Comms & public affairs professional; #foreverjourno; political animal; opinionista. I follow Jesus - Rom 1:16. Tweets in my personal capacity.

England, United Kingdom
Joined February 2010
Contradictions in the "demoractic" alternative. The principal is adamant that his religious beliefs will lead to a democratic breakthrough, while his protégé, on the other hand, seems convinced that only organised human agency, can facilitate democratisation in the motherland.
10
10
7
21
5,692
Deep breath… So there’s a pastor whose wife introduced his second wife over the pulpit and announced that they’re in a polygamous relationship…. In the year of our Lord Savior 2026. And now I keep seeing, “Why is everybody upset? Polygamy is biblical”post 😭 but yall just because  something was written or noted in the Bible doesn’t make it holy. And I get it… it’s not a secret that Jacob had more than one wife, David, Solomon… But nobody talks about how Jacob was tricked into marrying two women… No one talks about how David’s need to have multiple women led to adultery and murder and later incest and later, a son killing another AND attempting to kill David, and later killed in battle by David’s warriors… We never unpack Solomon and his many wives and how it turned him away from God, and because of that his kingdom legacy was split and fell… Because the Bible says his wives turned his heart toward other gods. So why do we keep mentioning how many women they had without mentioning where the story went… And let me acknowledge this the Old Testament contains laws regulating households with multiple wives. I’m not going to pretend those passages don’t exist. But explaining what was permitted and regulated in ancient Israel doesnt settle what Christ said in the New Testament or the responsibilities of a pastor. Because that’s the part people keep skipping. We are talking about a PASTOR. Which 1st Timothy 3:2 and Titus 1:6 identify as the husband of one wife as a qualification for church leadership. The same passage requires self control and a life above reproach. So how are we reaching for Solomon and David while stepping over the passage addressing the very office this man holds? And more than anything, this comes down to FINAL AUTHORITY. When Christ spoke about marriage in Matthew 19:4–6, He spoke of a man joined to his wife. Singular. And He said the TWO become ONE flesh. So why are we searching through everybody else’s life for permission to move away from what Christ taught? Because if you call Him Lord, His teaching has to carry more authority over your life than the behavior of somebody else you read about. You can’t keep reaching for David’s example while ignoring Christ’s instruction. You can’t keep pointing to Solomon’s wives while overlooking where those relationships led him. And at some point, you have to ask yourself am I following Christ, or am I following whichever person in Scripture makes room for what I already want? Because if David’s choices carry more weight with you than Christ’s words, David has become the example and the god you obey. If Solomon’s relationships give you permission to dismiss what Christ taught, Solomon has become your idol of authority. And you have to wrestle with the fact that you’ve chosen a man over the teaching of the One you call Lord. Because if Christ led us back to original intent of marriage as singular TWO becoming ONE… who really has the final authority? And why is His word not enough for you?
285
378
49
1,954
122,414
#TrueStory These pieces of my first-ever business card took me back in time. A long, long time ago, I was 24, a freshly minted veterinarian, when a ponytailed, 23-year-old @kennethrsharpe drove to my one-room lodgings in Uplands, Waterfalls, Harare, and offered me a job. While my fellow fresh vets were cutting, stitching and sticking their ungloved arms up cows’ behinds to diagnose pregnancies, I was getting my baptism of fire in the business world alongside Ken, a serial entrepreneur. To this day, Ken is one of the hardest-working people I have known. No job was beneath the MD: sweeping floors, making coffee for his staff, loading and driving trucks, and everything in between. He rolled up his sleeves and got on with whatever needed doing. As for me, the business card said veterinary consultant, but I did everything: making deliveries, negotiating with buyers, haggling for shelf space and gondola ends, running in-store promotions and supporting dog and cat shows across the country. The vet in me came out only when I advised breeders on performance nutrition and discussed life-stage and clinical nutrition with grey-haired vets. I spent just a year at Westridge, but the lessons there laid a firm foundation for the broad tapestry of pursuits I have undertaken since. Knowing Ken's work ethic and ambition, I am hardly surprised he has been tackling projects that seemed unachievable at first. Munin'ina, Ken, keep going - we come from far😜. #SundaySalutations
13
16
122
9,408
I wanted the noise to subside before commenting on this artistic impression of the Mwenemutapa. Clearly the figure in the meme is black (in the broader definition of blackness). However, the hair is woolly, but neither brunette nor blonde. The facial features look Eastly and the symbols of power; crown and scepter foreign. Is this a true reflection of Mwenemutapa? Yes. Symbols of power. Beginning in BC times, Zimbabwe/Sasos/Chivavarigwa traded with Asia Minor. Rich Africans wore fine linen clothes and jewelery (ndoro chena/ tsambo chena). It was not out of place for kings to adorn themselves with products of gold which in any case was mined from their empire. Phenotype. Merchants from Asia Minor visited Sasos/Chivavarigwa (Zimbabwe) without spouses. For more than a thousand years, they had mixed blood children with African women who in turn had children even in royal families. By the early 16th century Sofala had a bursting population of colored merchants called Moors and it was ruled by a Moor/Colored. In the Mutapa state alone, 10000 Moors lived there. The Mutapa empire had vassals, those who ruled on his behalf and some of them were of mixed blood, for example, the chief Justice of King Kwesaringo was a Moor who used the title Changa Ameer from which Shona derived Changamire. In 1629 after the fall of Mwenemutapa Kapuratsine a new Coloured Mwenemutapa, Don Phillip Mavura, was installed by the Portuguese. He was a descendant of Mutapa. Is the meme a reflection of the history of the time? Yes. This picture could have been one of the children from mixed blood but descending from the royal house.
