TC Global Macro retweeted
I see insane things scrolling by on Twitter all day long and keep scrolling, but this is the most insane thing I have seen in many years.
What is wrong with Canada?
TC Global Macro retweeted
Off the rails
Prime Minister Carney came to my hometown of Thunder Bay this week to announce that Ottawa will spend $4.7 billion on 313 new VIA Rail passenger cars manufactured by Alstom in Thunder Bay and Quebec.
The announcement was understandably well received back home. It will support nearly 700 jobs and provide a welcome shot in the arm for a community that could use it. I am glad for the workers and their families.
At some risk of offending my fellow Thunder Bayers, however, the most important question isn’t whether the trains could have been built more cheaply somewhere else, as some have raised. It’s whether Ottawa should be replacing VIA Rail’s trains at all.
Canadians have largely answered no through their own transportation choices. VIA recorded 4.4 million passenger trips in 2025, down roughly 12 percent from its 2019 peak despite significant population growth.
This shouldn’t be a huge surprise. VIA’s on-time performance was just 35 percent, and yet its prices aren’t especially competitive with air or car travel. It’s a self-evidently inferior experience.
The consequence is that the Crown corporation’s financial results are deteriorating. Last year, VIA generated $518.5 million in revenue against $894.2 million in operating expenses. Federal funding totalled $735.5 million, following more than $900 million the previous year.
Every single route fails to break even and requires an operating subsidy. In some cases, like Toronto to Ottawa, the subsidy is about $50 per passenger. In others, like Toronto to Vancouver, it’s almost $1,000 per passenger.
As explained by the government, the new cars being built in Thunder Bay are intended to serve eight long-distance, regional, and remote routes that carried only 216,000 passenger trips last year. Given the operating and capital expenses, it’s not obvious that it wouldn’t be cheaper to purchase the affected travellers their plane tickets or even cars.
Budgeting is policy. This week’s announcement therefore amounts to a long-run endorsement of VIA Rail and its current business model. The new fleet will become the justification for continuing the routes, and the continuing routes will become the justification for ongoing operating subsidies and capital funding. At no point is the institution itself required to demonstrate that Canadians actually want what it provides at anything approaching its real cost.
VIA has come to resemble the CBC in this respect. Both institutions command a kind of emotional attachment among politicians, commentators and a segment of the public. They’re treated as expressions of Canadian identity whose continuation is inherently valuable. Yet Canadians’ own choices reveal considerably far less attachment. They may like the idea of VIA Rail or the CBC without riding its trains or consuming its programming.
Public policy should take those revealed preferences seriously. Governments routinely claim to act on behalf of Canadians while discounting the clearest evidence they provide about what they actually value.
Thunder Bay can celebrate the jobs without the rest of us pretending that the real question about VIA Rail has been answered. Before spending billions to give a chronically subsidized and lightly used passenger railway several more decades of life, Ottawa should ask whether Canadians have already rendered their verdict—and whether the government simply refuses to hear it.
thehub.ca/2026/09/04/the-cra…
What ever happened to PM Carney’s election promise of “the strongest economy in the G7”? What even happened to FM Champagne’s forecast of “2nd strongest economy in G7”? Based on Q1, Canada is the 2nd weakest economy in G7, edging out France for last place.
Canada’s Economy Contracts for a Second Straight Quarter - The Wall Street Journal What happened to PM Carney’s promise of “strongest economy in the G7”? apple.news/Am5xLbxjxRUewnLYM…
Is this what Michael Burry is talking about? As Alfred E Neumann would say, "What Me Worry?".
Michael Burry says market feels like 'the last months of the 1999-2000 bubble' @CNBC yellow card for always giving this guy huge headlines mr negative and usually wrong 😑 cnbc.com/2026/05/08/michael-…
We need statements like this in Canada. #cdnpoli
This is a good illustration of why I backed @KemiBadenoch to be Conservative leader, and why I’ll back her to be Prime Minister. She has conviction, clarity, and courage.
