Catholic Revert Recovering Hardcore Democrat that #WalkedAway. Fierce Mama Bear. Obsessed with natural healing. 🇺🇸 Italian Dual Citizen 🇮🇹
Joined January 2017
- Tweets8.5K
- Following1.4K
- Followers190
- Likes12.7K
Christina Giunta retweeted
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Christina Giunta retweeted
This is the absolute definition of delusional. @realDonaldTrump - for the sake of our nation please wake up. Tonight was your fault.
- You let Susie Wiles run your administration into the dirt.
- You ignored the failed DOJ.
- You started wars. You let gas prices explode.
- You supported mRNA and glyphosate.
- You let Dan Bongina @dbongino and the warlord dildo crew create a war amongst your base.
- You protected the child rapists in the Epstein files
- You attacked your best supporters in Congress and endorsed RINOs.
You are at fault.
Please - for the sake of it nation - wake up.
Christina Giunta retweeted
Wisconsin voters have spoken, and Democrats will hold a governing trifecta for the first time in nearly two decades. Governor-elect David Crowley, Assembly Minority Leader Greta Neubauer, and Senate Minority Leader Dianne Hesselbein will set the agenda in Madison.
I congratulate them on their victory.
For years, Wisconsin has thrived under an approach that made important investments while also reducing the tax burden. That balance delivered economic growth, fiscal responsibility, and opportunity for families and job creators. Republicans remain committed to those same principles: lower costs, a lighter tax burden, and an economy that expands opportunity rather than government.
Democrats spent the campaign promising lower costs and relief for families while offering few specifics. Their records tell a clearer story. Under Crowley, Milwaukee County nearly doubled its sales tax and raised property-tax levies in five of his six years. He has argued higher taxes are not a burden. Hold on to your wallets. With full control of state government, that approach is now on track to become statewide policy.
The new Democratic leadership also lacks any real private-sector experience. Crowley built his career in campaign organizing and political staff work. Neubauer and Hesselbein have the same resume. They know politics. Being good at politics will mean paying back their powerful political allies.
Republicans know what it takes to support a family or grow a small business, and we will keep that perspective front and center.
Over the next two years, I know Republicans will stand firmly with the taxpayers and job creators who built Wisconsin’s success. Conservatives will offer constructive alternatives, demand accountability, and make sure voters can see the difference between growing government and growing opportunity.
Many newly elected Democrats presented themselves as moderates; their leadership team has a different agenda.
Wisconsin’s strengths—our workforce, our communities, and our tradition of common-sense governance—are durable. Republicans will work every day to protect those strengths, highlight what is working, and prepare for the moment when voters again choose balance and results over one-party control.
The next two years will test our resolve. They will also clarify the choice ahead. We are ready for both.
Christina Giunta retweeted
Bret Weinstein just dropped a bombshell announcement.
He’s launching a new America First party.
This changes everything about the 2028 election.
“We will not be voting our way out of our crisis through the uniparty.”
“The idea is to take over the Libertarian Party.”
“And to rebrand it the American Liberty Party.”
“I’m partnering with the Mises Caucus.”
“The hard-headed folks who have libertarian values, but are also frustrated by the way the party functions.”
“Some of us thought that we might drain the swamp by voting for a renegade.”
“That does not seem to have worked.”
“Overwhelmingly, the Trump administration has fallen short on many of its promises.”
“I think we would be at war in Iran no matter what.”
“This war was going to happen because the powers involved in the uniparty wanted this war to happen.”
“Our system is built to frustrate the production of a viable third party.”
“The Libertarian Party, for all of its defects, has managed to gain ballot access in all 50 states.”
“That said, the Libertarian Party has historically had difficulty finding a candidate worth voting for.”
“The idea is a friendly takeover of the Libertarian Party.”
“The slogan [is] the new home for the America First movement.”
“What we mean here is America First in the most obvious sense of the term.”
“American policy should always be in the interests of the American people.”
