Replying to @VanEmmerickKris
They’re pushing for electric cars but apparently we’re heading into rolling blackouts 🤷♂️ make it make sense
Byronic Mac 😎 retweeted
Climate policies have consequences
EU pays 1.9x US prices and 3x China and India
UK has the costliest electricity in the world
iea.org/data-and-statistics/…
The cheap green lie
You are told that solar and wind are cheap
But you need near-100% backup when no sun or wind, paying for two systems
Data for 2025 shows that
cramming in more solar and wind makes electricity overall more and more costly
Sources:
Electricity prices, households and industry, 2025
iea.org/data-and-statistics/…
Solar and wind generation, electricity use and consumption weights
iea.org/data-and-statistics/…
Solar and wind for countries without IEA 2025 data
ember-energy.org/data
Electricity trade partners, plus industry prices for Norway, Albania, Iceland and Kosovo
ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/en…
US industry price
eia.gov/electricity/annual
Australia, IEA 2021 prices updated with official price indices
abs.gov.au/statistics/econom…
South Africa industry price
eskom.co.za/wp-content/uploa…
Taiwan industry tariff
taipower.com.tw
Egypt industry tariff
egyptera.org/en/TarrifAug202…
Tunisia tariffs (archived copy, the STEG site is unreachable)
web.archive.org/web/20250614…
Azerbaijan industry tariff
regulator.gov.az/en/istehlak…
2025 tariff changes applied to IEA 2024 prices
Pakistan: nepra.org.pk
Thailand: erc.or.th
Ghana: purc.com.gh
Paraguay: ande.gov.py
Kazakhstan: stat.gov.kz/en/industries/ec…
GlobalPetrolPrices 2025 averages for 18 countries, read from archived 2025 pages
globalpetrolprices.com/elect…
web.archive.org
Sri Lanka 2025 tariff changes
pucsl.gov.lk/end-user-tariff…
Indonesia solar and wind estimated from official 2025 capacity
esdm.go.id/id/media-center/a…
Statista 2025 averages for China, Mexico, Brazil, Russia, Singapore, Peru, Argentina and South Africa (data from GlobalPetrolPrices)
statista.com/statistics/1369… (business prices worldwide)
statista.com/statistics/1461… (household prices worldwide)
statista.com/statistics/1173… (Latin America business)
statista.com/statistics/1123… (Latin America households)
statista.com/statistics/1373… (China business)
statista.com/statistics/1372… (Mexico business)
statista.com/statistics/1372… (Mexico households)
statista.com/statistics/1617… (South Africa households)
Byronic Mac 😎 retweeted
Wiele razy pisałem, że wraz z Unią zmierzamy w stronę faszyzmu - ale nigdy nie myślałem, że dożyję czegoś takiego!
Pod obrady Sejmu trafiła Ustawa 3003 "O wrogach ludu" - powielająca ustawy stalinowskie i przebijająca ustawy hitlerowskie. Mówi ona, że jeśli ktoś - osoba fizyczna lub prawna - powie coś, co jest sprzeczne z polityką państwa (w sprawie Ukrainy, CoViDu, walki z klimatem, LGBTQZ - w każdej!) decyzją ministra (!!) może trafić ona (bez swojej wiedzy!!) na listę Wrogów Ludu. Może zostać ukarana do 10 lat więzienia i grzywną do 20 mln zł. I każdy, kto poprze takiego Wroga Ludu - np. wpłacając coś na jego konto (nie wiedząc, że to jest Wróg Ludu!) podobnie - w przypadku firm do 200 milionów!
Przerażające jest to, że zgłosił to rząd, na czele którego stoi były liberał, JE Donald Tusk, Ale jeszcze bardziej przerażające, że odbywa się to w ciszy. Nawet ja o tym do niedawna nie wiedziałem. Odbyły się już dwa posiedzenia komisji (poparły ten projekt ogromną wikszością!), podkomisji - a Sejm przesłał to ponownie do komisji. Jedynie KORONA odważyła się sprzeciwić. KONFEDERFACJA ani razu nie zabrała w tej sprawie głosu, a PiS się kryguje. Żaden dziennikarz nie odważył się podnieść larum, że III Rzeczpospolita staje się III Rzeszą, a nawet gorzej!
Rząd twierdzi, że jest to wypełnienie norm unijnych (nieprawda, znacznie je przekracza!). Twierdzi też, że jest to tylko przedłużenie ustawy PiSu z 2022 - i ma trochę racji. Cała Banda Czworga, jak to im śp.gen.Czesław Kiszczak nakazał - zgodnie to popiera.