28
22
2
85
9,696
Replying to @AsakyGRN
BRETHREN LISTEN!!! 1 Timothy 3:2 (KJV): “A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of ONE WIFE, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach;”
44
66
5
1,088
101,613
Just had to take some snaps and share with y’all 🫠💜
49
109
20
769
300,872
Chofamba retweeted
March and March are “Peaceful”
128
145
43
515
77,138
Chimbozvinzwirai mega 😆🤣😂
59
125
7
830
65,351
The much-awaited ZANUPF conference came and went, ending yesterday in Chinhoyi. There is no need for lengthy analysis. Only two things matter. The succession contest is between Vice President General Constantino Chiwenga and President Emmerson Mnangagwa. The President still wants power, is in no hurry to be succeeded, and if the day ever comes, he does not want his deputy to take over. He prefers someone else. The Vice President succeeded in blocking the resolutions from being discussed at the Politburo. He then delivered a rock star speech at the conference on Friday. But the real question is this: did he win anything? President Mnangagwa and his allies wanted resolutions that would cement the national constitutional changes made through CAB3, now Constitutional Amendment Act No. 3. The resolutions sought to align the ZANUPF constitution with those changes, to move the party congress from 2027 to 2029, and to make President Mnangagwa the sole, uncontested candidate to lead ZANUPF in 2029. That would make him the automatic candidate in 2030, when, under the new constitution, the President will be elected by Parliament. So who won? Politically, President Mnangagwa. General Chiwenga gave a powerful speech that got the media and the country talking, but it earned him nothing, because the very changes he was trying to stop were adopted. The hostility shown by provincial chairmen and chairwomen, captured in parts of this video, tells you exactly where power lies. As I have said before, General Chiwenga was outmanoeuvred politically. It began when President Mnangagwa removed the running mate clause. That was the moment the Vice President should have pushed back, knowing beyond any doubt that his boss did not want him as successor and was not ready to go. Instead, he cheered him on. It was General Chiwenga who championed the 2030 agenda, telling the opposition that President Mnangagwa could rule for as long as he wanted and there was nothing they could do about it. It was General Chiwenga who anointed him as a Munhumutapa, a king. He said all this without realising the ground was shifting beneath his own feet. Emotionally, he has won the sympathy of many outside ZANUPF, and probably of some inside who are too afraid to be seen backing him. But in politics, where it truly matters, he was outmanoeuvred again in Chinhoyi. His speech was full of sound and fury, and it resonated across the country. Yet speeches do not win succession battles. President Mnangagwa walked away with the resolutions he wanted, backed by the party, by hook or by crook. So what can General Chiwenga do now? Realistically, his only remaining leverage is the military. If the army is behind him and willing to act, that is his saving grace. Without it, he is finished. He cannot beat President Mnangagwa politically, because President Mnangagwa controls the ZANUPF political machine. His only other window is if President Mnangagwa dies and the political ground shifts. But waiting for a rival to die and hoping to outlive him is not a political strategy. It is leaving your fate to nature and to God. And as we saw with former President Robert Mugabe, these men can live well into their nineties. Who will eventually succeed President Mnangagwa will be decided by the changes being made inside ZANUPF, and he has made it absolutely clear that he does not want General Chiwenga. Do not be fooled by their empty talk of unity. There is no harmony in that party. They are at war with each other, and so far, President Mnangagwa's side is winning. They hold power, and they control the money. With money, you can go far. They even brought parts of the opposition on side. At the time, General Chiwenga supported what was being done to the opposition, failing to see that President Mnangagwa was not acting for ZANUPF or its survival. He was acting for himself. To these men, ZANUPF is simply a vehicle for elections. They do not act for the party. They act for themselves. Many people on social media believe General Chiwenga could soon be fired as Vice President. I see it differently. President Mnangagwa learned from 2017 that firing your deputy in the middle of a war with him can trigger consequences you never intended. I do not see him getting rid of General Chiwenga. He will keep him exactly where he is and continue to frustrate him. The reality is that President Mnangagwa keeps getting what he wants, with or without General Chiwenga in the room. Tactically, there is no reason to remove