@BretWeinstein @LPMisesCaucus @ALPNational
Christina Giunta retweeted
If you live in any of these #Wisconsin Assembly districts, please get out and vote. Republicans likely need to win 5 of these seats to keep control of the Assembly tomorrow. I don’t care if you’re angry at Trump or the man on the moon. Get out and vote if you don’t want Democrats to flip the state Assembly.
Pat Snyder - R-Wausau (former radio host who saved the maternal health bill)
Shannon Zimmerman - R-River Falls (businessman)
Clint Moses - R-Menomonie (chiropractor)
Ben Franklin - R-DePere (Air Force veteran, small business owner)
Todd Novak - R-Cobb (retired newspaper editor from Iowa County)
Bob Donovan - R-Greenfield, Hales Corners (former alderman)
Bobby Lindsey - R (he is attempting to flip the Ryan Spaude seat in Ashwaubenon. Lindsey is a Marine veteran and former law enforcement officer)
The incumbent Republicans have all been good common sense legislators. Spaude is a Democrat who has voted for a lot of liberal bills.
Some of these seats might be decided by a few hundred votes, and they may decide the future of the state.
There are other great assembly (and senate) candidates and I am not trying to insult anyone by leaving them out. It’s just that the above seven districts are code red with flashing lights.
Unless you want to live in a state with one-party Democratic control, if the governor’s race goes sideways.
Of course, everyone should vote no matter where you live. There are critically important statewide, local and federal races on the ballot also. The governor’s race, AG, state treasurer, other local races, state senate races, congressional races, three constitutional amendments. All of that matters.
Many reasons not to sit home.
The conservatives are Tom Tiffany, Eric Toney, and John Leiber. In this neck of the woods, Jim Croft and Mike Roberts are Republican candidates seeking open state Senate seats.
Jay Schroeder is the Republican running for Secretary of State.
The tight congressional races are for the seats of former Navy SEAL Chief Derrick Van Orden (R) and businessman Bryan Steil (R).
The conservative position on the three amendments is yes, yes, yes.
But I’m elevating the special nature of the above legislative seats.
Turn out.
Christina Giunta retweeted
🚨Stunning City of Milwaukee Spring Election manual shows passwords! It shares laptop credentials and an ExpressVote access code.
It has instructions for changing voter records: showing staff how to:
1) correct records
2) register voters
3) cancel absentee ballots
4) and deactivate applications.
-Those are powers that deserve access restrictions and audit review - but there are none!!
-Pages 41–48 direct staff to deactivate certain continuing absentee applications when replacing a mailed ballot with an in-person ballot. What is going on?
-No clear response to a broken or mismatched equipment seal. Pages 5–6 require daily verification of ExpressVote seal numbers, but do not specify whether staff must stop using the machine, isolate it, preserve evidence, or obtain clearance before restarting it. Checking a seal needs an explicit response when the check fails.
-Incomplete accounting for unused and spoiled ballots. Blank ballot cards and curbside ballots are distributed and stored, but the manual does not clearly require a daily inventory balancing ballots received, issued, spoiled, and remaining. Page 42 mentions a discarded-ballot envelope without explaining its reconciliation or subsequent custody.
-Limited independent review of sensitive record changes. Pages 15 and 41–48 describe corrections, cancellations, and application deactivations. Some procedures involve chiefs or specialists, but the manual does not establish a consistent second-person review or daily examination of transaction logs.
-Unclear handling of defective envelopes awaiting a voter’s return. Page 37 says to retain an envelope missing the voter’s signature so the voter can return. It does not specify a separate secured location, tracking log, custody record, or reconciliation when the envelope is corrected or remains unresolved.
-Network and workstation protections are unexplained. Page 3 directs staff to use password-free library Wi-Fi and ignore Global Protect pop-ups. That deserves clarification about the intended network protection. The manual also does not specify automatic screen locking or what workers must do when leaving a workstation temporarily.
-Manual ballot substitution lacks a documented verification step. Page 36 permits a “sister ward” ballot when the correct curbside ballot is unavailable, followed by reconstruction at Central Count. It references a matching guide, but does not explicitly require an independent check of the substitute ballot or a substitution log.
