Just in case it’s difficult for you to comprehend:
“I made a choice” > We support you
“I don’t believe women should have a choice” > Fuck you
Nutella retweeted
I am pro-life from conception to natural death. That's why I support Medicare for All, universal childcare, housing, and free education.
If you call women whores & oppose the very policies that help families thrive, you're not pro-life. You're pro-forced birth
Nutella retweeted
If there was a 1% chance that 9 month after having sex your penis could explode and kill you, and your doctor could stop it, but the government says no, you really wanna roll the dice on those odds?
Nutella retweeted
Replying to @LiveAction
So what you're saying is it's better to incur thousands of dollars in medical debt, painfully carry a fetus to term that you know will not survive, and then give birth so it can suffer an agonizing 2 hours before finally dying?
Is that pro-life? Or pro-needless suffering?
“Even though his life was short, baby Charlie deserved every minute.”
How could you say this when the only minutes he endured outside of the womb were full of suffering?
His survival through PAIN was only used to provide comfort for the mother.
This is supposed to be pro life?
Doctors recommended abortion for baby Charlie.
His parents refused.
Baby Charlie survived for 2 hours outside of the womb.
He felt his mother hold his hand.
He opened his eyes.
He breathed on his own.
He reacted to his parents’ touch.
He even cried after it was said he wouldn’t.
Even though his life was short, baby Charlie deserved every minute.
These two perspectives are not mutually exclusive.
Someone may also have an abortion despite not being “ready” for one.
Just as someone may have a baby despite not being “ready” for one.
Yes. For the person undergoing the amputation.
Not a family member who wishes for this person’s limb not to be amputated.
The whole point is that you can’t choose what happens to someone *else’s* body.
Replying to @AntosteIIa @Appalachian0724
Involuntary surgical amputation isn’t legal. Neither should be abortion.
The only thing that would convince me to be “pro-life”, is definitive proof that abortion has a universal, adverse effect on women.
Until that is provided, focusing on anything other than the woman's health and choice is redundant.
Dawg… they’re not even trying anymore lmfao
Replying to @AntosteIIa
You sound like a failed abortion. You're parents never loved you and you have a loose vagina.
Abortion is justified for what it is. The reasons don’t matter.
A woman can choose to sever the dependency another human has on her body in whatever way is necessary.
This same standard applies to all humans.





























