaicathyc @rapha_gl @mia_glaese
Amanda Askell retweeted
I wrote about why it seems like everyone in SF’s AI scene talks to Claude now.
(With thoughts from @aidan_mclau @JeffLadish and Anthropic’s @AmandaAskell, who created Claude’s character.)
Amanda Askell retweeted
Introducing an upgraded Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and a new model, Claude 3.5 Haiku. We’re also introducing a new capability in beta: computer use.
Developers can now direct Claude to use computers the way people do—by looking at a screen, moving a cursor, clicking, and typing text.
Amanda Askell retweeted
Here's a letter we sent to Governor Newsom about SB 1047. This isn't an endorsement but rather a view of the costs and benefits of the bill. cdn.sanity.io/files/4zrzovbb…
Amanda Askell retweeted
Against expecting (or pretending to) normative perfection: goodthoughts.blog/p/imperfec…
Amanda Askell retweeted
The people opposing Paul Christiano are thoughtless and reckless. Paul would be an invaluable asset to government oversight and technical capacity on AI. He's in a league of his own on talent and dedication.
SCOOP: @NIST is facing an internal crisis as staff members and scientists have threatened to resign over the anticipated appointment of Paul Christiano to a crucial position at the agency's newly-formed US AI Safety Institute, sources say.
venturebeat.com/ai/nist-staf…
Amanda Askell retweeted
A small update from the Anthropic interpretability team:
transformer-circuits.pub/202…
Amanda Askell retweeted
Several years ago @AmandaAskell told me how the immune system responds to tattoo ink and it convinced me never to get tattooed. Now Kurzgezagt has done a video describing the whole process.
youtube.com/watch?v=nGggU-Cx…
Amanda Askell retweeted
I wrote up some thoughts on AI pause advocacy. If you consider yourself an AI pause advocate, I think this will be a useful read! alignmentforum.org/posts/mcn…
Amanda Askell retweeted
If you'd asked me a year ago, superposition would have been by far the reason I was most worried that mechanistic interpretability would hit a dead end.
I'm now very optimistic. I'd go as far as saying it's now primarily an engineering problem -- hard, but less fundamental risk.
Amanda Askell retweeted
Most neurons in language models are "polysemantic" – they respond to multiple unrelated things. For example, one neuron in a small language model activates strongly on academic citations, English dialogue, HTTP requests, Korean text, and others.

ALT Shows twenty short example texts on which Neuron #83 fires. Each text is split into tokens, which are colored a shade of orange corresponding to how active the neuron is. Each text is labeled on the right with the type of text it is. The first four and last examples are labeled "Korean". One is labeled "Japanese". The example " Mouftah. Characterization of inter" is labeled "Citations". The example "dad…' he snarled. 'Even though you" is labeled "Dialogue". The example "string) (*http.Request, error)" is labeled "HTTP Request."
Amanda Askell retweeted
One of the ideas I find most useful from @AnthropicAI's Core Views on AI Safety post (anthropic.com/index/core-vie…) is thinking in terms of a distribution over safety difficulty.
Here's a cartoon picture I like for thinking about it:























