IE native, Rialto CA is my Hometown Broke Boy I stream sometimes https://teapawt.net/t.co/AU8LAwrpfY
Joined November 2016
- Tweets11.4K
- Following1.2K
- Followers311
- Likes27K
Basic Tweeter ItsCapnSB retweeted
Exposing The Grift: The Critical Drinker Lies About James Gunn's DCU youtu.be/94pSlTu_nNY?si=U7O_…
Basic Tweeter ItsCapnSB retweeted
We got your back, New York!
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Several figures here aren’t federal results or NY-specific. The $472B combines US wide pledges: Micron's $250B is nationwide (NY site $100B) Anthropic's $50B covers TX and NY. The 48% murder drop is from NY's state run GIVE program (28 departments, Jan – May 2026).
arkolith.com/news/news-micr…
therepublic.com/?p=843020
governor.ny.gov/news/safer-str…
Basic Tweeter ItsCapnSB retweeted
lol "If you dont like Hood warfare 2, you shouldn't like GTA" is such a apples to oranges comparison.
GTA games are a commentary on a criminal fantasy that engulfs American culture, shown from many different viewpoints: Black, white, Hispanic etc. They have nuance, and tackle multiple topics about crime, consequences of crime, and characterization from multiple angles.
Hood warfare 2 is just slop about black gang violence with no lessen, no commentary, no nuance.
This is not about activism. People think the game is weird, which is perfectly fine. It's a product that people can like or dislike.
This is EXACTLY why I said what I said!
Most of the people who jumped in didn’t even try to engage with the point. They went straight to the personal attacks:
- coon,
- Sambo,
-talking about my haircut/appearance
- “shuckin and jivin,”
the same tired insults with NO substance!
The point remains: These people are performative and it shows.
They’ll give Rockstar and Activision their money and data for GTA and CoD (and other games) without thinking twice.
But they won’t say a word to actual gang members (because they’re scared of getting beat up or shot).
But a $6 Call of Duty clone is where they suddenly decide to grow a backbone and start clutching their pearls!
And like I said prior: most of them suck at video games anyway!
Thank you for proving my point!
Basic Tweeter ItsCapnSB retweeted
Hi, fuck off!
POV: you just launched $GOOB
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The video in this post uses a character design closely matching animator Doobus Goobus's signature green mascot. Doobus Goobus publicly responded to the post.
x.com/DoobusGoobus/s…
youtube.com/watch?v=kHfj33…
Basic Tweeter ItsCapnSB retweeted
Tokyo Revengers is such a hard watch because of the mc he so useless omg .
Basic Tweeter ItsCapnSB retweeted
Simply disgusting, more than enough evidence to justify detaining his whole “friend group” but once again Amerikkka shows us why this young black man’s life didn’t matter to them
#JusticeforNolanWells
A grand jury unanimously found that there was no evidence to support bringing charges in the death of Nolan Wells, an 18-year-old who was found dead after a Fourth of July trip with friends off the coast of Mississippi. cnn.it/4dRsR5g
Basic Tweeter ItsCapnSB retweeted
Thoughts on the recent MSNOW interview with @hasanthehun
Basic Tweeter ItsCapnSB retweeted
Ashley Moody can dodge a debate, but she can’t dodge her record. $10 million in taxpayer healthcare money was misappropriated, and she knew about the plan.
We’re not moving on.
Appreciate @FLPhoenixNews for the coverage.
Basic Tweeter ItsCapnSB retweeted
Hey assholes, @DNC get the fuck down to Florida and help Angie Nixon!
Basic Tweeter ItsCapnSB retweeted
okayyyy fine... giving away two sets of the new GameBuds (one Matcha🍵 and one Yuzu🍋)
RT + reply which colorway you want
winners chosen by Monday, 9/7
Basic Tweeter ItsCapnSB retweeted
The US is just one giant Epstein island now
A federal appeals court ruled that the First Amendment protects an individual’s right to privately possess images or videos of child sexual abuse created using AI — if the material does not depict a real person and remains in the home.
The court relied on Supreme Court precedents Stanley v. Georgia (1969), which established protections for the private possession of obscene material in the home, and Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (2002), which ruled that certain virtual depictions involving no real children are protected by the First Amendment.
The defendant in the case, Steven Anderegg, was charged with producing and distributing obscene AI-generated images and sending them to a minor over Instagram. The possession charge was dismissed under the Supreme Court precedents.
The judge panel in the case has asked the Supreme Court to “reconsider legal precedents that predate advances in AI.”
(washingtonpost.com/technolog…)