Proszę alarmować gdzie się da - nie tylko w kraju, ale i za granicą. To jest coś niewiarygodnego - ale to JEST!
5 listopada protestujemy w Warszawie - ale tu potrzeba środków bardziej skutecznych. Myślmy nad nimi - i działajmy! Bo niedługo przyjdą po nas.
sejm.gov.pl/Sejm10.nsf/Przeb…
Byronic Mac 😎 retweeted
🚨 I posted this a year ago. Today it’s now law… you are no longer innocent until proven guilty. In fact you might not even know you’ve been found guilty at all!
🚨 RESPECT ORDERS - You don’t need to break the law to be criminalised in Britain. You just need to annoy the wrong person.
The government is pushing through something called a Respect Order, part of the new Crime and Policing Bill now moving through Parliament.
Respect Orders are civil, not criminal, so they don’t require a jury or criminal standard of proof. Just someone saying you’re causing a nuisance, even online!
If someone complains, that you're too loud, too disruptive, too opinionated, you can be banned from:
▪️Posting on social media
▪️Attending a protest
▪️Speaking in a public place
▪️Even entering certain areas
All without ever being charged with a crime. And if you break the order?
well … that’s a crime. You could be fined, arrested, or jailed for up to two years.
It’s pre-crime policing and It’s about control, not safety. It’s a ban on dissent.
Byronic Mac 😎 retweeted
This is what worries me. About France and about the UK...
"No one can tell when, exactly, a crisis might arrive: it depends on the country and its politics. Yet once investors conclude that a country cannot conceivably afford to pay the debt, interest rates will surely start to jump, the mechanism through which practically every financial crisis plays out. We are in the phase where everybody still pretends that the situation is under control, and that all that needs to happen is for governments to save a bit of money here and there. In practice, though, ministers of all stripes find this hard"
And
"Looking at the presidential candidates in France today ahead of the election next April, I struggle to see how the country will end up with a government that succeeds in doing all of the following: bringing the budget deficit under control; avoiding social unrest; complying with European rules; and staying in the eurozone. Something has to give here."
And
"Yet what many Europeans, including politicians, don’t understand is the relationship between debt and membership of the eurozone. Put simply: you can’t default on your debt and expect to keep the euro. Debt serves as collateral for the money the banking system gets from the ECB. If a country defaults on its debt, the banking system inevitably freezes up....
... France defaulting on its debt would likely lead to a French exit from the euro. Should we ever get to this point, the ensuing financial crisis would dwarf everything we have ever experienced. Financial institutions would fail all over the world. For its part, the eurozone might not survive, as other countries default on their debts and crash out in turn. Ironically, one of the European countries most affected in this scenario would be the UK. Despite not being a member of the EU, let alone the eurozone, Britain’s capital market would be deeply vulnerable to chaos across the Channel."
Does anyone believe @UKLabour has the economic nous to navigate this when our own finances are so shaky?
unherd.com/2026/10/how-the-n…
Byronic Mac 😎 retweeted
England in ten years
再强调一遍,浏览外网或翻墙被派出所传唤,根本不用慌。
首先是网警从流量监控系统中标记了你,然后会通知你当地的派出所片儿警将你传唤问话。
你的不当言论,会被打印出来,放在你面前。
你的手机,会要求解锁,他们会检查你在群里,聊天软件里还说了什么。
民警是很忙,但如果接到系统派发的工单,再忙也要处理,不然就一直挂在系统里,影响KPI了。
处理这种事,民警作为体制内打工人,他的自由裁量权很大的。你其实是增加他们工作量的一个小麻烦。只要好好配合,他们没必要跟你计较太多。
所以只要保证流程合规,上交资料完整,应付检查就行了。但你如果要装逼,摆出不合作的姿态,那不好意思,想整你的途径和方法太多了,哈哈。
去了之后,态度好一点,姿态低一点,开口说:“领导,不好意思,给你添麻烦了。”
然后最重要的是问话环节,他问你答。你不要没事找事,自己多说乱说。不知道、不了解、没做过的,直接就说不知道,别的一概不说。但你确实做过的,而且白纸黑字的放在你面前,那就不要抵赖。
不要说任何对抗性的言论。比如什么什么做的不对,所以我要批判。
如果你是因为不当发言被传唤,就说:“我理解错了意思,以为他在说什么,所以我才说了什么,表达有偏差。其实我不是这个意思。”
如果你是因为浏览了网站被传唤,就说我是不小心点到的,我一点开它就推送了,我也不知道为什么。
只要你态度好,把事情往小了说,一般也就是记录一下。没人愿意增加自己的工作量,对不对?
