Buck's4thRule

🚨THIS IS WHAT VOTER ROLL “MAINTENANCE” LOOKS LIKE IN UTAH Unverified, unconfirmed ~5k Utah voters were still able to cast ballots on November 3. These were the legacy records Henderson’s citizenship review couldn’t confirm; old registrations missing DL or SSN4 data, so they received ballots anyway. Is this the gold standard? The state then posted one of the largest shifts to blue in a national wave. Could it be the bloated, hard-to-inspect rolls that keep sending out blank-check mail ballots? 🚩And Henderson only ran roughly 71k–75k records through the SAVE database, not the full 2+ million. After the Driver License Division pass confirmed most, only that unmatched slice got the federal check. Thousands still couldn’t be verified, and more lacked usable data. This is just one reason @phil_lyman’s PILF-backed NVRA lawsuit is so critical to the state of Utah: forcing full public access to the voter rolls so independent review can test the list-maintenance claims instead of relying on selective checks and privacy designations that hide large portions of the data. Let’s have elections, not selections in Utah. 🇺🇸 Please consider donating to this critical cause: givesendgo.com/help-phil-lym…

Legislative Audit Confirms Lyman’s Claims: SPENCER COX FALLS SHORT ON SIGNATURES! The Legislative Audit Committee ordered an audit of the signatures Spencer Cox gathered to qualify for the primary election. Although the audit is still in progress, auditors have informed the legislature that Cox likely failed to collect the required number of signatures. As with most audits, a statistical review was conducted to guide the full investigation, and this initial review—by the Office of the Legislative Auditor General—strongly suggests that Cox did not meet the necessary threshold. In stark contrast, Phil Lyman clearly qualified for the general election ballot by winning the Republican State Convention with 68% of the delegate vote. It’s deeply ironic that those who disqualify candidates over technicalities and reject thousands of ballots based on questionable postmark dates are now bending over backward to excuse Cox, who appears to have failed to meet a fundamental legal requirement. The media and some elected officials rushing to make excuses for Cox couldn’t be more blatant in their bias. To those defending Cox, we say: Stop it. Stop distorting the audit findings, stop gaslighting the public, and stop pushing false narratives. The auditors’ findings are clear: Spencer Cox likely failed to gather 28,000 valid signatures. Claims that Cox "did everything asked of him" or that he couldn’t submit more signatures after allegedly reaching the threshold are undermining the people of Utah. When we hear, "We’ll fix this in four years so it doesn’t happen again" or "Better luck next time," it’s nothing but political deflection. Cox, the first incumbent governor in Utah history to fail to qualify for a primary at the convention, opted to gather signatures instead. The fact that he could have submitted more signatures if he knew he was short is irrelevant—he failed to meet the legal requirement. We are thus baffled by the statements from legislative and executive leaders that Cox “fulfilled the requirements to qualify to be on the ballot.” This audit shows precisely the opposite.  At this point, it’s evident: Cox did not qualify, and the ballots need to be reprinted. We call on the Utah GOP and Cox's supporters to prioritize transparency and accountability in our elections. If they fail to do so, the actions of the legislature, judiciary, State Records Committee, and all those pushing the false narrative that Cox qualified should be recognized for what they are—a farce. We committed to verifying the election before accepting the results, and we stand by that. We hope Utah stands with us. One way to do that is to contact your elected officials and urge them not to certify the election until these critical questions are answered. Another way is to write in Phil Lyman for Governor.

ALASKA GETS UTAHED Except Utah’s came with an alleged $1,000 + 🥩 dinner bribe and a statewide coverup. In Alaska, a second Dan Sullivan showed up on the ballot in what Republicans call a calculated voter-confusion play. In Utah, after Phil Lyman beat the convention and forced a primary against Spencer Cox, an unrelated Richard Lyman (and his mother Carol) filed as write-in candidates for governor and lieutenant governor at the absolute last minute. Phil’s campaign released a coworker’s affidavit and texts claiming Richard said the Cox campaign offered him $1,000 and a 🥩 dinner to run specifically “to mess with Phil Lyman’s campaign.” That is illegal under Utah law. Cox’s people called it “blatantly false.” Not one member of Utah GOP leadership, the federal delegation, or the legislature publicly demanded answers or an investigation; especially Mike Lee, who had already locked arms with Cox and told everyone the primary was over and it was time to unite. Silence. Then the media did its part: stories about “Lyman dropping out” routinely used Phil’s photo instead of Richard’s or Carol’s. Lt. Gov. Deidre Henderson (Cox’s running mate and the state’s chief election officer) sent the required email to registered Republicans announcing that Richard Kennedy Lyman and Carol Ann Lyman had withdrawn and that votes for them would not count. Voters flooded Phil’s campaign saying they thought he had quit. Henderson’s office clarified the obvious after the damage, but the confusion was already baked in. Name-alike candidates + last-minute filing + alleged inducement + media sloppiness + official email that further muddied the waters + total silence from every elected Republican who could have spoken = the exact playbook used to protect the incumbent. The lawsuit was later dismissed on free-speech grounds without a trial on the merits. No criminal probe. No accountability. Just the same people who run the elections and the party telling everyone to move on.