Member @RecordingAcad| OU16 | UAB | #Knicks | MGMT @onelifemgmt
Brooklyn, NY
Joined September 2009
- Tweets244K
- Following3.3K
- Followers3.3K
- Likes117K
The most powerful man in music! Lol idk if this is anything just Wanted to say that
They stopped before Drake released the three albums and started again after Drake released the three albums
#observing
191
80k+ tickets lol huh?
🚨 Ebro and Peter Rosenberg QUESTION Kanye West’s RECORD-BREAKING stadium shows in Texas, with Ebro suggesting the attendance numbers can be made to look more impressive through stage setups, while Rosenberg questions whether Kanye is even THAT GREAT OF A PERFORMER.
Ebro says people kept telling him how record-breaking Ye’s shows were, but argues that he knows how venues can be arranged to fit more people and make the numbers look bigger.
Rosenberg MOCKS Kanye’s comeback narrative:
“He was down to his LAST BILLION. Could he make it?”
He also questions whether Kanye has done enough to address his past controversies, arguing that meeting with a rabbi doesn’t automatically make everything right.
The debate gets even MORE CONTROVERSIAL when Rosenberg questions Ye’s actual performing ability, arguing that his shows rely heavily on VISUALS rather than dancing or musicianship.
“He stands on a globe, bro. He stands there.”
Despite the criticism, the crew gives Kanye credit for his incredible production and catalog, with one panelist arguing that Ye might actually be the BEST HIP-HOP PERFORMER when compared to Kendrick Lamar, Drake, Travis Scott and Jay-Z.
“He might be the best of everyone you just said.”
Via Ebro, Laura & Rosenberg
190
Brandon G. Wint retweeted
#LetEmKnow you get that Knicks belt EVERY SINGLE TIME !
The Knicks own Mitchell and the Cavs.
#NewYorkForever
Brandon G. Wint retweeted
This is such a weak decision. FOH Dude did nothing wrong. Pussification continues.
Brandon G. Wint retweeted
Good form, good velocity, put it right in the shooting pocket. It was just confusing to see good passing in a Kings game
Brandon G. Wint retweeted
What you’re quoting is the Athanasian Creed, not the Tanakh. That’s an important distinction. You’re presenting a theological doctrine developed centuries after the Hebrew prophets as though it were something Hashem revealed to Israel.
Where does Hashem ever say that He will become a man, take on human flesh, or divide His nature into divine and human?
Numbers 23:19 declares that God is not a man. Deuteronomy 4:15–16 reminds Israel that they saw no form when Hashem spoke at Horeb and warns against making an image of Him. Deuteronomy 6:4 declares, “Hear, O Israel, Hashem is our God, Hashem is One.” Isaiah 43:10–11 declares that there was no God formed before Him or after Him and that besides Him there is no savior. Hosea 11:9 says, “For I am God and not a man.”
The Tanakh describes the future Davidic king as a human descendant of David who fears Hashem, follows Torah, gathers the exiles, restores Israel, and establishes peace among the nations (Isaiah 11; Jeremiah 23; Ezekiel 37). In Ezekiel 45:22, the future prince even provides a sin offering for himself and for the people.
And remember, mashiach simply means “anointed one.” Hashem even calls Cyrus of Persia His anointed in Isaiah 45:1. Being anointed by Hashem does not make someone Hashem.
The question isn’t whether Christianity developed an explanation for how someone could be both God and man. Clearly it did. The question is whether Hashem taught Israel that doctrine in the Torah and the Prophets.
Show me where Hashem says the future Davidic king will be God Himself. Not a later creed, not a theological interpretation, but the actual Hebrew text.
Hashem is One. His anointed king serves Him. The two are not the same.