笔录确认没问题,签字盖章,这事儿就翻篇儿了。
千万不要装逼硬刚。
还有,虽然翻墙了,但什么该说、什么不该说,作为一个成年人,生在红旗下,长在春风里,接受了国家这么多年的教育,自己心里应该有点逼数。
毕竟你爸不是李刚,就算是,也不行。
Byronic Mac 😎 retweeted
"Anybody reporting Voter Fraud in the past Elections, or the upcoming 2026 Midterm Election, will be paid $1,000,000 upon the arrest and conviction of those that created the Fraud!" - President Donald J. Trump 🇺🇸
Byronic Mac 😎 retweeted
We now see the full extent of preplanning and empire-building that went into the United Nations' global warming campaign.
It was all behind the scenes. Today, the UN has a workforce of roughly 190,000 and an annual budget of $3.45 billion. It has become a vast self-managing, self perpetuating bureaucracy - arguably the largest non-governmental network in the world. The UN had been laying the groundwork for an environmental crisis for decades before it was finally announced in 1988.
The UN took control of the World Meteorological Organization in 1951, transforming it into a specialised UN agency. The WMO operates with an annual budget of approximately $138.7 million and has a staff of 350 to 400.
The WMO bridges the gap between raw meteorological data, international political agendas and global news media - linking thousands of land stations, ocean buoys, aircraft and satellites. While its stated role is to share critical weather and water data, this massive infrastructure has been effectively co-opted into a public relations framework.
Consequently, the world has been bombarded with weather hysteria for almost 40 years. Mainstream news outlets routinely prioritise speculative, worst-case climate models over empirical observations - like 'rain bombs' - maintaining a permanent state of crisis designed to shape public compliance.
The information gathering agency, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, runs the scientific arm. It operates with a core secretariat of just 15 staff members and an annual budget of roughly $12.5 million. The IPCC was established 38 years ago, ostensibly as a neutral body to gather objective scientific information on climate.
In reality, the IPCC became the driving force behind the greatest environmental and social upheaval in modern history. Highly politicised from its inception, it was founded entirely by UN agencies - the WMO and the UN Environment Programme. This gave the UN absolute control over the global climate agenda and funded what has become the largest propaganda campaign in history.
The UN has also run annual fund raising COP summits around the world for 30 years. They have become junkets for the rich and privileged.
The IPCC did not recruit independent scientific staff; instead, its administrative apparatus actively sponsors and selects studies that supported the carbon dioxide hypothesis. Research raising questions or doubts are minimised or discarded. Critics find their studies starved of funding and publishers, while some even faced threats to their academic tenures.
Local weather outlets and national agencies now operate inside an ecosystem heavily influenced by these overarching, high-alarm targets, broadcasting continuous warnings of 'global boiling', catastrophic sea-level rise, and 'Code Red for Humanity' - with UN leadership acting as the chief amplifier. This environment birthed foundational, highly charged studies designed to lock in future warming projections.
For decades, the UN promoted only extreme scenarios. A prime example is the IPCC's reliance on high-end warming trajectories - such as projections warning of up to a 5.5-degree temperature rise - predictions so extreme that even mainstream scientists have increasingly conceded they are implausible.
Armed with a crisis of its own making, the UN called for the rapid dismantling of hydrocarbon fuels - coal, oil, and natural gas - the very energy sources that lifted humanity out of stagnation and powered the Industrial Revolution. Almost every aspect of modern civilisation, from transport networks to industrial manufacturing, relies entirely on these dense, inexpensive and reliable energy sources.
Climate management bears no relation to the UN’s foundational charter of resolving international conflict; it's a textbook case of bureaucratic mission creep.
The sheer complexity of this UN machinery, combined with an aura of technical authority, is precisely what insulates it from public scrutiny.
Byronic Mac 😎 retweeted
Bukele l’a dit clairement :
« Si vous n’impeachez pas les juges corrompus, vous NE POUVEZ PAS réformer le pays. Ils formeront un cartel (une dictature judiciaire) et bloqueront toutes les réformes. »
Le Brésil vient de le montrer en direct.
La France le pratique depuis des décennies, plus discrètement.
Le suffrage universel n’a de sens que si le dernier mot appartient aux élus, pas à un réseau de magistrats irrévocables qui interprètent les règles selon leurs intérêts.
