Bred from woke trans mice. #Bitcoin fixes fiat jobs. Also shitposting. Science is a scam, buy magic beans.
Joined June 2023
- Tweets17.9K
- Following2.3K
- Followers1.2K
- Likes10.5K
Bullcrap retweeted
Saying there’s no reason to buy Bitcoin because anyone can create a cryptocurrency is like saying there’s no reason to learn English because anyone can invent a language.
Bullcrap retweeted
❗️ The AfD leak site's thousands of emails shows nazism from party members and staff labeled under racism/antisemitism.
We went through the worst:
1. A 2018 email forwarded by Alexander Gauland concerns a "Hitler-Wallfahrt", a Hitler pilgrimage, by a former judge at the party's Thuringia arbitration court.
2. A member joked in a district WhatsApp group about turning refugees into handbags and boots, an allusion to the Nazi camps.
3. A district chairman quit, saying a board member sent a "Heil Hitler" Christmas card with a swastika and it was laughed off.
4. A Bavarian official urged party leaders to chant "Merkel verrecke", roughly "Merkel, croak", every day.
5. Federal party staff discussed luring a photographer to an event to remove him by force. The thread signs off "Heil und Sieg".
6. A 2025 NRW email is titled "Sale of swastika flags and drugs at the info stand".
7. This year alone, branches moved against members over a Nazi banner with a swastika, a Hitler impression and a call for machine guns against Arab clans.
Bullcrap retweeted
When you hear Trump's team brag about how much they have given to Ukraine, here are the actual numbers.
Bullcrap retweeted
The Shakespearean-level irony of the "captured" Bitcoin hard-fork adventure... 🧵👇
The main mythology bouncing around in the Blake2b hard-fork echo chamber is the idea that "Bitcoin is captured," a narrative @hodlonaut's lengthy 4-part article attempts to document.
To be clear: I'm not saying the thesis claiming corporate interests want to reshape Bitcoin for commercial L2 and L3 utility is wrong. That seems to be a primary driver behind the OP_RETURN limit increase.
However, the whole idea that "Bitcoin was/is/will be captured because the fiat system is terrified of being replaced" relies on a massive main character complex. Hard-forking based on that idea is just delusional.
And, as we shall see, it may have unintended consequences. The "fiat elite" were never shaking in their boots because of a hypothetical hyperbitcoinization because a 7 TPS base layer was never going to run global commerce in the first place.
Even with scaling solutions, the fiat system still survives because modern economies run on credit, sovereign debt, and mandatory tax liabilities denominated in the state’s own token, ultimately enforced by the state's legal monopoly on violence.
Beyond that, Bitcoin can't just jump straight to everyday cash (even if scaling issues were solved). It would first need to succeed and stabilize as a global Store of Value, and it still has a long way to go on that front alone. With retail mostly thinking the train left them behind, there is no way to global SoV without "Big Bitcoin."
Even if Bitcoin eventually succeeds as the ultimate global SoV, moving from that to replacing fiat ("separation of money and state") is a massive structural chasm nobody seems to be able to explain without hand-waving away basic economic realities like sovereign tax enforcement, national debt markets, and the state's monopoly on violence and legal tender.
Wall Street and the "elite rulers" didn't infiltrate Bitcoin to neuter a potential fiat killer. They embraced it because there’s absurd money to be made. ETFs, custodians, and paper derivatives aren't a suppression strategy, they're just Wall Street doing what Wall Street does: turning a scarce asset into a high-fee portfolio hedge.
When the idealistic dream of total fiat replacement slammed into less-than-pure monetary reality, blaming an evil shadow cartel is just easier than admitting that "hyperbitcoinization" was a maxi pipe dream all along. It might be a beautiful and inspiring dream, but a pipe dream all the same.
So, those who wanted to preserve that dream forked off to the Blake-to-be (we'll see) coin. However, by preserving the BTC ledger, they handed "Big Bitcoin" an 8–10% slice of the total supply, essentially giving them a massive free "pre-mine."
"Big Bitcoin" doesn't even need to dump large portions to move the market. Liquidity on a thin budding altcoin is so fragile, they can use a tiny fraction of those free tokens to bully order books, suppress rallies, and short the price at will.
The Blake2b-coiners forked off to escape "capture," only to hand "Big Bitcoin" an infinite supply overhang to manipulate their pet project, and play with it like a toy. There are probably tons of other "challenges" coming on top of that...
Of course, this does not mean Bitcoin doesn't have challenges to face too. However, Bitcoin is the only chance we have at preserving some level of freedom and independence in a corrupt world, despite its integration into the fiat domain not being as "pure" as many hoped.
