我记得小布什说过，他很有可能是最后一个共和党总统。（如果我记错了，那就是左媒造谣。）
要不是有川这个独角兽进来狠狠地搅了几下，小布什说不定真一语成谶。
小布什发表声明，祝贺特朗普赢得大选：乔治·W·布什祝贺唐纳德·特朗普当选美国第47任总统。这一点，小布什绝对比切尼一家聪明，大选前，切尼逼迫小布什表态支持哈里斯，但布什家族，保持了沉默，直到今天，大选结果明朗后，小布什率先向特朗普祝贺，从而完成了政治的重新站队。相反，切尼家族，由于背叛了共和党，同时又不可能被民主党接纳，就真正成了被美国两党抛弃的丧家之犬。
乔治·W·布什:
“我祝贺特朗普总统当选为美国第47任总统，也祝贺当选副总统JD Vance及其家人。”
他感谢拜登和卡玛拉的服务，并强调选举投票率反映了“我们共和国的健康状况”。
尽管呼吁支持，布什对 2024 年的竞选保持沉默，而他的女儿则积极支持卡玛拉。
Archer retweeted
This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate.
There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span.
This is not “bias."
It’s much worse.
This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of “fact checkers" the inference is that the absence of a “fact check” confers validity to the non-fact-checked information.
When one side is repeatedly “fact checked,” while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is.
The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed.
In this clip:
1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamala’s behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesn’t acknowledging the validity of Trump’s statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her “answer" he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange.
2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check.
3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trump’s “peacefully and patriotically” comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check.
4) Kamala says that “some" police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check.
5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville “Fine People” hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check.
6) Kamala recites the “stand back and stand by” hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a “militia” to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check.
7) Kamala recites the “bloodbath" hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check.
To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators:
"They did exactly what their bosses wanted."
China reggaeton是我最喜欢听的歌之一，还推荐给不少西人朋友。
Mourning for 1997 & The Golden Age of HK movies'...
之前和 #黃秋生AnthonyPerry 合唱的《China Reggaeton》快要2,600萬播放量了。所以特別邀請他再來合作一次一首“認真”的作品，來致敬我們逝去的古惑青春，致敬香港電影的輝煌時代，以及為香港97默哀...
