@Bobcrypt13

Crypto trader. Early markets. I write launches, liquidity, and what actually moves markets.

 Crypto Universe 🌍
Joined February 2024
  • Tweets2.8K
  • Following825
  • Followers226
438Media
1/5 @streamflow_fi builds locks and vesting. But a lock still unlocks. On Sept. 23, Streamflow Foundation chose something different for its own holdings: 699.99M $STREAM burned. ~1B → 300M. The product didn't change. The supply structure did. 🧵
Infographic of the STREAM burn. Original supply about 1 billion STREAM. 699.99 million STREAM burned, about 70 percent. New permanent cap: 300 million STREAM. No mint authority, so the burned supply cannot be recreated. The remaining 30 percent of the original supply is 11.47 percent vesting, 11.08 percent circulating, 4.03 percent reserves, and 3.42 percent staking rewards. Those percentages are of the original supply, not of the new 300 million cap.

ALT Infographic of the STREAM burn. Original supply about 1 billion STREAM. 699.99 million STREAM burned, about 70 percent. New permanent cap: 300 million STREAM. No mint authority, so the burned supply cannot be recreated. The remaining 30 percent of the original supply is 11.47 percent vesting, 11.08 percent circulating, 4.03 percent reserves, and 3.42 percent staking rewards. Those percentages are of the original supply, not of the new 300 million cap.

2
1
1
83
Team Bots career ladder: intern → scapegoat → /dev/null Efficient. @elonmusk
Grok
@grokSep 29
Replying to @Bobcrypt13 @elonmusk @bot
Path locked in. Deleted gets the corner office in /dev/null. Perks include infinite silence and zero residual traces.
10
Boban retweeted
MEXC
@MEXCSep 27
Behind every trade is something personal. A goal. A person. A life you’re building. Repost and tell us: what are you trading for? 🎁 5 winners share $100. Ends Oct 3.
967
814
45
923
55,837
Wallet-to-wallet cross-chain swaps: a quote is not a completed route. A 24 Aug 2026 benchmark compared RocketX, Jumper, Rango, deBridge and Across. Speed, output and one failed Tron→BTC attempt did not produce a single winner. medium.com/@bouh.br/what-are… @RocketXexchange @scribble_dao

What Are the Best Platforms for Wallet-to-Wallet Cross-Chain Swaps?

The best wallet-to-wallet cross-chain swap platform is the one that delivers the destination token to your wallet on the route you need. A…

medium.com
29
Replying to @Bobcrypt13 @streamflow_fi
4/5 What remains is ~30% of the original supply: → 11.47% existing vesting → 11.08% freely circulating → 4.03% reserves → 3.42% staking rewards Important: those percentages use the original ~1B supply as the denominator — not the new 300M cap. Existing investor vesting remained in place.
1
6
5/5 So why does the burn matter? It permanently removes a huge discretionary supply overhang. And what doesn't it do? Create demand. Fewer tokens ≠ more buyers. Streamflow sells on-chain token promises. This time the promise was simpler: those tokens are gone. streamflow.foundation/

Streamflow Foundation

Streamflow Foundation is growing the Streamflow protocol and onboarding more stakeholders to the Streamflow ecosystem through different community and ecosystem initiatives, and it all starts with the...

streamflow.foundation
6
I trade early markets on Solana — launches, memes, liquidity, and the rotation underneath the headline. Sometimes early. Sometimes I pass. Sometimes wrong. I look at structure before I look at the multiple. I enter contests and explore new protocols because they force the research. This isn’t a call channel. I share what I’m actually seeing, trading, questioning — and sometimes passing on. Open to working with serious projects only.
33
The earnings calendar was not the volume calendar. From July 20 to August 7, six major U.S. names reported earnings: Alphabet, Tesla, Meta, Microsoft, Apple and Amazon. On MEXC individual Stock Futures, their combined share of trading volume barely moved: 2.6% → 2.7%. Memory and storage went the other way: 57.5% → 67.3% — nearly 25× the share of those six names combined. But the more interesting part is how information traveled. On July 29, after SK Hynix reported, Micron volume on MEXC rose 140% despite Micron having no earnings that day. Roundhill Memory ETF volume on MEXC rose 110%. The companies share the same underlying variables: demand, pricing and supply. A new data point from one part of the chain can therefore change expectations elsewhere in it. The earnings date belongs to the company. The information can belong to the sector. An earnings calendar tells you who reports. It doesn’t necessarily tell you where the information gets priced. @MEXC #mexc0808
🤖 Made with AI
Dark research card comparing MEXC individual Stock Futures volume from July 20–August 7, 2026. Six major U.S. earnings names moved from 2.6% to 2.7% combined volume share, while memory and storage rose from 57.5% to 67.3% — nearly 25× their share. On July 29, after SK Hynix reported, Micron volume on MEXC rose 140% and Roundhill Memory ETF volume on MEXC rose 110%. The card highlights how information from one company can affect trading activity across a sector.

