City Castles (@CityCastles) profile picture

Publisher of children's books & other delights; lover of writing. Followed by: @LauraLoomer @Roz_Morris @FiftyFiftyGirl @ElizabethforNV https://usahellfirepamp

Colorado, USA
Joined July 2009
Photo by City Castles (@CityCastles)Photo by City Castles (@CityCastles)Photo by City Castles (@CityCastles)Photo by City Castles (@CityCastles)Photo by City Castles (@CityCastles)Photo by City Castles (@CityCastles)Photo by City Castles (@CityCastles)Photo by City Castles (@CityCastles)Photo by City Castles (@CityCastles)Photo by City Castles (@CityCastles)
City Castles retweeted
In just these past two weeks we have seen: 1. Widespread civil unrest and riots in France. 2. Widespread civil unrest and riots in Albania. 3. Widespread civil unrest and riots in Italy. 4. Widespread civil unrest and riots in Spain. 5. Widespread civil unrest and riots in Portugal. 6. Widespread civil unrest and riots in Belgium. 7. Widespread civil unrest and riots in Serbia. 8. Widespread civil unrest and riots in Georgia. 9. Widespread civil unrest and an apparent judicial coup in Poland. 10. Widespread civil unrest and riots in Czechia (including an attempted takeover of the Parliament building). 11. Widespread student protests in Greece. 12. Targeted student protests in Indonesia. 13. Localized violent protests in India. 14. An apparently fraudulent election in Brazil where the presumed presidential election winner was forced to flee the country under threat of arrest by his opponent. 15. The uncovering of a Color Revolution plot in the USA led by embittered former USAID employees and ex-military members. That’s a lot to be happening all at once, don’t you think? And the USA is having midterm elections next week. You know, if I was a conspiracy-minded type I might be connecting some dots here. 🧐
1
2
In just these past two weeks we have seen: 1. Widespread civil unrest and riots in France. 2. Widespread civil unrest and riots in Albania. 3. Widespread civil unrest and riots in Italy. 4. Widespread civil unrest and riots in Spain. 5. Widespread civil unrest and riots in Portugal. 6. Widespread civil unrest and riots in Belgium. 7. Widespread civil unrest and riots in Serbia. 8. Widespread civil unrest and riots in Georgia. 9. Widespread civil unrest and an apparent judicial coup in Poland. 10. Widespread civil unrest and riots in Czechia (including an attempted takeover of the Parliament building). 11. Widespread student protests in Greece. 12. Targeted student protests in Indonesia. 13. Localized violent protests in India. 14. An apparently fraudulent election in Brazil where the presumed presidential election winner was forced to flee the country under threat of arrest by his opponent. 15. The uncovering of a Color Revolution plot in the USA led by embittered former USAID employees and ex-military members. That’s a lot to be happening all at once, don’t you think? And the USA is having midterm elections next week. You know, if I was a conspiracy-minded type I might be connecting some dots here. 🧐
1,513
11,608
750
38,063
565,764
In just these past two weeks we have seen: 1. Widespread civil unrest and riots in France. 2. Widespread civil unrest and riots in Albania. 3. Widespread civil unrest and riots in Italy. 4. Widespread civil unrest and riots in Spain. 5. Widespread civil unrest and riots in Portugal. 6. Widespread civil unrest and riots in Belgium. 7. Widespread civil unrest and riots in Serbia. 8. Widespread civil unrest and riots in Georgia. 9. Widespread civil unrest and an apparent judicial coup in Poland. 10. Widespread civil unrest and riots in Czechia (including an attempted takeover of the Parliament building). 11. Widespread student protests in Greece. 12. Targeted student protests in Indonesia. 13. Localized violent protests in India. 14. An apparently fraudulent election in Brazil where the presumed presidential election winner was forced to flee the country under threat of arrest by his opponent. 15. The uncovering of a Color Revolution plot in the USA led by embittered former USAID employees and ex-military members. That’s a lot to be happening all at once, don’t you think? And the USA is having midterm elections next week. You know, if I was a conspiracy-minded type I might be connecting some dots here. 🧐
1
2
City Castles retweeted
Last holiday season, X saw 1.2B video views. Put your brand in the feed this year. Source: X Internal Data, US, Oct 1 to Jan 2.