Who wrote this manual?? Manual obtained by Patriot - but handed out like candy to countless election people. Our elections are complete garbage! @DonMillis @BobSpindell @MayorMKE @cityofmilwaukee @JayWeber3 @VickiMcKenna @DanODonnellShow @EmeraldRobinson @AGToddBlanche @AAGDhillon @realDonaldTrump @JanelBrandtjen @DanEastman2023 @WisGOP @WisGOP7 @wisgop6 @RepDaveMaxey @RepKrug @skrug75 @WisFOIC @JayForWisconsin @TomTiffanyWI @TiffanyWarRoom @EricJToney @Gina4WIAssembly
Read it for yourself, all 48 pages are at the link here:
issuu.com/electionwatch/docs…
First page:
Christina Giunta retweeted
Halloween is typically labeled as the "evil" holiday among religions. But did you know its origins are the exact opposite? 💭🎃
Christina Giunta retweeted
Aaron Siri just revealed the real reason why New York launched a massive legal attack on unvaccinated Amish communities.
“These kids are healthy.”
“They don’t suffer from any of the chronic diseases that plague American children.”
“If this was about health, New York State should be looking at these kids as models and asking, why are they healthier?”
“Why do these… Amish children not suffer from the chronic health conditions that are plaguing over 40% [of children] according to the CDC?”
“Some data reflects even higher.”
“This is up from under 10% of kids having a chronic health condition in America in the early ’80s.”
“What’s changed?”
“Maybe they should take a look at this community instead of trying to force upon them the same type of lifestyle that… has resulted in that increase.”
@AaronSiriSG
Christina Giunta retweeted
I asked @EthicalSkeptic to find CDC data for sudden cardiac death in males ages 5 - 21.
The rate since the rollout of the COVID shots is 7 standard deviations above the baseline rate and is still rising.
@NIHDirector_Jay @SecKennedy
Christina Giunta retweeted
MAHA is on the verge of delivering the biggest wins for health freedom in history.
This is even bigger than 2024.
Why?
The midterms will decide if multiple states pass sweeping bans on medical mandates in 2027.
Idaho already did it.
Your state may be next.
Bookmark this.
Leah Wilson just broke down why we’re on the verge of a health freedom revolution:
“State and local elections matter more than the massive presidential ones.”
“They are counting on you being too tired and too disillusioned to get out and vote for health freedom in November.”
But “more than a dozen of the local races we won this year” were decided by “fewer than 25 votes.”
“Your vote in November absolutely matters.”
The people you elect in 2027 will have the chance to ban medical mandates in your state.
We will be lobbying for Medical Freedom Acts across the states next year.
And we need strong allies in the state legislatures to make it happen.
So we built a 50-state voter guide to make it easy for you to vote for health freedom in your local, state, and national elections.
Check it out below:🧵
“We have done the research.”
“We just need all of you to stand up, stay strong, and vote for health freedom.”
@leah_wilson
Christina Giunta retweeted
Where are the “ Don’t do your own research “ assholes now? There is no Off Switch:
There is no off switch. Here are serial spike protein antibody levels in one of my sickest vaccine-injured patients who went to Japan for DFPP. Clinically, he responded well, and his antibody levels dropped. Six months later, his antibodies are back to what they were before he went.
@EdogawaPatients @NIHDirector_Jay
Christina Giunta retweeted
We live in a Medical PsyOp funded by Billions from Big Pharma. They own the News media, the politicians, celebrities, and most importantly, they have corrupted the top medical journals in the world.
Show this to someone when they vomit up "Trust The Science" propaganda line and act smugnorant.
When will Liberals ever go back to being skeptical of Big Pharma, corporations, the media and captured regulatory agencies like the FDA/CDC etc?
When the editor of the world’s most prestigious medical journal concluded that much of the clinical research it published could no longer be trusted, the problem was no longer abstract.
Marcia Angell, a pathologist who joined the New England Journal of Medicine staff in 1979, rose to executive editor and then served as interim editor-in-chief from 1999 to June 2000. She stepped down after more than two decades at the journal, formally to write a book. The deeper context was her growing conviction, formed from years of editing manuscripts, that pharmaceutical industry influence had compromised the independence of clinical research. She and previous editors had enforced strict conflict-of-interest rules, yet industry-sponsored studies continued to arrive with designs, analyses, and selective reporting that favored the sponsor’s product. Negative results were often suppressed, side effects minimized, and “academic” authors frequently carried undisclosed financial ties.