a man who has failed to stop a single thing the President has set out to do. In fact, I believe the Vice President now wants to be fired. He is growing bolder in what he says. A man with a powerful force behind him does not need to say much. He simply acts. The fact that General Chiwenga is talking so much points to one of two things. Either he wants to be fired so that it triggers action, or he is desperate, cornered, and speech is the only weapon he has left. I lean towards the first. I believe he wants to provoke action, and his boss knows it. That is precisely why President Mnangagwa will not fire him. As long as he remains in charge and continues to make the decisions he wants, he has no reason to hand his deputy the trigger he is looking for. As for a coup, I have said for the past two years that the chances are slim from what I can see. But they are not zero. It cannot be ruled out. Then there is the region. Much of what Wicknell Chivayo did for President Mnangagwa looked comical at the time, but it was far more than that. He helped bring regional leaders on side, travelling to South Africa, Tanzania, Kenya, Eswatini, Zambia and Mozambique. He also flew into Botswana, though I do not know what came of that. We saw deals. What we did not see was what those deals were building. Whatever their nature, they strengthened President Mnangagwa's support base across Southern Africa and into East Africa. Those deals bind these leaders together. Given a choice between President Mnangagwa and General Chiwenga, the region will choose the man they have already done business with. Internationally, General Chiwenga is believed to have China on his side. How deep that support runs, I honestly do not know, and I would be lying if I claimed otherwise. What I can say, from my conversations with various diplomats, is that some Western countries are quietly content with President Mnangagwa remaining in power. They see in him stability and predictability, a guarantee that their interests will be protected. They know him. They know that when he strikes a deal, he delivers, as he did with the compensation deal for former white farmers. He understood that continuing those payments would buy him Western support, economic and political. I have read that President Donald Trump is sending a team to meet him. President Trump has no interest in human rights or democracy. He is interested in trade and deals. If President Mnangagwa delivers what that delegation wants, he will have America's support. Britain, too, is focused on investment and trade. The new British Ambassador, Gill Lever, has made it clear that her priorities are trade, investment and people-to-people links. Human rights are not at the top of that list. And in any case, when it comes to human rights, there is no better candidate within ZANUPF. They are all the same, so it is no longer an issue. There is no opposition to speak of, and none to support. Western countries will simply work with the government of the day. That is President Mnangagwa's strength right now, and it is General Chiwenga's great weakness. The Vice President has made no serious effort to engage these countries. Whether that is by design or through incompetence, one would have to dig deeper to find out. President Mnangagwa has got everything he wanted. He has elevated his lieutenants, making businessman Kudakwashe Tagwirei a senator and now Minister of Economic Development and Investment Promotion, and keeping Paul Tungwarara close as his investment adviser. He has sidelined General Chiwenga's allies, demoting Obert Mpofu from ZANUPF Secretary General and removing Lieutenant General Engelbert Rugeje as the party's National Political Commissar, and now dumped from the politburo. He has also reshaped the military, placing his own people in key positions and removing commanders believed to be loyal to General Chiwenga. The clearest example is Lieutenant General Anselem Nhamo Sanyatwe, who was retired as Commander of the Zimbabwe National Army and moved into Cabinet as Minister of Sport, Recreation, Arts and Culture, taking him away from the troops and into a ministry far from the barracks. Each move has gone through without resistance. He has proved, beyond doubt, that he controls the party, the state and the army. In a nutshell, General Chiwenga enjoys wide support outside his own party. Many Zimbabweans, left without an opposition to believe in, are now rallying behind him as the only man who can end President Mnangagwa's rule. President Mnangagwa may not have the country behind him, but he has something more decisive. He commands the state machinery, controls the ZANUPF engine, and has deep pockets to drive his political projects through. And the nation? We are mere spectators to a battle raging inside ZANUPF. Spectators, and nothing more. The people's sympathy against the power of the state. Who will win? Time will tell.