It would be better to work together to face those challenges than being divided over something that has no basis in reality or chance of succeeding in the first place...
PS. This hilarious post is a good follow-up read: teapawt.net/Bullcrapwork/status/20…
Right, so your thesis for forking Bitcoin is that Blackrock and Strategy control it via some vague unexplained means, but that in the case of Lukecoin where they control literally tens of thousands of % of the liquidity pool, you trust their benevolence to not do anything questionable even though the market is completely unregulated and they have no commitments or responsibilities to clients and customers regarding the underlying asset.
That makes absolutely no fucking sense, you realize that, right?
What kind of a non-response is Coinbase's offering of coins to some parties and no one else? Then they offer them to everyone else too. That doesn't change the mechanics.
Notice, too, that now all of the sudden, exchanges and institutions are afraid of lawsuits but in the case of these same institutions engaging in literal fraud in the Bitcoin ecosystem, these even more severe lawsuits don't phase them at all. Your claim is that Blackrock commits capture and fraud in Bitcoin, the most audited and followed chain on the planet with 1.5T dollars riding on it, but that they won't airdrop coins with no contractual or regulatory burdens on an unregulated market out of fears of lawsuits from a hundred Lukecoiners?
You can see how that doesn't make a lick of sense either, right? What the fuck?
Isn't lending legitimacy to Lukecoin precisely in Blackrock's interest in the event that they can fleece Lukecoiners for the short term benefit you're accusing them of being after in the Bitcoin ecosystem? You realize that saying they'd never do that undermines the premise of forking off in the first place, right?
The loans issue makes no sense, Lukecoin isn't an underlying asset for anything. You gifted them to Blackrock. Bitcoin backed loans are on the Bitcoin blockchain, not on Lukecoin.
And to the point of Blackrock's bookkeeping of their coins, that's fine. If you're going to deny Blackrock not owning 780,000 Bitcoin and that they're lying about it, this pulls the rug out from under the claim that institutions are involved in Bitcoin. If they don't have Bitcoin or claims to Bitcoin at Coinbase, then they don't have Bitcoin or ownership of Bitcoin, meaning again that forking off because of institutional "capture" is pointless because there wouldn't be institutional capture since these institutions wouldn't own any Bitcoin.
How do you not see how mind-numbingly nonsensical these explanations are? Any of them, if true, apply back to Bitcoin, making the original capture claims baseless and the thesis for Lukecoin absolutely pointless.
You can't "ride them out." Blackrock and Strategy's stacks dictate when there's a dip. If there's a dip, it's those "with conviction" who are panic selling. It's you who's selling. It's Blackrock who made you sell. There aren't dips, there's only frenzy and panic at the push of a button. If there's any economic value to be extracted from this shitcoin, it's Blackrock's to capture. Again, your only argument for them to not do it is just wishing they wouldn't, but that somehow they do it carefree in Bitcoin.
The class of conviction buyers gets wiped out when Blackrock unloads 5000 coins on the market. You're telling me you'll buy all 1.5M coins from Strategy and Blackrock, and somehow these scheming banker complexes can't help themselves, they just give you their money?
You can't make sense of this. All of it contradicts every claim Lukecoiners made about Bitcoin. All of them assume that the scheming banker complexes that have fraudulently captured Bitcoin somehow turn into docile money dispensers because you have conviction.
Jesus fucking Christ. Just stop and listen to what you're saying.
Bullcrap retweeted
I'm preparing a fork for you to escape to and be free from centralized Lukecoin.
Do I have your support? No one will be able to mine it. The current supply will just circulate.
The dozen suckers...I mean smart hard money advocates don't need 21M coins.
Bullcrap retweeted
Now let them think they solved decentralized mining while handing all the coins to a couple banks and institutions.
Bullcrap retweeted
Two days ago, we received an update from our shipping provider, ShipMonk. We're deeply saddened to share the news that the recent data breach affects more customers than originally thought.
Another 67,000 customers from the US who ordered between November 2019 and August 2021 were affected, with their full details (name, email, phone number, shipping address, order number) exposed.
All affected customers have been emailed directly. If you didn’t receive an email, then you are not affected.
Throughout our entire relationship with ShipMonk, we repeatedly requested and received written assurance confirming the deletion of the data, in line with our contract, data policy, and past communications. We are very disappointed that, despite receiving this confirmation, the data was not deleted in their systems.
Trezor systems were not compromised, and your device is secure. But please be alert for fake emails, phone calls, fraudulent letters, and potential risks to physical security.
NEVER share your wallet backup with anyone or type it into a website.