Sans destitution réelle des juges politiques, les élections restent un théâtre.
Le cartel reste en place.
A bon entendeur.
Au Brésil, on vient d’avoir le plus bel exemple d’État profond en action. Et la France a exactement le même.
Dimanche, les bureaux de vote devaient fermer à 17 h. Le décompte avait déjà commencé. La campagne de Lula saisit alors le STF pour réclamer une prolongation nationale. Le juge qui tranche, Cristiano Zanin, n’est pas un magistrat neutre tombé du ciel : c’est l’ancien avocat personnel de Lula, nommé au Supremo Tribunal Federal en 2023… par Lula lui-même. Il ordonne deux heures supplémentaires sur tout le pays.
Le TSE doit interrompre le décompte.
Confusion dans les bureaux, certains déjà fermés, d’autres rouverts dans le flou. Quatre ans plus tôt, en 2022, Alexandre de Moraes (alors à la tête du TSE) avait refusé une demande similaire du PT malgré des blocages routiers. Les règles se plient selon le camp qui demande.
Ce n’est pas un incident. C’est le fonctionnement normal d’un appareil judiciaire et institutionnel qui a cessé d’être un arbitre pour devenir un acteur politique permanent. L’État profond, c’est précisément ça : un réseau de hauts magistrats, de conseillers, de hauts fonctionnaires et de relais médiatiques qui survivent aux élections, qui interprètent les règles, qui fixent les limites du possible, et qui savent à quel moment il faut « adapter » le cadre pour protéger « un certain ordre ». Les citoyens votent, les institutions décident ce que le vote a vraiment le droit de changer.
La France connaît exactement la même mécanique depuis des décennies. Le Conseil constitutionnel, la Cour de cassation, le Conseil d’État, les hautes juridictions administratives et une partie du parquet n’ont pas seulement interprété le droit : ils ont progressivement délimité le périmètre de ce qui est politiquement acceptable.
Des réformes votées par des majorités élues ont été neutralisées, retardées ou vidées de leur substance par des interprétations extensives, des questions prioritaires de constitutionnalité opportunément soulevées, ou des décisions de censure présentées comme purement techniques.
Pendant ce temps, « le personnel politique change », mais les mêmes milieux (énarques, magistrats issus des mêmes promotions, hauts fonctionnaires recyclés dans les conseils et les médias) continuent de définir les « principes républicains » que nul élu ne peut vraiment contester sans être qualifié de danger.
Dans les deux pays, on célèbre le suffrage universel tout en confiant le dernier mot à des gens qui ne sont ni élus ni révocables par les électeurs.
On parle de « démocratie » alors que le vrai pouvoir de blocage, d’interprétation et d’ajustement des règles se situe en dehors du cycle électoral.
Le Brésil vient simplement de le montrer de façon plus crue, avec un juge-ex-avocat du candidat qui prolonge le scrutin en pleine journée.
La France le fait depuis plus longtemps, de façon plus feutrée, et avec les mêmes justifications : défense de l’État de droit, protection des institutions, sauvegarde des acquis. Le résultat est identique : les électeurs découvrent trop tard que leur vote ne pèse que dans les limites que l’appareil a déjà fixées.
Tant qu’on ne nommera pas clairement cet État profond au Brésil comme en France on continuera à s’étonner que les résultats électoraux produisent si peu de changements réels.
Byronic Mac 😎 retweeted
Most Western democracies have been hacked. Not with code. With institutional architecture. Let me show you how it works, using the most advanced example: the European Union.
First, how it works. Once every five years, you vote for a European Parliament that cannot even initiate legislation. The body that proposes laws is the Commission: 27 commissioners nobody elected, appointed after backroom bargaining between heads of state. Bills are then negotiated between the Commission, Parliament and Council in "trilogues", closed-door meetings where the real decisions get made. A law that will apply to 450 million people goes through corridors that 99.9% of them will never see.
Now look at who's in those corridors. Brussels has become the lobbying capital of the world: nearly 18,000 organizations on the transparency register, tens of thousands of lobbyists, more than 50 for every single MEP. And that's just the declared part. Add the revolving door: a former MEP only has to wait six months before becoming a lobbyist to the EU himself.
The real problem is distance. A national MP who votes for a law that ruins the farmers in his district runs into them at the market on Saturday. In Brussels, the decision-maker never meets the people who live with his decisions. But he meets lobbyists every day: at lunch, at cocktails, at conferences. So the system doesn't optimize for the wellbeing of the people. It optimizes for the interests of whoever is in the room. You don't even need corruption for that, incentives are enough. Although sometimes, as Qatargate showed, there's corruption too.
