Geopolitics of AI | International Security | Foreign Policy. @MIGSinstitute @MLInstitute @CU_NPSIA @Pendulumgroupca @superforecaster @statecraftOrg

Canada
Joined October 2009
When I taught geopolitics of AI this year (twice!) at @CU_NPSIA the classes were oversubscribed in both cases so I am offering a two-day (online) workshop on the geopolitics of AI through NPSIA-PT&D on February 4 and 5 (registration link in the next post). What are the geopolitical implications of AI? How AI capabilities translate into geopolitical leverage and vulnerability? What are the national-security implications of transformative AI (including AGI and ASI), including cyber risks, military adoption, loss of control, power concentration, and international crisis instability? These and more are some of the questions we'll cover in the workshop. If you are interested please do go ahead and register and share this with those who might be interested in understanding the geopolitical implications of this truly transformative technology. Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions.
2
2
3
29,052
Balkan Devlen retweeted
Vucic concedes defeat. The true scale of the Student List victory remains to be seen — but this a political earthquake for the Western Balkans. Sincere congratulations to the citizens of Serbia who held out hope against hope and mobilized in extraordinary numbers.
1
234
10
1,192
33,688
The daughter of a key Russian Shahed drone producer is reportedly living comfortably in Toronto, having attended Humber Polytechnic and now working as an online influencer. Canada must sanction him and investigate her status. newsukraine.rbc.ua/news/osin…
While Russian drones strike Ukraine, the daughter of a Russian drone executive lives her best life in Toronto. 🧵 1/11 ⬇️
24
578
18
1,413
37,055
Balkan Devlen retweeted
'Today, after nearly five years of war, and 22 months of the second Trump administration, the mental map guiding Russian strategy has changed. First, Russia now sees Europe, instead of the United States, as its principal geopolitical adversary, a shift that has driven Russia’s defense establishment to call for an approach known as “castling” to deal with the main threats. Related to this, Moscow now attributes new strategic agency to Europe itself because of the dramatic military modernization taking place in many European countries and the growing interest among some European leaders in developing or extending their own nuclear deterrent. A third shift concerns Russia’s theory of deterrence: Moscow’s traditional understanding of nuclear coercion is giving way to new thinking about nonnuclear strategic deterrence using advanced conventional weapons systems aimed at Europe. ... One of the most notable trends in Russian strategic thought over the past year has been the emergence of the idea of “castling.” A term borrowed from chess, castling in geopolitics describes the repositioning of forces and resources to optimize a state’s strategic posture. Moscow’s defense experts have used the concept to describe a strategy for dealing with a new reality: for the first time since World War II, they have argued, Europe, rather than the United States, has become Russia’s principal geopolitical adversary. According to this view, European countries are now the principal source of Ukraine’s military capacity, political resolve, and strategic resilience; it is Europe and not the United States that has made Ukraine its proxy and is encouraging Kyiv to pursue Moscow’s strategic defeat. As a consequence, Moscow must direct coercive pressure at Europe—its elites, its decision-making centers, and its critical infrastructure. By doing so, Russia can instill into Europe’s calculus what theorists in Moscow call a “deterring fear”: a European reluctance to antagonize Russia through further support to Ukraine. Such action, they argue, can also rebuild Russian credible deterrence for long-term competition with the West, which is now centered on Europe. .... Drawing on this experience, Russian military theoreticians center NNSD on using massive, deep, precision strikes against the adversary’s critical military, political, and economic infrastructure. The strategy, they suggest, should be aimed not only at Ukraine but also at its European supporters. Although the exact contours of NNSD are still emerging, the concept appears to be more escalatory than the hybrid warfare and deniable asymmetric campaigns that Russia is currently pursuing in Europe.'
20
186
17
567
55,163
#DoubleTrouble @MLInstitute is back. In this episode I talked with @AaronGBurnett @DSI_Strategy on how to #MakeRussiaPay. ~$20 billion CAD of the aggressor #Russia’s money that #Canada can confiscate is sitting there. Why the Liberal government is not taking the lead in #G7?
5
12
860
As I argued in a piece published in early 2021, #DoubleTrouble is here and they are at war with us, whether we want it or not. @MLInstitute
Replying to @nickschifrin
“We have frankly all collectively perhaps underestimated the magnitude of this emerging axis and the strategic impact it’s having… These growing webs of sanctions evasion, tech sharing, disinformation, collusion, coordination, potentially in the area of sabotage across that spectrum of hybrid warfare, there was more going on than we were attuned to.” “Putin is in the process of regaining the momentum in [Ukraine], thanks in part to the infusion of North Korean troops.” “We won’t take the disruptive deterring types of measures that we need to pick apart this axis as we need to, until we shift our mindsets… and become more assertive… If we don’t face up to the reality that Putin is only still in the war in Ukraine today because of China’s economic and dual use support, we’re not going to fashion effective strategies for countering China’s strategic ambitions.” “I think driving wedges between them is pretty fanciful”
1
4
1,430
The new episode of #DoubleTrouble is out! In this episode I talked with @EHunterChristie on why West's obsession with escalation management is the wrong framework to understand and deal with #Russia and what needs to replace it. @MLInstitute youtu.be/s_K0zS3-B54
3
6
905
Balkan Devlen retweeted
Sure, the bros using it can be annoying, but I actually think it’s good to use “prior” for “belief”. It implies that belief is inherently dynamic, & it adopts the language of Bayesianism, our best model of optimal belief change There’s some value to being reflexively open-minded
next person who says 'prior' when they just mean 'belief' is gonna get a kick to their 'posterior'
1
3
19
2,205