16
33
228
314,065
FORMER FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY CHARGED UNDER THE ESPIONAGE ACT On October 5, 2026, the Justice Department filed a two-count "criminal information" charging former FBI Director James Comey with transmitting and conspiring to transmit national defense information against James Comey in federal court in Washington, D.C. Judge Trevor McFadden unsealed it on October 26, 2026. Count one is 18 U.S.C. § 793(d), transmitting national defense information to a person not entitled to receive it. Count two is § 793(g), conspiracy. Section 793 is the statute Jack Smith used on President Trump, who was completely innocent. In June 2023 Smith charged Trump in Fort Pierce, Florida, with 31 counts under § 793(e) for keeping his own papers in his own house. Judge Aileen Cannon threw the case out on July 15, 2024. President Trump was unfairly charged for keeping documents he had a right to keep. Comey is charged for handing a FISA court secret to the New York Times. The leak is dated October 5, 2016. On October 4, 2016, Reuters reported that Yahoo had scanned its customers’ email for the United States government. The next day Charlie Savage of the New York Times published the corrected version, citing two government officials: a FISA court order had required Yahoo to search for a signature used by a foreign terrorist organization. The prosecutors say Comey directed his staff to speak to Savage to correct Reuters, and that the correction was classified. They say the Times story tracked talking points emailed to about thirty officials less than four hours before it ran. Comey’s lawyers answer that the leak was “merely the talking points.” Both sides agree on one thing: the Times printed the government’s talking points. The "criminal information" does not name the staff. Comey’s own lawyers do. Their filings of October 16 and October 27, 2026, name James A. Baker, the FBI’s general counsel, as the man who spoke to the Times. John Durham identified Baker as a source in 2017. Baker’s account: Comey’s chief of staff, Jim Rybicki, told him to do it, and Baker understood the order came from Comey. The Department looked at this leak twice, in December 2018 and January 2020, with Baker’s account in the file, and closed it both times. Count two, the conspiracy count, reaches past Comey. A conspiracy is an agreement. The information says Comey acted “through one or more co-conspirators” to have Individual #1 disclose national defense information to a reporter. Individual #1 is Baker. The co-conspirators are the people between Comey and Baker: Rybicki, who carried the order, and the officials who drafted the talking points that afternoon. Baker has already told a court who else was in the agreement. Under oath at the Sussmann trial in May 2022, he said the Director of the FBI and the Director of National Intelligence authorized the disclosure. The Director of the FBI was Comey. The DNI was James Clapper. Three months later, on January 6, 2017, the same two men were in Trump Tower briefing President-elect Trump, and Comey stayed behind to tell him about the Steele dossier. Within four days the dossier was in the press. On September 19, 2016, Baker took the Alfa Bank material from Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann. Two weeks later Baker was handing the New York Times a FISA secret on the Director’s instruction. Three weeks after that, on October 21, 2016, Comey signed the FISA application on Carter Page, built on Christopher Steele’s fabrications. Christopher Wray’s FBI investigated Comey’s other leak to the New York Times, the April 22, 2017 article defending his handling of the Clinton email case, as ARCTIC HAZE from August 14, 2017. The file records that Comey had Daniel Richman hired as a special government employee with a Top Secret clearance so that Comey could discuss classified matters with someone outside the Bureau’s leadership, and used Richman as his liaison to the press. The team cut the suspect list to eight officials, mostly former FBI. All denied it. On June 29, 2021, Comey, through his lawyer, allowed the FBI a limited search of his own iPhone. On September 9, 2021, with Wray still Director and Merrick Garland as Attorney General, the Bureau closed the case without charges, noting that the Department does not as a rule prosecute officials who merely confirm secrets to reporters. On October 9, 2026, the government’s lawyer told Judge McFadden he had wanted to indict Comey that day and had booked the grand jury to do it. The Department agreed to wait thirty days. The thirty days end on November 8, 2026. One of the three prosecutors on the case, Justin Silverberg, comes from the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, the office running the Fort Pierce grand jury on the Grand Conspiracy. My book, The Grand Conspiracy, grandconspiracybook.com, has the whole cast: Comey, Baker, Clapper, Rybicki, and what the FBI was really doing in October 2016.
17
395
12
1,205
23,184
Comey, who is undeniably guilty, is charged under the same Espionage Act statute Jack Smith used against President Trump, who was entirely innocent. The charges reach beyond Comey: then-DNI Jim Clapper allegedly authorised his leaks of classified information to the media. And the Florida prosecutors investigating the Grand Conspiracy are involved in this case. Expect it to be rolled into the bigger conspiracy case.