The result: the system has a structural incentive to accept things the people would never vote for.
Take Mercosur. Twenty-five years of negotiations. France votes against it in the Council in January 2026 and gets outvoted. To keep national parliaments from blocking it, the Commission splits the deal into two texts, including a trade agreement that only needs a vote in Brussels. The European Parliament itself writes, in black and white, that this split circumvents the right of national parliaments, and refers the deal to the EU Court of Justice. The Commission's response: it has been applying the agreement provisionally since May 1, 2026, without waiting for the Court's opinion. Farmers were protesting outside Parliament. They lost anyway.
And remember the one time the people were actually asked about Europe directly: in 2005, France and the Netherlands rejected the European Constitution. The text came back two years later as the Lisbon Treaty, ratified by parliaments. No more referendums.
But the worst of it is immigration. In 2015, relocation quotas were imposed by qualified majority on countries that had voted against them. Since June 12, 2026, the Pact on Migration and Asylum applies across the entire Union, with its "mandatory solidarity" mechanism: you take people in, or you pay. Not a single European people has ever been consulted directly on this, even though it's the issue that is transforming our societies most profoundly.
And this is where we have to talk about the most sophisticated piece of the machine: George Soros.
Soros understood before anyone else that you don't need to win elections if you shape the ecosystem around the people who make decisions. His network, the Open Society Foundations, describes itself as the largest private funder of advocacy groups in the world. In Brussels, it runs its own lobbying arm aimed at EU institutions, the Open Society European Policy Institute.
Here's what we know from internal documents leaked in 2016: a document titled "Reliable allies in the European Parliament" listed more than 200 MEPs. Strategy papers described building "inside-track groups" to caucus "internal allies" who could advance their goals in their daily work. Training sessions were organized for MEPs on how to counter so-called populist parties.
The mechanism is brutally elegant. Think tanks produce the "expertise". NGOs produce the "demand from civil society". Legal NGOs litigate in the courts. Funded media outlets produce the narrative. The Brussels decision-maker, cut off from the population, hears the same message from every direction and ends up believing that this is what people want.
And the craziest part: the institutions fund the loop themselves. Between 2021 and 2023, the EU paid around €7.4 billion to NGOs, and the European Court of Auditors found the use of that money insufficiently transparent. It even came out that the Commission had funded NGOs to lobby MEPs in favor of its own Green Deal legislation. The institution pays "civil society" to ask it to do what it already wanted to do.
All of this is legal. That's exactly what makes it a hack and not a crime. The system works exactly as designed, except nobody designed it for the people anymore.
The patch is simple to state and hard to impose: bring decisions back closer to the people who bear them, hold referendums on issues that change a civilization, create a mandatory register for every influence actor, NGOs included, with their funding sources, and shut the revolving door. Until that happens, European democracy will remain what it has become: a user interface sitting on top of a system that runs for someone else.
🤖 Made with AI
Byronic Mac 😎 retweeted
Tell him his ethnic group doesn’t exist and then reject his job application for being part of that ethnic group.
Byronic Mac 😎 retweeted
Replying to @Benleo
Total bollocks. I only pay for Sky Sports on the off chance I get a thorough geopolitical briefing from Lewis Hamilton and a look at his post race keks.
Byronic Mac 😎 retweeted
🚨An 11-bedroom HMO in London, owned by Kamber Ramadani, just received boxes of machetes and zombie knives.
Police bodycam shows officers pulling them out on the doorstep.
The same name was jailed in 2020 for trying to smuggle illegal knives and a starter pistol into the UK to sell from his Old Kent Road shop.
Serious questions: Who is living in this HMO? How do bulk banned weapons reach multi-occupancy properties with this landlord’s history? Why does this keep happening under current housing and enforcement policies?
Every MP should be asked about this.
It does not look like coincidence.
Byronic Mac 😎 retweeted
Amazing that in the course of a couple of centuries Europe went from conquering the globe to being leveled by pencil-necked Marxists who have never even thrown a punch, let alone fired a gun
Byronic Mac 😎 retweeted
Finally some evidence!
Turns out Ukraine was in fact violating the Starlink TOS by strapping Starlink terminal into drones they were using to attack Russia.
SpaceX figured out that the terminals were travelling fast by gaging how often they switch satellite connection.
They updated their terminals and that’s what caused the “slowdown”.




































