I was a Muslim and became a Christian. This is my major presentation of how Islam and Christianity are completely different. They're not even close. Watch and share! youtu.be/aslqSDmf__s?is=05HU…

I know exactly what you are trying to do, Jake. Most Christian debaters do not see it, but I see it very well. Because I know your thinking and your problem inside out, and I know why you want to go after the Trinity. That is the only place you can go. You deceive your own Muslim followers and listeners by focusing on the pronounced Nicene doctrine of the Trinity. Because the Trinity is the safest place where you can use academic and even church-affirmed opinion of a developed doctrine, and you want to exploit that for your own Islamic narrative by twisting what this development means. It doesn't matter whether the Trinity developed at Nicaea or not. For the sake of the argument, it wouldn't even matter IF the Trinity was invented at Nicaea, which it most certainly was NOT. Because when you falsely say that the Trinity arose in Nicaea, you lead your own audience to believe that the belief in the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit emerged in Nicaea in the 300s. You know very well that the belief in the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit was mainstream Christianity in the first century, expressed in the Didache, by Ignatius of Antioch, and even affirmed in the New Testament itself. You know very well that, without a shadow of a doubt, mainline Christians from their earliest days believed in the divinity of Jesus and invoked the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. This entirely destroys your Islamic narrative that the followers of Jesus were Islamic believers of Islamic Tawhid. You know very well that all accounts completely refute this narrative. You know very well that academics refute this narrative. You know very well that your own eyes and your own ears refute this narrative. But you don't want to admit it, which is why you want to distract from it and focus on the strict formulation of the Trinitarian doctrine at Nicea. We both know that Islam doesn't fit anywhere into the early history of Christianity. We both know that the followers of Jesus believed that he is God, and that the vast majority of Christians believed in the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit. You cannot handle this fact, as it destroys your Islamic narrative, which is why you want to focus on Nicea even when your dumb revisionist perspective completely fails there as well. Islam is a distortion of the truth and you happily lie for it. You will never actually debate this topic.

Muslim debaters are so dishonest. Here is me explaining the Didache as a document to a Muslim last month.