@CitizynKayne (@CitizynKayne) header
@CitizynKayne (@CitizynKayne) profile picture

GenX Disruption, forces evolution. Net Zero, D:10-289 in action. Opinions, like weather, change.

Permanent State of Flux
Joined March 2021
Photo by @CitizynKayne (@CitizynKayne)Photo by @CitizynKayne (@CitizynKayne)Photo by @CitizynKayne (@CitizynKayne)Photo by @CitizynKayne (@CitizynKayne)Photo by @CitizynKayne (@CitizynKayne)Photo by @CitizynKayne (@CitizynKayne)Photo by @CitizynKayne (@CitizynKayne)Photo by @CitizynKayne (@CitizynKayne)Photo by @CitizynKayne (@CitizynKayne)Photo by @CitizynKayne (@CitizynKayne)
Replying to @DeepLeaksHQ
Who doesn’t yet know this?
5
51
1,478
“‘When a public debate is still alive in our legislatures, in our courts and in the courts of comparable democracy, may a professional regulator decide which side is correct and then discipline a professional who is on the other side? We say it may not,’ said @LDBildy. Bildy highlighted examples of what she claimed were inconsistencies in the panel's findings of discrimination.  She said a personal essay Hamm wrote containing the line ‘woman is not a feeling, woman just is’ was found by the BCCNM panel to be ‘discriminatory erasure.’ In another instance Hamm wrote ‘men cannot become women,’ which was also found to be discriminatory.” Surprisingly good coverage of day 1 of @preta_6’s trial by @CBCNews: cbc.ca/news/canada/british-c…
14
86
7
311
5,246
@CitizynKayne retweeted
VERDICT ALERT: A unanimous federal jury in deep-blue Tacoma just awarded my client $150,000 for violation of her constitutional rights in this case. We are also scheduled to go to trial in February against the Department of Corrections in state court on her negligence claims.
LAWSUIT ALERT: My law firm is suing the Washington State Department of Corrections, alleging that our female client was locked in a cage with a biologically male predator who sexually assaulted her. A link to the @realDailyWire story by @MaryMargOlohan can be found below.
149
601
65
2,680
130,623
@CitizynKayne retweeted
The £2 bus fare cap could cost £400m in Scotland but has cost £500m in England for 10 times the population and there are no details on why it is so much more expensive. Such high spending of public money should be properly assessed and costed to ensure best value is delivered.
60
98
15
470
28,692
@CitizynKayne retweeted
‘My viewers and I are PAYING you to sit in the House of Lords!’ @MichelleDewbs CLASHES with Lord Foulkes over his apparent LACK of knowledge of the Rhiannon Skye Whyte case, questioning how someone in a position of power can be unaware of a SERIOUS immigration-related story.
410
692
54
3,418
81,454
@CitizynKayne retweeted
Spotted today in midtown Kansas City. Unfortunately, on some level, you do kind of gotta hand it to this guy
925
1,470
442
31,134
879,926
The UN are clearly UNfit for women. We are dismayed (to say the very least) that they would even consider a country such as Iran as a member of any body that plays a role in shaping women's rights. Iran oppresses women and girls. They oppress the female sex. We'll take no lectures from the UN on the rights of women while they even entertain this. nationalpost.com/opinion/hil…
The Women’s Policy Centre strongly opposes the appointment of the Islamic regime of Iran to key organ at the @UN shaping priorities on women's rights and terrorism prevention. We are calling on @AnitaAnandMP @MarkJCarney to reverse course. Canada can stop this travesty as @HillelNeuer rightly points out. nationalpost.com/opinion/hil…
12
180
3
515
20,572
@CitizynKayne retweeted
When I spoke at the UN in Geneva they cleared the room after me of all women because the Taliban would not entertain them in their Meeting! Disgraceful useless out of date organisation
The UN are clearly UNfit for women. We are dismayed (to say the very least) that they would even consider a country such as Iran as a member of any body that plays a role in shaping women's rights. Iran oppresses women and girls. They oppress the female sex. We'll take no lectures from the UN on the rights of women while they even entertain this. nationalpost.com/opinion/hil…
24
684
4
2,586
17,950
@CitizynKayne retweeted
Britain PLC is facing bankruptcy, and the board hasn’t got a clue. Read WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THE ALBION? – the short, sharp, laugh-out-loud allegory people are calling ‘the best political read of the year’.

