☆ ₿EØ ☆

Researching $BNT on @safetrade.

Study this article about $GLDSTN. Only then you know how early you are. The goal is a seat at the table before the product is live and we'll be watching whales buying seats in 1 buy. Every seat demands holding and locking 10M tokens. Which is priced at 65K $ at the moment. Supply shock imminent and parabolic chart come with that. Repricing any moment now. Very clever idea and gonna be fun watching it evolve. The heard still has to find out about @GldstnOnChain. See it as a priviledge you reading this early. 0xfCE34D21A92069100E3226638140706cF03a266E

$NOID to $100

$NOID - Parano1d is a PoW chain that launched Aug 21, created by @ignotus_nemo and funded by a 10% cut of block rewards for its first three years. It showed up on WhatToMine and a couple of tiny exchanges, and the price went from about $0.002 (Sep 17) to $0.64 (Oct 20). Not a call. Some pockets of CT noticed, so I looked at the docs and the explorer. I’d never heard of it until this week. The idea is about one thing: making it cheap to check a blockchain yourself. Think of a blockchain as a shared account book. One way to check today’s balances is to start at page one and work through every payment. Parano1d takes a different approach: the balances come with mathematical proofs your computer can check, showing the transactions followed the rules. You don’t have to take the bookkeeper’s word for it, but you don’t have to redo all their work either. A computer joining the network checks the headers and the proofs, downloads the verified current state, processes up to 18 recent blocks, and it’s in. There are no conventional transaction signatures either; you prove you know a secret without showing it, while addresses and amounts stay public. The author says the whole stack is built to survive quantum computers. I haven’t found a published independent audit of the full cryptography. The mainnet is barely two months old. But someone still has to make those proofs. A producer must finish the proof before the hash race even starts. GPUs in a pool just search for nonces on a block someone else built. So "how many miners" tells you less than "who builds the blocks." I checked. For the first 51 days, the reward was 50 NOID per block with a 20-second target. On Oct 11 it dropped to 16 with a 30-second target. Of the 11.1M NOID issued by Oct 24, 10.5M came out of those first 51 days. 95%. The reward keeps stepping down to a permanent 1 NOID per block; there’s no fixed supply cap. 118 addresses have ever mined a block. In my Oct 24 snapshot, five that first appeared within six blocks of each other on Aug 27 accounted for 62% of all blocks since genesis. A different address first won a block on Oct 16; in the Oct 25 snapshot it alone had 57% of the past week’s. Only 11 reward addresses appeared in that snapshot’s preceding 24 hours. A pool, a private operation, or anons with great timing? Addresses aren’t identities and the chain doesn’t say. The project reports no premine, and the explorer’s reported issuance matches the published reward schedule. The 10% goes to two developer funds, about 1.09M NOID so far, and they publish reports. The first covers launch through Oct 16: about 25k NOID spent on early bug bounties, and 1M NOID locked in two timelocked vault contracts until block 490,000, around Jan 16. The contract files are public, with instructions for checking the locks. Can you do anything today? There’s an official desktop wallet for Mac, Windows and Linux with its own node. NOID pays network fees. You can send payments and use the built-in contracts, timelocked vaults among them, which is what the funds did with their million. You can mine on a laptop with the official CPU miner, but treat it as an experiment, not income. GPU pool mining uses third-party software, including closed-source miners that charge their own fee. Buying: one small exchange does almost all of the volume. What’s next is why I’m gonna keep looking: Around Nov 4 (block 279,370) v2.1’s financial features activate: fixed-supply token launches, bonding curves, a DEX and NFTs. Launchpad tokens require NOID backing that holders can redeem by burning their tokens. When a curve graduates, its proceeds become permanent trading liquidity the creator can’t pull, though traders can still buy and sell against it. That’s the coin’s job in this economy. Whether anyone shows up to use it is the thing we can actually measure. Anyone can verify this chain. One address won 57% of its blocks in the week to Oct 25. Who’s behind it? 🫡

The next 100X on Robinhood was NEVER going to announce itself. And with the vibes I’m getting from this one, it might be it. The chart’s already one of the cleanest on the chain, and it's sitting at 1.2M MC. I aped. Here's the thesis, kept tight. Goldstein is an entire investment bank, think Goldman & Sachs, but onchain. Tokenised index funds, a 3x leverage desk and AAVE-style credit, all under one roof. Every fund is a single token backed by exactly what it holds. - gETH3x for 3x long ETH. - gAIX holding the eight names leading AI. - gUSDG paying real dollar yield. Six funds, with one token each. But here's the part which nobody else has. Goldstein tokenised the FIRM itself. 2,520 NFT Seats, each one a desk at the bank. Your Seat issues funds, earns the fees they throw off, and climbs from Intern to Partner as you stake more $GLDSTN Uniswap v4 hooks skim every swap fee and route it straight to Seat holders by rank. Holding is one thing. Owning a Seat means the bank pays YOU in real fees. A full onchain investment bank with a working fee engine, sat at 1.2M… When the funds go fully live and those 2,520 seats start minting, You’ll see this start to reprice HARD. You're early to the firm before it opens the doors. I'm positioned. CA: 0xfCE34D21A92069100E3226638140706cF03a266E Take your seat before they're gone. - Studious