Carney announces Canada’s first ever sovereign wealth fund with an initial endowment of $25-billion - The Globe and Mail … but where will the endowment come from? Borrowed? Shifted out of existing government assets? Printed? #cdneco #cdnpoli apple.news/AM8oZ7efkRkCM8BP5…
TC Global Macro retweeted
I watched @MarkJCarney’s “Forward Guidance” video yesterday. It was polished, well-produced - and ultimately unconvincing.
Even more concerning was the uncritical amplification by parts of the media, airing a 10-minute political message in full as if it were neutral analysis.
If you’ve been watching NHL games streamed on Sportsnet+ lately, you’ve likely seen the same theme repeated in high-production ads. The word of the day: “rupture.” It’s a neat piece of messaging. But it raises a bigger question: is this leadership - or marketing?
Here’s where the narrative falls apart:
1. Fear isn’t leadership.
Fear-stoking is a powerful way to manipulate people. Using words like “crisis” or phrases like “stakes could not be higher..” is classic fear-stoking. Framing our economic relationship with the U.S. as a “weakness” to be “corrected” may be politically convenient, but it ignores reality. The U.S. is our largest trading partner and a critical driver of our prosperity. That’s not changing anytime soon. Strong leaders manage that relationship - they don’t recast it as a liability to justify policy shifts and score political points.
2. The math doesn’t hold up.
We’re told in the video that families will save “over $840” from the 1% tax cut to the lowest marginal personal tax rate. That number appears to double a theoretical maximum. The Parliamentary Budget Officer has suggested average savings are closer to ~$190 per person. That’s hardly transformative. Similarly, targeted GST tweaks on housing are unlikely to materially change affordability for most Canadians.
3. “Catalyze $1 trillion of investment” needs context.
Ambitious soundbites are easy. Reality is harder. Over the past decade, more than $1 trillion in capital has quietly left Canada, the largest capital exodus in Canadian history. Before we celebrate new inflows, we should ask: why did that capital leave in the first place?
4. Canada needs real “Big Bang” tax reform - not boutique tweaks.
If we’re serious about competitiveness, we need to fix the fundamentals:
- Materially lower personal tax rates to remain competitive globally and reduce brain drain
- Encourage reinvestment through smarter corporate taxation (Estonia offers a useful model)
- Eliminate complex, low-impact credits that add cost without improving productivity
5. Execution matters more than messaging.
Investors don’t deploy capital because of YouTube videos or ad campaigns during hockey games. They invest where there is stability, clarity, and a tax and regulatory system that rewards risk-taking and success.
Canada has enormous advantages - resources, geography, talent. But those advantages don’t convert into prosperity without sound policy.
We don’t need more messaging about how high the stakes are and fear-stoking. We need leadership that addresses capital flight, restores competitiveness, and focuses on execution over optics.
That would be real forward guidance.
youtu.be/uk2TZwkhi4E?si=lCIK…
The 100 investors are not private companies that require an attractive tax and regulatory environment to invest. The investors Carney is inviting are sovereign wealth funds and foreign pension funds who are looking for guaranteed returns. #cdneco #cdnpoli cbc.ca/news/business/armstro…
Here’s another example: Suppose you drive a Ford F150 pickup truck. Here’s a price comparison with 5 years ago: #cdnecon
If you want to compare this with the price of an F150 in the CPI, you’ll be frustrated to find that StatCan discontinued the price index for trucks in 2022. Why? Because they introduced used cars and trucks to the CPI and had to start a new series and they didn’t do one for trucks. #cdnecon
But they have a series for passenger vehicles and you will see that price rose 16.5% over the past 5 years compared with the actual 55% increase in the base price of an F150 truck. That’s only 1/3rd of the actual price increase. #cdnecon
Canadians that I know perceive inflation to be higher than the official CPI data suggests. I wonder why? Here is an example: the price of dry cleaning.
Dry cleaning prices are no longer available from StatCan in the CPI. The index was terminated in 2021. Why? The lockdowns caused demand for dry cleaning to collapse and its weight in the consumer spending made it insignificant. Many dry cleaners went out of business. #cdnecon
Because of its reduced weight, the 40 to 50% rise in dry cleaning prices doesn’t get into the CPI. But if you need a shirt or a sweater dry cleaned, you experience the inflation. #cdnecon