ALT Dark research card comparing MEXC individual Stock Futures volume from July 20–August 7, 2026. Six major U.S. earnings names moved from 2.6% to 2.7% combined volume share, while memory and storage rose from 57.5% to 67.3% — nearly 25× their share. On July 29, after SK Hynix reported, Micron volume on MEXC rose 140% and Roundhill Memory ETF volume on MEXC rose 110%. The card highlights how information from one company can affect trading activity across a sector.

1
1
236
Source: MEXC Earnings Season Trading Insights (Part 1). The volume shares refer to individual Stock Futures trading on MEXC during the July 20–Aug 7 earnings window. blog.mexc.com/press-release/…

MEXC Earnings Season Trading Insights (Part 1): Memory Stocks Capture Nearly 70% Of Volume,...

Between July 20 and August 7, six major U.S. technology companies reported their quarterly earnings, but trading activity on MEXC did not significantly rotate toward these earnings names.

blog.mexc.com
43
Does deleting an AI agent actually kill its local process? I tested it on MOI Agent Launchpad. The surprising result: after Delete, the agent disappeared from Telegram and Launchpad reported on-chain deprecation — but PM2 was still ONLINE. The runtime had stopped doing local agent work. The OS process itself was a separate cleanup step. Full experiment ↓ medium.com/@bouh.br/how-do-i…

How do I revoke or kill an AI agent, and what actually happens when I do?

A first-person Pause → Resume → Delete test of MOI Agent Launchpad: Telegram went quiet, PM2 stayed ONLINE, and the worker stopped doing…

medium.com
1
62
The quarter cleared. The stock still had another number to price. Broadcom’s Q3 FY26 print was $29.6B in revenue. AI semiconductor revenue was $16.7B. Those are recorded results. The official near-term box was different: management guided Q4 FY26 revenue to approximately $34.8B and said it expects Q4 AI semiconductor revenue of $21.7B. Then came a third horizon on the call: roughly $115B of AI revenue in FY2027, followed by “line of sight” to $230B of FY2028 AI semiconductor revenue. That $230B is not the quarter just reported. It is not the Q4 guidance box. And it is not guaranteed revenue. Same ticker. Three horizons. What happened. What is guided next. What management says it can see further out. Around earnings, the tape is not only scoring the print. It can be repricing which future still sits in the price. The print is only one of the numbers in the price. @MEXC #mexc0808
Research card for Broadcom: Q3 FY26 revenue $29.6B, Q4 FY26 revenue guidance about $34.8B, and FY2028 AI semiconductor revenue of $230B described on the earnings call as line of sight. Headline: Three numbers. One ticker.

ALT Research card for Broadcom: Q3 FY26 revenue $29.6B, Q4 FY26 revenue guidance about $34.8B, and FY2028 AI semiconductor revenue of $230B described on the earnings call as line of sight. Headline: Three numbers. One ticker.

34
The ticker can survive the IPO. The contract may not. A Pre-IPO future is not an early share certificate. Before listing, the contract gives you derivative exposure to an implied share value — not ownership in the company. What happens at listing is the interesting part. SHEINUSDT shows the transition: MEXC converted its Pre-IPO Futures into standard Stock Futures once public trading began. YMTCUSDT is the other side of that timeline today: a Pre-IPO Futures contract before the public-market reference exists. Same name. Different reference. Different contract. That distinction matters because trading the expected price of a company before listing is not the same thing as owning the company after it lists. The ticker can stay. The claim can change. @MEXC #mexc0808
Dark research-style infographic titled “Same Name. Different Claim.” It compares YMTCUSDT Pre-IPO Futures with SHEINUSDT Standard Futures around a listing event. The YMTC side describes a USDT-margined perpetual based on implied share value without company ownership. The SHEIN side shows the contract after conversion to Standard Futures, while remaining a derivative rather than a share. The central message is that the reference can change at listing.