17
91
1
389
150,838
@CitizynKayne retweeted
Under the banner of 'saving the planet', a far-reaching political transformation is taking place — and it's happening out of sight. Behind unelected figureheads like António Guterres (Secretary-General of the United Nations) stands a vast, featureless apparatus: thousands of embedded bureaucrats shaping policy far from public oversight. The UN has already morphed into one of the largest unelected institutions in world history, absorbing $68 to $74 billion annually. This includes billions for opaque peacekeeping forays and billions more to maintain a global workforce of up to 190,000 personnel — not one of whom pays income tax. Beyond them lies a vast money-hungry corporate queue waiting to cash in on this forced transition away from dense, dependable power toward intermittent wind and solar. This transition is projected to absorb $275 trillion. The bureaucracy builds the machinery; the market gets the payout. This is much more than 'overreach' — it's a calculated PR strategy. By exploiting extreme, worst-case climate scenarios, they have created a permanent state of hyper-emergency. As policy analysts at free-market institutes like Cato have long pointed out, IPCC computer models consistently overestimate actual warming, elevating fringe worst-case projections into accepted policy inevitabilities. Beneath the cover of this overheated crisis, national sovereignty is being dismantled and local democracy replaced by an unaccountable regime. It's an unprecedented transfer of wealth and political control designed to concentrate power in the hands of a few. While near-term carbon credit transactions are projected to remain under $10 billion through 2030, the framework is set up to yield a multi-hundred-billion-dollar annual payout by the 2040s. Guterres and the UN apparatus say these measures are dictated by physical reality. Yet, their remedies all point toward expanded administrative authority and direct global control over world finances.
🤖 Made with AI
74
601
69
1,067
12,966
@CitizynKayne retweeted
1/ Serious Law firms are now raising problems with the conversion bill. I’m really concerned the deadline for submitting evidence is this coming Monday16th at 5PM This is an absurdly short timescale for people just getting to understand it. irwinmitchell.com/news-and-i…
6
129
3
367
7,545
@CitizynKayne retweeted
From Pakistan to Universal Credit in 8-10 months: - get job as a 'skilled worker' - wife/children can now apply for visas - all arrive in UK with Day 1 NHS access - BBQ Hut closes, job lost - apply for asylum - 6 months to positive decision - you can now access all benefits
For the past 3 months i've been looking at widespread fraud within the Home Office and the 'skilled worker' visa system, and I can summarise my findings as follows:
2
95
4
336
4,412
@CitizynKayne retweeted
INSANE: A spy chief is terrorizing an International Criminal Court prosecutor, threatening her safety, family and career, showing secret photos of her husband to coerce her into dropping a war-crimes probe. Which intelligence agency does he lead? Agency only @grok
93
2,754
63
9,390
351,928
@CitizynKayne retweeted
A simple 10 sec. once in a lifetime cheek swab would sort this out. The IOC will be sex screening all female athletes in LA. It will be interesting to see how many footballers aren’t there as FIFA are one of the only remaining sports NOT to protect its female players from potential injury & offer fairness. telegraph.co.uk/gift/e739190…
16
109
1
640
9,584
@CitizynKayne retweeted
The Byline Times is angry about a Spectator article criticising the government for giving money to the Bylines Network. Regardless of how closely linked they are (Peter Jukes is a director of both), should it be it getting taxpayers' money? 🧵
9
55
2
282
13,442
@CitizynKayne retweeted
Yesterday, over 550,000 people read my post exposing the carefully managed PR statements hiding the David Walliams scandal. Today, the cowardice of the British media establishment has reached an entirely new level. Jonathan Ross just released a public statement claiming he is horrified by the allegations against Walliams and the crimes of Russell Brand. He actually expects the public to believe he spent two decades sharing green rooms and VIP parties with these men while remaining completely blind to their behavior. Look at the exact historical record they are trying to erase right now. In 2004, Ross stood on a live stage at the British Comedy Awards and explicitly joked that the 15-year-old award was drunk and probably going home with David Walliams. There is literally a photograph from 2003 showing Ross and other elite broadcasters smiling for the camera while Walliams sits right next to them with his arm draped around a teenager he is now accused of pursuing. You do not broadcast jokes about 15-year-olds going home with a television star to millions of viewers unless the entire industry already knows exactly what the punchline means. The British entertainment industry operated as a closed protection racket for twenty years. They turned predatory behavior into profitable television ratings and laughed off the abuse as cheeky celebrity banter. These presenters are not releasing statements today because they are shocked by what Walliams and Brand actually did. They are releasing them because the expensive legal injunctions are finally failing, and they are terrified the public is coming for the enablers next.
401
1,767
82
8,390
659,273
@CitizynKayne retweeted
We’ve issued an official warning to Lewisham Islamic Centre for “inflammatory” comments, requiring the charity to improve it's handling of speakers and events hosted at its premises. Read more: gov.uk/government/news/offic…
230
213
51
752
127,255
@CitizynKayne retweeted
A headteacher wrote to parents to tell them Mr X would now be known as Miss X. I've seen the letter. The letter said 'Miss X' had already spoken to pupils about his pronouns. It also praised his courage and warned that unkindness towards him would not be tolerated. And, basically, told families that talking openly about it would be disrespectful to the teacher involved. Here are some of the safeguarding questions I’ve put to the school in my 'right of reply' request (heavily redacted to protect identities): - Should a male teacher be telling young children he identifies as a woman and asking them to call him ‘Miss’? - Were parents informed about his 'pronoun talk' beforehand? Could they ask for their child to sit out if they felt the subject was unsuitable? - If pupils have been told a male teacher is a woman, what safeguarding implications did the school consider? - Does the teacher use any female-only facilities? Do his duties involve supervising girls in toilets or changing rooms, including when they go swimming? - Could a child be disciplined for saying the teacher is male or declining to call him ‘Miss’? Then there’s the question of what happens when parents or staff raise concerns. Will the school take their gender-critical beliefs seriously or will they be told they’re discriminating against the teacher? Given the person who highlighted this to me asked to remain anonymous, it doesn't look promising. I’ll wait to hear what the school has to say. But parents shouldn’t need a journalist to find out what their children were told in class, what they were expected to say in response, or how the school would handle it if they disagreed.
52
146
12
548
26,869