You can pretend all you want on the intellectual front. The numbers speak for themselves. Study after study, data source after data source, they repeatedly show in detail women choose abortion for reasons of life style and convenience.

You say "When does a woman's right over her own body end." But are rights granted or inherent? Your position suggest you hold rights are granted. What proof do you have that: (1) they are owed a right to abortion? (2) they are owed any granted rights? Granted or inherent?

The institute analyzed public data from various states, accounting for over 123,000 abortions. Then you make some nonsense response to pretend as if you made a point. Other studies show similar results, that almost all abortions are for reasons of life style or inconvenience.

Please. You say 'It can be interpreted as women saying yes to sexually aggressive behavior [from others] without further context you fucking bot.' but the chart clearly says "by threatening him"

Lol

You "clearly" can't "read" [sarcasm] Clearly the chart annotation is someone else pointing how feminist generally treat such behaviors, as admitted to by women (which anyone can read as it is clearly written). You have no excuse.

Sure seems like your lying.

they are materially different. one is a happenstance of biology, and another is a premeditated intentional killing of another human.

"Autonomy" of your preferred party is more important by what measure? Because you feel that way, or because you have an argument? Cannot even justify your position so you block me?

So it is magically not alive prior to birth? What was it before then? Undead?

There is a fundamental difference between a miscarriage and intentionally killing another person.

Whom is going to build it? Women? Whom is going to enforce the laws to make sure nothing is stolen? Women? Whom is going to suffer the injuries if not deaths from the related work place injuries? Women?