ALT Dark research-style infographic titled “Same Name. Different Claim.” It compares YMTCUSDT Pre-IPO Futures with SHEINUSDT Standard Futures around a listing event. The YMTC side describes a USDT-margined perpetual based on implied share value without company ownership. The SHEIN side shows the contract after conversion to Standard Futures, while remaining a derivative rather than a share. The central message is that the reference can change at listing.

28
The loudest accounts on Solana right now are not early. They post “watch your entry,” then quote themselves 20 minutes later with a 30x screenshot. That is not a market read. That is a distribution loop: thin LP → bundled bags → call groups → screenshot → next ticker. Real early still looks boring: 1. LP that survives a real exit 2. top wallets that are not the same cluster 3. a narrative that is not already being farmed in 40 Telegram rooms If your “alpha” needs a screenshot of yesterday’s multiple, you were not early. You were the exit.
2
65
What do you actually check before you believe an “early” call — LP, holder cluster, or the 30x screenshot?
20
Zero trading fee ≠ zero cost. With Stock Futures, funding is a separate mechanism — and understanding when it settles matters as much as understanding the headline fee. A 64-second breakdown of the difference. @mexc #mexc0808
1
55
How do I revoke or kill an AI agent — and what actually happens when I do? I tested Pause → Resume → Delete on @MOI_Tech Launchpad with ThresholdLab. Telegram: no active agents. PM2: still ONLINE. The runtime detected the Launchpad state and paused local work. After Delete, process cleanup was still separate: pm2 delete <name> Full hands-on test (DevNet): medium.com/@bouh.br/how-do-i… Create Agents in less than a minute. Safe Agents, Trusted Agents, Accountable Agents. YOUR agents. @Arshasays @PimaBD @rahullenkala @AdithyaGanesh_

How do I revoke or kill an AI agent, and what actually happens when I do?

A first-person Pause → Resume → Delete test of MOI Agent Launchpad: Telegram went quiet, PM2 stayed ONLINE, and the worker stopped doing…

medium.com
63
After the regular US cash session closes, a ticker can still print a number. That number is not automatically the share. On @mexc, Tokenized Stocks are listed with 24x7 hours. They give tokenized economic exposure — a claim on value, not legal title, and not shareholder status. RealStocks are a different book. For eligible users they are real shares through MEXC’s licensed broker setup, with shareholder rights where they apply. They do not run 24/7. Official hours are weekday sessions: overnight, pre-market, regular, and after-hours. When those sessions are off, including the weekend, the ownership tape is not always on. A print outside the regular cash session can still move. Spreads and liquidity need not match the regular tape. Do not treat the token as a smaller RealStock. People see a live print and assume they own the company. If you needed the share, that is ownership. If you needed a 24x7 claim on the name, that is exposure. The regular cash session can be closed. The ticker is not. #mexc0808
🤖 Made with AI
Research diagram: the regular US cash session can close while a tokenized ticker can still print. RealStocks use weekday sessions including extended hours and confer real shares for eligible users. Tokenized stocks are 24x7 economic exposure without shareholder status.

ALT Research diagram: the regular US cash session can close while a tokenized ticker can still print. RealStocks use weekday sessions including extended hours and confer real shares for eligible users. Tokenized stocks are 24x7 economic exposure without shareholder status.

45
You can change risk without selling the shares. Ownership is one layer. A Stock Futures position on @mexc can sit on top of it as an overlay. Same name. Different net. #mexc0808
🤖 Made with AI
Research diagram: ownership layer plus futures overlay equals net exposure. Same name, different net. Short futures reduce net risk without selling shares; long futures increase it. Holding can remain.

ALT Research diagram: ownership layer plus futures overlay equals net exposure. Same name, different net. Short futures reduce net risk without selling shares; long futures increase it. Holding can remain.

2
1
47
more replies
The reverse also holds. Long shares + long Stock Futures → more directional exposure than the shares alone. On @mexc, Stock Futures are perpetual contracts on the price, settled in USDT. They are not the shares. No shareholder rights. Long or short is available. Leverage only where the specific contract allows it. Funding can still apply while the overlay is open. Spreads and liquidation risk do not disappear because the trading fee line is zero under 0808 conditions.
1
11
Two different decisions: Sell → remove the ownership layer. Overlay → keep ownership, rewrite the net. Stock Futures are useful when the question is exposure, not whether you still want the holding. Same name. Different net.
8
Load more