In a widely cited 2009 New York Review of Books essay, Angell wrote the line that crystallized her position: “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” She described an industry that had shifted from discovering useful drugs toward marketing, co-opting academic medical centers, researchers, and even the journals that were supposed to serve as independent arbiters. Her 2000 editorial “Is Academic Medicine for Sale?” and later book The Truth About the Drug Companies expanded the critique, arguing that commercial priorities systematically distorted what research was done, how it was conducted, and what reached publication.
Angell’s departure marked the end of an era of tighter editorial resistance to industry influence at the NEJM. Her public statements afterward made clear that she viewed the problem as systemic rather than isolated: once the bulk of clinical research depended on commercial funding, journals could no longer function as reliable filters of medical evidence.
Christina Giunta retweeted
When the editor of the world’s most prestigious medical journal concluded that much of the clinical research it published could no longer be trusted, the problem was no longer abstract.
Marcia Angell, a pathologist who joined the New England Journal of Medicine staff in 1979, rose to executive editor and then served as interim editor-in-chief from 1999 to June 2000. She stepped down after more than two decades at the journal, formally to write a book. The deeper context was her growing conviction, formed from years of editing manuscripts, that pharmaceutical industry influence had compromised the independence of clinical research. She and previous editors had enforced strict conflict-of-interest rules, yet industry-sponsored studies continued to arrive with designs, analyses, and selective reporting that favored the sponsor’s product. Negative results were often suppressed, side effects minimized, and “academic” authors frequently carried undisclosed financial ties.
In a widely cited 2009 New York Review of Books essay, Angell wrote the line that crystallized her position: “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” She described an industry that had shifted from discovering useful drugs toward marketing, co-opting academic medical centers, researchers, and even the journals that were supposed to serve as independent arbiters. Her 2000 editorial “Is Academic Medicine for Sale?” and later book The Truth About the Drug Companies expanded the critique, arguing that commercial priorities systematically distorted what research was done, how it was conducted, and what reached publication.
Angell’s departure marked the end of an era of tighter editorial resistance to industry influence at the NEJM. Her public statements afterward made clear that she viewed the problem as systemic rather than isolated: once the bulk of clinical research depended on commercial funding, journals could no longer function as reliable filters of medical evidence.
Christina Giunta retweeted
Charlie Kirk suspected immediately that October 7 was an Israeli false flag. Our leaders ignored him, which is why our empire is now being destroyed by Netanyahu-led wars. Dave Smith on this generation’s 9-11.
Christina Giunta retweeted
"Catholics need to go back to worshipping God, not priests or Pope."
One thing that has always separated Catholics from many other denominations is that as Catholics, we don't come to church because of the priest. We come because of Christ. We come to Mass, we listen to the homily -whether it's boring or interesting- we listen. Then we receive the Holy Eucharist, the source and summit of the Christian life. It nourishes our soul. We say the final prayers and go home.
As Catholics, our reality is this: priests come and go, but the Church remains. We don't go to church because of the priests, scratch that... We go to church because of Jesus.
Let's continue keeping our eyes on Jesus Christ who is truly present in the Holy Eucharist.
Christina Giunta retweeted
Presley Gerber is exposing the “rehab” trap. you go into rehab, they get them off the “illegal” or abused drugs but get them on the legal pills to which they can become addicted
He's sharing how the system can get you dependent to the point where you can't get out of it. I think this was part of the problem he was actually exposing-what a lot of people have been saying about Big Pharma.
The rehab systems in the USA are enormous money makers..
Christina Giunta retweeted
‼️LISTEN‼️ this is Cindy Crawford's son Presley Gerber - just last December/2025 describing the suicidal concoction of medication's his doctors had him on.
.@SecKennedy please get us off the mind altering drugs that they fed us all for anxiety after 9/11 — and every day since.
