
Curated content for systems leaders. Principal + CEO https://teapawt.net/t.co/Lzjf7UjbcM + Founder #termexecutive. Growing resilient nonprofits.
Washington, DC
Joined May 2012
- Tweets6.9K
- Following3.8K
- Followers1.7K
- Likes13K
“The boundaries of our professions (are) narrower than the consequences of our work.” HT/Via @sineadbovell
I’ll say it again and again, we are entering an era that will reward systems thinkers.
Systems thinking is the ability to understand how the parts of a broader system connect and influence one another over time. It means recognizing feedback loops, anticipating consequences, and understanding how a decision in one area can create trade-offs in another.
The boundaries of our professions have always been narrower than the consequences of our work. As AI begins to blur these boundaries, and as our world becomes increasingly interconnected in non-linear ways, systems thinking will become essential.
I don’t think this signals the end of expertise, as some people proclaim. But the ability to zoom out and make connections across a broader system will be crucial.
Read my latest Substack on systems thinking (link in comments)
Anna Prow retweeted
The 8 Laws of Learning, according to legendary coach John Wooden:
1. Explanation
2. Demonstration
3. Imitation
4. Repetition
5. Repetition
6. Repetition
7. Repetition
8. Repetition
Anna Prow retweeted
All employees come in 5 levels, choose wisely:
Level 1 - tells you there's a problem
Level 2 - tells you there's a problem and what caused it
Level 3 - tells you there's a problem, what caused it, and options to fix it
Level 4 - tells you there's a problem, what caused it, options to fix it, and which one they'd pick
Level 5 - tells you there was a problem, what caused it, how they fixed it, and future proof’d it
Anna Prow retweeted
A peak productivity advice from James Clear:
“You are not your grand plans. You are your daily patterns.”
“We are biologically wired to confuse confidence with competence.” HT/Via @thesupermannx
This paper answers why confident idiots run the world.
Cornell University published a psychological paper that explains every terrible boss, every loud influencer, and every broken corporate hierarchy.
It’s called “Unskilled and Unaware of It.”
they tested participants across logic, grammar, and humor to measure the gap between actual performance and self-perception.
And the results are wild.
participants scoring in the bottom 12th percentile consistently believed they were operating in the 62nd percentile.
they were not lying. they were literally incapable of recognizing their own incompetence.
the paper revealed a brutal paradox:
the exact skills required to master a domain are the exact same skills required to accurately evaluate your own competence in that domain.
if you lack the skill, you inherently lack the cognitive capacity to realize you are failing.
this creates a dangerous systemic loop.
the incompetent are blessed with absolute, blinding certainty. their brain protects them from their own ignorance, allowing them to speak first, demand authority, and never second-guess their decisions.
meanwhile, the actual experts suffer the exact inverse.
top performers in the study consistently underestimated their rank. because a task was easy for them, they falsely assumed it was easy for everyone else.
they hesitate. they obsess over nuance. they assume they have nothing unique to add.
we are biologically wired to confuse confidence with competence.
the loudest person in the room gets promoted, gets funded, and gets the microphone, not because they know what they are doing, but because they are physically incapable of seeing what they don't.
the only defense mechanism is building systems that stop rewarding absolute certainty and start demanding proof of work.
"(S)tructure is not the opposite of freedom. It’s the thing that keeps freedom from turning into aimlessness." HT/VIA @justinskycak
"Every system decays" unless maintained with intention. HT @justinskycak
There are a couple of universal patterns that show up across fields that you should apply to pretty much anything:
- Use a written process because memory isn't reliable (see aviation checklists, surgery, mise en place, SOPs...)
- Stop early when something is wrong (Andon cord, feature flags, turnaround time, error budgets...)
- Leave a buffer (Margin of safety, safety stock, taper, defense in depth...)
- Fix the system rather than blame people (Blameless post-mortems, poka-yoke, Swiss cheese model...)
- Get feedback fast (OODA, kaizen, canary releases, after-action reviews...)
- Hand over with a fixed format (SBAR, BLUF, commander's intent...)
- Ramp up gradually (10% rule, canary releases, position sizing....)
“Become difficult to rush.” HT/Via @SahilBloom
Anna Prow retweeted
How many leaders would you guess actually create #PsychologicalSafety for their teams?
After a decade of books, articles & podcasts on the subject, you'd guess most of us have this figured out by now.
McKinsey puts the real number at about 1 in 4.
We're not nearly as good at this as we think we are.
#Leadership #LeadFromTheHeart #HR #SHRM #WellBeing
Anna Prow retweeted
The loser has more in common with the winner than with the person sitting on the sidelines.
The winner and the loser each had the courage to try. Both risked embarrassment. Both were willing to face uncertainty. Both were stubborn enough to continue.
Success is endurance in disguise. It belongs to the person who can absorb the losses without absorbing the identity of "loser." It's the courage to start — and to stick with it — that is the real separator. Results tend to find the person who stays in the game.
The sidelines are safe, but sterile. Nothing grows there.
Anna Prow retweeted
Something I noticed about resilient people: They don't have fewer problems. They have faster reset times. Bad news hits at 9am. By 10am, they're back to their priorities. They feel it, process it, and move. The speed of the reset matters more than the size of the setback. – at Winthrop, MA
Anna Prow retweeted
The nervous system learns what you repeatedly survive. If you endure rejection without collapsing, boredom without escaping, and stress without reaching for the old relief mechanism, those states gradually lose authority. Resilience is built by giving your brain repeated proof that discomfort is survivable without self-destruction.
“(W)atch for people who push urgency without giving you time to think. (B)uild a rule where you never agree to important decisions in the same moment they are presented, because time pressure is often used to bypass your judgment.” HT/Via @UnmodernmanBot
Anna Prow retweeted
The fastest way to detect manipulation is to watch for people who push urgency without giving you time to think, so build a rule where you never agree to important decisions in the same moment they are presented, because time pressure is often used to bypass your judgment.
“A meaningful part of success comes from what you do for other people.” HT/Via @MarkCCrowley
Well aligned to what Adam Grant discovered a decade+ ago, @AngelaDuckworth's new book argues that successful people aren't simply more talented, smarter, or more driven than everyone else. A meaningful part of success comes from what you do for other people (Give!)— and from developing the character traits that make you useful to them.
Applied to #leadership, caring leaders are naturally more successful.
#LeadFromTheHeart #HR #SHRM #Management #FutureOfWork




















