
@CFCPysi
Account based in
About this account
- Account based in
- Europe
- Connected via
- Europe App Store
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Covering Everything Chelsea Football Club. Fast and Reliable News Updates, Match Coverage, Stats and More! DM for Promo / Enquiries. Fan Account.
Joined December 2015
- Tweets91.2K
- Following6.2K
- Followers716K
- Likes554K
He’s gone tonight and Chelsea are going to have to face a new manager where United will get a bounce. That performance against Spurs from us was a disgrace, zero energy or fight, no ideas in possession, we need to turn a page next week and be ready for two big games..
🤝 Paid partnership
Pys retweeted
I Made $4,000 Betting On Sports Yesterday. Here's Exactly How.
35% ROI on the day.
I started with $280 a few years ago.
Will you make $4,000 tomorrow after reading this? No.
But if you understand what's below, you'll understand why it's possible, and why most bettors never get close.
Here's the whole thing.
**What a "good day" actually is**
$4,000 at 35% ROI means I risked about $11,400 across a lot of bets.
That's the part nobody posts.
It wasn't one big parlay. It was a lot of small edges stacked together.
Some of those bets lost. They're supposed to.
**EV+ in plain English**
EV means expected value. Positive EV means expected profit.
Every bet has a fair price, the true chance it hits.
If the fair price is +100 (50/50) and a book gives you +110, you're getting paid more than the bet is worth.
Do that once and it's a coin flip.
Do it 1,000 times and it's a business.
That's it. That's the whole game. Price, not picks.
**How I find those prices every day (@OddsJam)**
I use @OddsJam every single day. Here's how:
1. Positive EV tool
It compares every book to the sharpest lines in the market and shows me where a book is slow. If the sharp books say a player is 55% to go over and a book is pricing it like 50%, that's the bet.
2. The odds screen
Every book side by side. Same bet, different prices. I never take a worse number when a better one is one tap away.
3. Sharp money and whales
OddsJam's Prediction Traders tool lets me watch the sharpest traders on Polymarket and Kalshi in real time. The guys with real records and real volume. When one of them bets way bigger than normal, that's a signal.
I don't blindly copy them. I check 3 things first:
→ Is this actually his sport?
→ How big is the bet compared to his normal size?
→ Has the price already moved too much?
If it passes, I bet it. Usually at a better price than he got.
4. Catching steam
When sharp money hits a market, the price moves fast. Prediction markets are SOMETIMES slower (for a few seconds) to adjust than the sharper books. If I catch the move early, I'm getting yesterday's price on today's information.
**The limits problem**
Win long enough on regular sportsbooks and they limit you. I'm limited on basically every book in Florida.
That's why prediction markets matter. You're betting against other people, not the house. Nobody cuts you off for being good.
**The part that makes or breaks you: emotion**
Here's what nobody tells you.
You can be a winning bettor and still have losing weeks. Sometimes a few in a row. Sometimes your bankroll drops a lot.
Most people see that and quit, or chase it with a bigger bet.
Both kill you.
If the bets are +EV and your sizing stays the same, the math catches up. It's not a feeling. It's math.
**How I'd start from $280 today**
1. Pick a bankroll you can afford to lose. Separate from bills.
2. 1 unit = 1% of it. Every bet. No exceptions.
3. Only bet when the price beats the fair line.
4. 10+ bets a day, every day. Volume is what makes the edge show up.
5. Track everything on @pikkitsports for FREE.
6. Don't judge anything before a few hundred bets.
None of this is exciting. That's why it works.
**Why most of you won't do this**
Because it's boring.
Because a losing week feels like proof it doesn't work.
Because a 10-leg parlay feels better than a 4% edge.
The people who stick with it don't have better picks. They have rules.
WANT HELP BUILDING YOUR OWN SYSTEM?
Reading this gives you the framework. Applying it to your own bankroll, available sportsbooks and daily schedule is the next step.
That's what I help bettors do through IconBets coaching.
We work on understanding prices, finding and evaluating opportunities, managing your bankroll, tracking your bets, and building a routine you can actually follow.
The goal is for you to understand why you're placing a bet and how to evaluate your decisions beyond one winning or losing night.
If you're serious about learning this approach, book a free call with me below.
We'll talk about where you're at, what you're struggling with, and whether the paid coaching program is a good fit for you.
Book your free call here:
calendly.com/iconbets/coachi…
If you just want tonight's lock, this isn't for you.
If you want help understanding and applying the process behind your bets, let's talk.
Pys retweeted
This is insane😭
I make $528 an hour arbitrage betting.
The average American makes about $29 an hour.
I am clearing more than 18 times that during the time it takes most people to eat lunch.
Each arbitrage bet takes about a minute to place and pays out $8 to $10 on average. At $9 per bet, hitting $350 a day means placing around 39 bets. 39 bets. 39 minutes of work. $350 in profit.
Sportsbooks set their lines independently. When they disagree enough, both sides of the same bet become profitable at the same time. That window does not last long. @OddsJam finds it in real time.
This is not gambling. I am not predicting games. I am not tailing picks. I am placing bets on both sides of the same market across two books simultaneously and locking in a guaranteed profit before the game even starts. The result does not matter. Here is exactly what that looks like.
This month I averaged $350 in profit per day across 23 days. Every single day is green.
That is what my sports betting side hustle pays me when I break down the math. I work a full-time IT job. I am 28 years old. And @OddsJam has become the most profitable thing I do with my time. Here is exactly how I make this work. 🧵👇
Alonso's tactical set-up was not befitting of a club that say they want to be competing with the biggest and best soon enough. They showed no authority, no ingenuity, no sense that they were prepared to make the most of what little possession they had as the ball was hoofed in hope. (@kierangill_DM) dailymail.com/sport/football…
De Zerbi’s on-ball coaching today was what I wanted to see from Alonso, I don’t think I’ve seen Alonso coach a full game of anything akin to what we saw under Maresca. Maybe I got misled down a wrong path, but I really thought Xabi’s principles were different to what we’re seeing this season. I don’t to watch a Chelsea team with 35-50% possession 🤦
Pys retweeted
Why, just why did Alonso think conceding possession and countering was a good plan? A team that has had so many fast starts lacked so much energy and impetus today, and allowed De Zerbi’s Spurs to control the game through possession. So disappointing, the team was played off the park for large portions of the match.
I don’t understand constantly kicking it long either, without a striker - that was food and drink for Van Hecke.
Zero idea to build up and play out the back, no Lavia or even Barco subbed on to come deep and get on the ball and start playing.
Worst performance against Tottenham in years.
Pys retweeted
Absolutely disgraceful performance. Out coached, out fought, out played and embarrassed.
I’ve been watching Chelsea for 30 years and I have never seen us play like this vs Spurs
Xabi got it completely wrong. Sitting back and conceding possession at Stamford Bridge is not acceptable. Especially against Tottenham. You have to use the energy of the crowd. We were way too PASSIVE. To score so many goals and then not score one against them is abysmal. De Zerbi took him to the cleaners tactically. I’ve seen Conte, who won a PREMIER LEAGUE for us, lose the fans because of losing to Spurs. Alonso has a lot of work to do now to win the match going fans back.















