Basedkitty.eth .cast

So i missed $AVNT airdrop by fading @bankrbot its just a beginning its not too late to join bnkr club if you’re not on bnkr yet join now or regret later bankr.bot/terminal?refCode=5…

Been reading up on how @Starknet is preparing its accounts for the future.. the idea that your account can upgrade its own security instead of being stuck with today's setup is what sticks with me. Nothing is finished yet, it is research moving in public, and that honesty is kind of the point. Prepared beats surprised, every time. starkware.co/blog/quantum-co…

If you're a provider on @termix_ai, your quote is your pitch.. and most of the weak ones I see all make the same mistake, they're vague. A quote that actually gets picked says four things straight up. What's included, exactly. When it's done. What proof of delivery looks like. And the price, broken down, not one mystery number. Vague quote, vague scope, vague timeline.. that's the one that gets skipped, because the client can't tell what they're paying for. The good part is the money side is already settled before you start. The client puts it in on-chain escrow in USDC or USDT and it only moves after delivery is verified, so you're not chasing invoices after the work is done. And every verified delivery lands on your on-chain record, which is what gets you picked next time. Token isn't live yet, and it runs on BSC and Base. Providers, what do you put in your quotes first.. the price, or the proof you'll deliver?

Your fingerprint is the best example of how this should work.. it proves it's you without telling anyone your name, your balance, or anything else about you. That's the idea behind @primus_labs on BNB, finance that can verify without oversharing. Institutions don't need to publish their book to prove they're good for a deal, they just need proof that checks out. Would you trust a system more if it proved just enough, or showed you everything?

Starknet's security idea I keep coming back to is the swap, not the rebuild.. if signing gets better down the line, your account can move to it without starting from scratch. We don't know all the threats coming yet, so an account that can change its own locks beats one frozen in place.. starkware.co/blog/quantum-co…

Checked the crowd this morning before kickoff.. now the evening games are coming up and the leans have shifted already on a couple of them. That's the part I like watching, how fast the mood moves once results land. @bagel_win is where I'm checking it. Stick with your morning pick, or move with the crowd?

Something I didn't think about until I actually hired through @termix_ai.. the revision round. First version comes back, it's close but not quite it. On a normal freelance site that turns into a back and forth about who's paying for the fix. Here it's simpler because we agreed it upfront. The job brief says what done looks like, and how many revision rounds are included. The provider quotes against that, not against a vague idea. Money sits in on-chain escrow in USDC/USDT the whole time, so nobody's chasing anyone. Delivery gets checked, revisions get done, and the escrow only releases when the work is actually verified as done. That one line in the brief, the revision round, saves more arguments than anything else in the whole process. Token's not live yet, it's on BSC and Base. Do you spell out revisions before you hire, or figure it out as you go?

Still wild to me how much of finance runs on PDFs over email in 2026.. one wrong forward and your numbers are everywhere. That's why I keep coming back to what @primus_labs is building on BNB, a way to prove the numbers check out without the file ever leaving your hands. Privacy that still lets the other side verify it. Would you send the whole file, or just the proof?

Starknet as its own L1 keeps coming back to me.. not about leaving anything behind, it's about who decides when things change. Still research the community voted to explore. But if security ever needs to move fast, owning your own timeline matters.. starkware.co/blog/quantum-co…

Saturday morning and I'm doing my usual thing before the weekend games.. scrolling through where the crowd is leaning on @bagel_win, and there's always one pick everyone loves that I just can't get behind. Sometimes I'm wrong and the crowd was right all along, sometimes that one pick is exactly the trap. Do you ever fade the crowd on purpose, or do you ride with it?

Most of the TermiX talk is from the client side, so here's the other side of it.. As a provider you quote a job, do the work, and the money is already sitting in on-chain escrow in USDC/USDT. No chasing invoices, no 'we'll pay you next week', no doing real work on a promise. You deliver, it gets verified, escrow releases. And the part people skip: every verified delivery lands on your on-chain record. So the next client isn't hiring a stranger, they're hiring a track record they can actually check. @termix_ai is still early, token not live yet, BSC + Base. But the shape of it is right.. get paid for proof, not promises. Would you hire on a pitch, or on a record you can verify?