186
106
15
733
268,671
Destination Zimbabwe is delighted to welcome Sir Jim Ratcliffe, co-owner of Manchester United, who is in the country enjoying our offerings. Thank you for spending time in our beautiful destination, Sir Jim. #ExperienceZimbabwe #NhakaYedu #IlifaLethu #OurHeritage #ThisIsUs #ZimBho 👍
91
264
52
1,317
82,650
Chofamba retweeted
When Chiwenga used the army in 2008, 2013, 2018 and 2019 to close off the democratic space, he thought he was fixing the opposition. Now that their program of dismantling the culture and norms that underping democracy is complete, he is now trying to rouse the conscience of a party that long departed from those norms. No one to fight for him and his right to be heard. Kuitira vamwe kuzviitira. #HandeiTione
45
122
5
517
21,607
Chofamba retweeted
In any functional democracy with real competition, the moment you put your name forward and promise to lead, those promises stop being campaign slogans and become obligations. You don't get to open your mouth, type nonsense like “kurikuuya chapwati, wait for the signal,” collect money, and walk away when nothing materialises. Nelson Chamisa did exactly that. People donated to buy him a car because they believed he had a serious plan. Organisations put resources behind him not because he was uniquely gifted, but because he was carrying the hopes of millions of Zimbabweans who are exhausted and desperate for something better. That hope was treated as a resource to be harvested. We cannot keep normalising an environment where opposition figures take advantage of that desperation, promise the impossible, raise money, inflate their personal profiles, and then deliver nothing of substance while their supporters refuse to notice. If we treat our leaders as above criticism, what exactly separates us from ZANU-PF supporters? At least ZANU-PF’s base is largely consistent in defending power. What do we have? Grown men celebrating that Chamisa is more famous than other opposition figures, as if personal popularity somehow weakens ZANU-PF or improves anyone’s life. It doesn’t. It just feeds the same cycle of hype, fundraising, and disappointment. Holding leaders accountable is not disloyalty; failing to do so is how you become the thing you claim to oppose.
If the sun fails to come out, its @nelsonchamisa’s fault.😂😂😂🙌🏿
27
7
3
19
6,557
Replying to @adv_fulcrum
Senator Tagwirei as Minister of Economic Development is state capture made official. Referee now player. How can he regulate an economy he dominates? It kills fair competition, scares investors, tells youth: merit doesn't matter, proximity to power does.
4
42
6,411
Chofamba retweeted
Zimbabwe lithium sales surge as mineral exports double to US$4.7 billion ♦️ Lithium accounted for 45.6 percent of all mineral sales and overtook the platinum group metals zimlive.com/zimbabwe-lithium…
16
49
8
216
16,981
🔸Let’s just be clear: mufi was a private citizen and not a national leader or figure. He did not occupy any public, state or official role whatsoever, not even that of a ward councillor. The line between national or state business and private business must always be clear. It’s perfectly fine to mourn your beloved friend and show your sadness in a difficult moment for you and your loved ones. Most will respect your right to do so. What you cannot do is rope the entire nation in as if we were part and parcel of the business he was engaged in. We were not. We cannot start to be now. We need new leaders.🇿🇼
92
376
12
2,137
79,137
🚨 ATTENTION: PARACETAMOL IN BEEF There have been reports of paracetamol (Panadol) being added to tough beef to make it soften and cook faster, potentially saving cooking time and fuel. ⚠️ THIS IS DANGEROUS. Paracetamol is medicine, not a meat tenderiser or food ingredient. Eating meat prepared this way could expose you to an unknown amount of paracetamol. Excessive paracetamol can cause serious liver damage and even liver failure. 🔥Heating paracetamol is another concern. Research has raised concerns that prolonged heating can cause paracetamol to break down into potentially toxic compounds, adding another unknown risk to consuming food prepared this way. Importantly, reports of this practice exist, but we do not have reliable evidence showing how widespread it is. Please share for awareness. Paracetamol belongs in the medicine cabinet & NOT in the cooking pot. TEAM FULO Food • Health • Awareness
20
29
2
50
11,758
Replying to @Chofamba
Yebo Sithole bantu baka Soshangane
1
2
229
Chofamba retweeted
Replying to @Chofamba
Izwai mkoma wedu Liberty Sithole
4
6
1
25
1,211
Chofamba retweeted
I am Ndau from Chimanimani, and yes, we are Zimbabwean. I am not a Manyika ,we both come from Manicaland yes. @RangaNaiti
52
121
22
619
72,651