FORMER FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY CHARGED UNDER THE ESPIONAGE ACT On October 5, 2026, the Justice Department filed a two-count "criminal information" charging former FBI Director James Comey with transmitting and conspiring to transmit national defense information against James Comey in federal court in Washington, D.C. Judge Trevor McFadden unsealed it on October 26, 2026. Count one is 18 U.S.C. § 793(d), transmitting national defense information to a person not entitled to receive it. Count two is § 793(g), conspiracy. Section 793 is the statute Jack Smith used on President Trump, who was completely innocent. In June 2023 Smith charged Trump in Fort Pierce, Florida, with 31 counts under § 793(e) for keeping his own papers in his own house. Judge Aileen Cannon threw the case out on July 15, 2024. President Trump was unfairly charged for keeping documents he had a right to keep. Comey is charged for handing a FISA court secret to the New York Times. The leak is dated October 5, 2016. On October 4, 2016, Reuters reported that Yahoo had scanned its customers’ email for the United States government. The next day Charlie Savage of the New York Times published the corrected version, citing two government officials: a FISA court order had required Yahoo to search for a signature used by a foreign terrorist organization. The prosecutors say Comey directed his staff to speak to Savage to correct Reuters, and that the correction was classified. They say the Times story tracked talking points emailed to about thirty officials less than four hours before it ran. Comey’s lawyers answer that the leak was “merely the talking points.” Both sides agree on one thing: the Times printed the government’s talking points. The "criminal information" does not name the staff. Comey’s own lawyers do. Their filings of October 16 and October 27, 2026, name James A. Baker, the FBI’s general counsel, as the man who spoke to the Times. John Durham identified Baker as a source in 2017. Baker’s account: Comey’s chief of staff, Jim Rybicki, told him to do it, and Baker understood the order came from Comey. The Department looked at this leak twice, in December 2018 and January 2020, with Baker’s account in the file, and closed it both times. Count two, the conspiracy count, reaches past Comey. A conspiracy is an agreement. The information says Comey acted “through one or more co-conspirators” to have Individual #1 disclose national defense information to a reporter. Individual #1 is Baker. The co-conspirators are the people between Comey and Baker: Rybicki, who carried the order, and the officials who drafted the talking points that afternoon. Baker has already told a court who else was in the agreement. Under oath at the Sussmann trial in May 2022, he said the Director of the FBI and the Director of National Intelligence authorized the disclosure. The Director of the FBI was Comey. The DNI was James Clapper. Three months later, on January 6, 2017, the same two men were in Trump Tower briefing President-elect Trump, and Comey stayed behind to tell him about the Steele dossier. Within four days the dossier was in the press. On September 19, 2016, Baker took the Alfa Bank material from Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann. Two weeks later Baker was handing the New York Times a FISA secret on the Director’s instruction. Three weeks after that, on October 21, 2016, Comey signed the FISA application on Carter Page, built on Christopher Steele’s fabrications. Christopher Wray’s FBI investigated Comey’s other leak to the New York Times, the April 22, 2017 article defending his handling of the Clinton email case, as ARCTIC HAZE from August 14, 2017. The file records that Comey had Daniel Richman hired as a special government employee with a Top Secret clearance so that Comey could discuss classified matters with someone outside the Bureau’s leadership, and used Richman as his liaison to the press. The team cut the suspect list to eight officials, mostly former FBI. All denied it. On June 29, 2021, Comey, through his lawyer, allowed the FBI a limited search of his own iPhone. On September 9, 2021, with Wray still Director and Merrick Garland as Attorney General, the Bureau closed the case without charges, noting that the Department does not as a rule prosecute officials who merely confirm secrets to reporters. On October 9, 2026, the government’s lawyer told Judge McFadden he had wanted to indict Comey that day and had booked the grand jury to do it. The Department agreed to wait thirty days. The thirty days end on November 8, 2026. One of the three prosecutors on the case, Justin Silverberg, comes from the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, the office running the Fort Pierce grand jury on the Grand Conspiracy. My book, The Grand Conspiracy, grandconspiracybook.com, has the whole cast: Comey, Baker, Clapper, Rybicki, and what the FBI was really doing in October 2016.
39
947
10
2,665
14,640
City Castles retweeted
This feels like a good time to remind everyone that Senator Slotkin (CIA plant) has been claiming for many months that Trump plans to do something like deploy DHS/ICE agents to polling stations, and/or declare a national emergency and invoke the Insurrection Act, as a means to secure/suspend the election. Slotkin has been extremely valuable to us, as she always gives us a glimpse into the enemy’s camp. She tells us everything. I’m not sure why some of you believe the Dems’ insurrection/coup is some sort of new development. Anons have been tracking the ongoing insurrection for 9 years now. I’ve been tracking and reporting on the Trump administration getting the pieces in place to invoke the Insurrection Act this entire term. The shadow war is just now reaching the surface for everyone to see.
288
2,584
96
7,683
122,319
City Castles retweeted
Replying to @DHSgov
Muslim police force driving cars similar to real police. A separate police force enforcing Sharia Law, is illegal and Mamdani should be arrested for civil rights violations against non-Muslims. This must be ended immediately.