We’re terribly sorry to everyone affected. We take this matter very seriously and are working to ship anonymous delivery ASAP, so you can protect your personal information when placing an order.
For more information, visit our blog: trezor.io/blog/news/recent-c…
We have some difficult news to share. Unfortunately, one of our shipping providers has experienced a data breach that exposed sensitive order data. This affects new customers in the US, UK, Sweden, Colombia, Brazil, Italy, and Portugal who received an order within the 90 days prior to August 8th, 2026.
The data exposed:
- Full names
- Shipping addresses
- Phone numbers
- Email addresses
The incident affects 11,742 customers with full exposure (name, email, phone number, shipping address) and 1,947 customers with partial exposure (name, city, email). The breach is limited due to Trezor’s strict 90-day data storage policy (we were also able to negotiate the same terms with fulfillment partners, who follow the same policy).
All affected customers have been contacted separately by email.
Our systems and devices remain secure, but affected customers could experience an increase in phishing attempts.
NEVER enter your wallet backup on a website or share it with anyone, and only check for updates on official Trezor channels.
We are deeply sorry to the community and those affected.
We are investigating this situation and will post updates on our blog:
trezor.io/blog/news/recent-c…
Bullcrap retweeted
The Bippers managed to antagonize the only exchange that was willing to list their Shitcoin 😂
Bullcrap retweeted
Power is the hardest good for socialists to grasp.
If you turn off the lights, it doesn't mean some child in Africa gets to turn his nightlight on.
All power in the grid has already been generated. If it's not used, it strains the grid. Electricity prices can sometimes even be negative, you get paid to use power. Power is generated from multiple sources, it all goes into the grid. When you have a reliable buyer, it stabilizes the grid. When you don't, the grid can be strained from excess power, leading to someone or something having to curtail power generation. Usually, curtailment happens in coal or nuclear to make way for wind and solar. Curtailing a nuclear power plant is really expensive.
This is why retarded things like "Earth hour," when everyone supposedly saves the planet by sitting in the dark, should be renamed more appropriately to: "Let's fuck with the base load day" to accurately describe the damage it does.
Bullcrap retweeted
1. I'll accept there's a problem the moment a BIPtard can tell me how much more they're paying for the transactions because JPEGs are hogging all the blockspace. Thus far not a single one has answered me on this, so maybe you'll be the first.
1.b I don't believe this will be a problem, because the moment fees are prohibitively expensive, that means institutions are settling with each other and those transactions are what is crowding blockspace. Bitcoin has won at this point. There is no reality where a JPEG is so important to anyone that they'd pay tens of millions of sats, even more, just to get it on-chain. The economic argument simply destroys this claim. The idea that all else will be equal when fees rise is stupid and not backed by evidence.
I expect to be blocked for asking how many sats more you're paying because JPEGs are hogging all the blockspace, every other BIPtard has resorted to doing that because the question is just impossible to answer. I'll add that I'll accept a sat amount as an answer, if you dodge, deflect or pivot to something else, I'll keep repeating the question. For reference, I paid a few hundred sats last time I transacted. How many sats too much is that because of JPEGs?
2. Mining pools are pools. Mining pools contain rational economic actors. If a pool engages in irrational economic behavior via cartelization, rational actors will break ranks.
2b. I'm glad you bring up OFAC because some years ago, Marathon wanted to engage in filtering OFAC-sanctioned addresses from blocks. They managed to do this, and they lost a shit ton of money in the span of weeks because rational actors swooped in and mined those blocks without discriminating. Marathon had to give it up. This completely obliterates your argument that OFAC will be an issue. It's been tried and it failed because miners aren't suicidal.
3. Demurrage doesn't exist. For some reason BIPtards think Peter Todd's tweets control Bitcoin more than Luke controls Blakecoin. If you believe this, why were you ever in Bitcoin? Is Peter the Vitalik of Bitcoin? Yes or no?
4. I addressed the fee question above. The assumption that JPEGs will price out institutions engaging in final settlement to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars is absolutely deranged, and no one can explain the roadmap to get here.
5. My line in the sand is Bitcoin's consensus parameters. That's why I'm not engaging in Lukecoin, which took all of 3 days to unilaterally force a consensus parameter change on its users, and you all think it's great. You can't change consensus parameters because it'd be a different protocol. Demurrage requires a hard fork. The protocol doesn't allow it. It's not a line in the sand because it can't happen.
I'm happy to hear anyone in this thread respond to these questions, I've been posing them for weeks.
Bullcrap retweeted
If you were allowed to keep up with inflation
There would be no point in having inflation