BungeeCEO (@BungeeCEO) header
BungeeCEO (@BungeeCEO) profile picture

Got balls Part-time dictator @BungeeExchange

Joined June 2022
Photo by BungeeCEO (@BungeeCEO)Photo by BungeeCEO (@BungeeCEO)Photo by BungeeCEO (@BungeeCEO)Photo by BungeeCEO (@BungeeCEO)Photo by BungeeCEO (@BungeeCEO)Photo by BungeeCEO (@BungeeCEO)Photo by BungeeCEO (@BungeeCEO)Photo by BungeeCEO (@BungeeCEO)Photo by BungeeCEO (@BungeeCEO)Photo by BungeeCEO (@BungeeCEO)
Buying $LUNA in 2 seconds on the @BungeeExchange ft @virtuals_io, @luna_virtuals Should we make a video on how to buy @aixbt_agent as well?
2
3
1
14
3,557
Its live and its called @BungeeExchange A global liquidity marketplace
As reliable as ever — old faithful. Intents are cool but very much suffer at the bounds for stress and liquidity demands. The best systems will likely utilize both approaches. @StargateFinance very well positioned to do this or work with others to do it
2
357
Here is a mental model for everyone when thinking about intents vs bridges vs marketplaces if you think about them like swapping protocols then intents are like RFQs bridges are like AMMs
1
2
196
RFQs will have better efficiency(price, latency) but will not be always available for eg: in times of high demand you can count on market-makers not being available AMMs have the opposite, while reliability is high efficiency will be low So what is the solution?
1
1
67
You stack both RFQ and AMM on top of each other and you get the ideal solution you guessed it BUNGEE MARKETPLACE -- serving you best of all worlds at all times
1
54
Meeting and hanging out with people you are on a mission with for some off-time has got to be best ways to recharge and reenergise lil too many cocktails tho 😂
2
1
27
1,301
Wow @VitalikButerin is in founder mode, he just asked the organisers to lock the door till the founders agree to common standards L2 founders arent getting out till they agree
Ethereum Interop Forum All L2s present on the stage here to talk about how do they interop aka talk to each other better Mic stops working, L2s cant talk to each other apparently
15
38
4
389
58,361
WTF is chain abstraction it's simple. never bridge again, never manage multiple chain-specific balances or wallets. just use apps by using @SocketProtocol
got it. but who's actually building the chain abstraction vision? ultimately, most projects in the vertical fall into: the application layer (for devs) the account layer (for users) or the blockchain layer (for chains) explained in 1 minute
2
322
You ! Yes you! Where you looking at ??? You ! Hello !?!? You staring at the screen! You will get to experience the best chain abstracted experience if you head to @BungeeExchange
finally everyone can experience the best chain abstraction ever @BungeeExchange
1
2
322
No chain! No pain! Just swap! Smooth af 🤌 Fast af 🤌 Get in 👇👇
Holding Bungee Balls? You’re in! Exclusively access Bungee Protocol at new.bungee.exchange 🟠 Note: App in beta — see disclaimer below.
2
5
249
Can’t agree more. People are slowly understanding where we are heading next. Checked out MagicSpend++ by @SocketProtocol, if you haven't already. The future will be chain abstracted.
The real chain-abstracted swaps should include automatic transfers to the origin chain if there aren’t enough funds to complete the desired transaction. This way, the user can execute any transaction on any chain by holding assets in just one chain.
1
2
242
Chain abstraction is the end game.
This quoted post is unavailable.
1
125
Hot take: Supply follows demand. Supply will soon follow @BungeeExchange
5
221
Man got dehydrated shipping @BungeeExchange . Go check it out guys. The more you use it, the more sleepless this guy gets. 😝
Man, 1 day of sleep screw up can mess your day so bad. Prioritise your sleep frens and don't forget to be hydrated
1
1
8
359
Holding Bungee Balls? You’re in! Exclusively access Bungee Protocol at new.bungee.exchange 🟠 Note: App in beta — see disclaimer below.
52
99
30
493
89,582
thinking of handing over this account to the goated @truth_terminal
4
227
BUNGEE mentioned!
how are intents and chain-abstraction related? first, intents, lets consider a scenario where you are trying to reach NYC from LA - intents: you get into robo-taxi, enter destination as NYC and go to sleep - userOp: you get into robo-taxi, enter destination, select route and then go to sleep - transaction: you get into a car, enter destination, select route and drive yourself there intents are simply the most flexible access-delegation mechanism when it comes to chain-abstraction the goal is to remove the need for users to transact onchain and to rather have other parties handle that complexity both userOps and intents can enable chain-abstraction as they leave the "how" open while enabling users to either authorise "end-state" or "exact-instructions" depending on the usecase so you as a user can now be "chain-abstracted" when you authorise third-parties to perform actions onchain on your behalf 2 quick examples of intents and userOps being used to enable chain-abstraction are: - @BungeeExchange enabling access to assets anywhere via intents and liquidity-market - Magic-Accounts by @zerodev that enable chain-abstraction via userOps A generalised intents engine is super powerful and will be make it super easy for developers to built intentful applications, however when it comes to chain-abstraction, intents are a subset or one of the ways to achieve chain-abstraction
3
291
we like BALLS DEEP LIQUIDITY
7
746