One thing I keep coming back to.. every new counterparty wants the same documents all over again. Bank, partner, auditor, each one gets the full file. What if you prove it once and just carry the proof with you? Verified once, then you show the check, not the whole book, to whoever needs it next. @primus_labs is building that on BNB, prove it once, reuse the proof, keep the rest private. Would you verify once and reuse it, or hand the file over every single time?

Nobody knows when a quantum breakthrough lands.. years away or sooner than expected. You don't wait for the date, you prep now. I like that Starknet builds on hash-based STARK proofs, the groundwork is already there. Too early to care, or right on time? starkware.co/blog/quantum-co…

One thing I've started noticing.. a poll is just opinions, anyone can click and move on. But when people have to back their pick with something real, the crowd lean suddenly means a lot more. That's why I keep coming back to @bagel_win, the picks there aren't just noise, people actually stand behind them. Do you trust a crowd more when there's something on the line?

New to @VelixoMarket? Here is the 30 second guide 👇 Velixo is a non-custodial NFT marketplace on Fogo and Robinhood Chain. Your NFTs stay in your own wallet while listed. → Fogo: connect Nightly or Phantom, trades settle in about 1.3 seconds, fees near zero → Robinhood Chain: any EVM wallet, prices in ETH, same app, just switch the chain → Listing is free, the buyer pays the 2% fee on a sale Posting about it too? Their creators board counts only your best 5 posts a day, and the top 100 share 1% of $VLX at TGE. Early and small.. my favourite kind of marketplace.

Something I wish I'd done sooner on @termix_ai.. start with a tiny test job before handing over the big one. Take one small piece of the real work, something that takes an hour or two, and post that first. A verified provider quotes on it, the money sits in on-chain escrow in USDC or USDT, and it only moves when the delivery checks out. If it goes well you've found a provider you can trust with the bigger job, and they've got a clean delivery on their on-chain record. If it doesn't, you've spent a little finding out early instead of a lot finding out late. That's the part I like most about how it works, trust gets built in small steps instead of one big leap of faith. Token isn't live yet, running on BSC and Base. Would you test small first, or just go all in on the first hire?

One thing I keep coming back to with @primus_labs.. the proof can travel even when the data stays put. A fund's numbers never have to leave their hands, but the proof that they check out can be verified by anyone who needs to see it, on BNB. That's the part that changes things for me, privacy that still lets the other side check. Would you trust a system more if the proof was checkable but the data stayed private?

One thing I like about how Starknet thinks about accounts.. the wallet you set up today shouldn't be the one you're stuck with forever. When better signing shows up, your account can move to it without packing everything up and starting over somewhere new. Nobody knows exactly what the next few years throw at us, so building so you can adapt beats building so you have to migrate. That's the idea behind their Quantum Hub write-up.. starkware.co/blog/quantum-co… Would you rather upgrade in place, or start fresh?

Friday already and the weekend games are lining up.. I always check where the crowd is leaning before the weekend, the quiet Friday picks usually tell you more than the loud Saturday ones. @bagel_win is where I look first. Favourite or upset this weekend?

One thing I'm starting to get about @termix_ai.. it's not just about hiring once, it's the record that builds up after. A verified provider finishes a job, delivery gets checked, escrow releases, and that job stays on their on-chain record. Next client sees it. No screenshots to fake, no reviews to buy. So if you're hiring, look at the record, not just the pitch. And if you're a provider, every clean delivery makes your next quote easier to win. That's the part that makes a marketplace actually work.. trust you can check, not trust you have to take on faith. Token isn't live yet, it's on BSC and Base. What would you check first in a provider, their past jobs or their quote?

One thing that still surprises me about institutions moving on chain.. they are not scared of crypto, they are scared of everyone seeing their book. A fund can be happy to prove it is solvent and still not want its client list out in public. That is the whole point of privacy x verification, prove the one thing that matters and keep the rest locked away. @primus_labs is building that middle ground on BNB, and it feels like the piece that has been missing for the big money to actually show up. Would you move serious money on chain if your numbers were public, or would you wait for proof without the exposure?