1
1
America better wake up. Muslim leader in Plano, Texas with over a million followers is rallying Muslims to vote, saying this is the most important election in their lifetime for advancing Muslims in America Saying it’s their “religious duty” to vote for candidates that support Muslims “Brothers and sisters in America, subhanAllah, we are undergoing perhaps the most important election season, perhaps of our entire lifetimes. And it is imperative that we as Muslims of this country, as American Muslims, we avail ourselves to the same rights, the same privileges, the same sense of civic engagement and civic duty as everybody else. Dare I say even more so in light of what is happening in the world, in light of the politicization of anti-Muslim bigotry. Muslims of America, you need to vote for candidates that represent your interests and our interests — Candidates that are upholding the values that we all hold dear. The freedom to worship our Lord, the freedom to practice our faith in every state, and especially in the battle states of Texas and Michigan” “It is our ethic duty, it is our civic duty, it is our religious duty to go and support those candidates and choose those that represent the best of our interests — we choose those that are clearly going to be beneficial to this country, to our country, to the entirety of the world. As Muslims — It is our duty to get involved and to choose those people that will be better for our lands and for the globe. And so today, tomorrow, pray Jumu'ah and go do vote for the Ummah. JazakAllahu khairan. Assalamu alaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh. JazakAllahu khairan”
763
1,995
252
2,590
79,145
City Castles retweeted
A white Jewish female voting for a Muslim Jihadist in Michigan because they share the same values is literally the same thing as Chicken's voting for Colonel Sanders Further proof that liberalism is a mental disorder!
2,081
3,100
328
10,243
101,872
City Castles retweeted
La déconstruction prétendait jeter l’eau du bain coloniale, elle a fini par noyer le bébé, et le bébé c’était la civilisation qui avait inventé la baignoire, le savon, et l’idée même qu’on puisse laver quoi que ce soit. Derrida voulait nous apprendre à lire entre les lignes, ses héritiers ont juste appris à brûler le livre. Foucault traquait les rapports de pouvoir, ils en ont fait une grille à appliquer mécaniquement sur tout ce qui dépasse. Et au bout de la chaîne, on se retrouve à défendre par relativisme culturel les régimes les plus anti-femmes, anti-presse, anti-juifs, anti-gays de la planète, au nom de la lutte contre l’oppression. Le pire, c’est que la déconstruction était au départ un outil critique puissant. Mais transformée en idéologie de masse via les départements de sciences sociales américains, elle est devenue ce qu’elle prétendait combattre : un dogme ethnocentré (universitaire occidental moyen) qui s’ignore, projetant ses catégories morales sur des civilisations qui s’en moquent et qui, elles, n’ont aucun complexe à défendre les leurs. La civilisation occidentale est la seule de l’histoire à avoir produit la critique de soi comme valeur cardinale. C’est sa force et c’est devenu son talon d’Achille : face à des adversaires qui ne pratiquent pas ce sport, l’asymétrie est mortelle.
12
93
1
678
266,537
City Castles retweeted
Je veux présenter mes excuses, au nom des Français, pour avoir enfanté la French Theory (qui a enfanté la pire des merdes idéologiques : le wokisme). Nous avons donné au monde Descartes, Pascal, Tocqueville. Et puis, dans les ruines intellectuelles de l'après-68, nous avons donné Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze. Trois hommes brillants qui ont fabriqué, dans l'élégance de notre langue, l'arme idéologique qui paralyse aujourd'hui l'Occident. Il faut comprendre ce qu'ils ont fait. Foucault a enseigné que la vérité n'existe pas, qu'il n'y a que des rapports de pouvoir déguisés en savoir. Que la science, la raison, la justice, l'institution médicale, l'école, la prison, la sexualité, tout n'est qu'une mise en scène de la domination. Derrida a enseigné que les textes n'ont pas de sens stable, que tout signifiant glisse, que toute lecture est une trahison, que l'auteur est mort et que le lecteur règne. Deleuze a enseigné qu'il fallait préférer le rhizome à l'arbre, le nomade au sédentaire, le désir à la loi, le devenir à l'être, la différence à l'identité. Pris isolément, ce sont des thèses discutables. Combinées, exportées, vulgarisées, elles forment un système. Et ce système est un poison. Car voici ce qui s'est passé. Ces textes, illisibles en France, ont traversé l'Atlantique. Les départements de Yale, de Berkeley, de Columbia les ont absorbés dans les années 80. Ils y ont trouvé un terreau qui n'existait pas chez nous : le puritanisme américain, sa culpabilité raciale, son obsession identitaire. La French Theory s'est mariée à ce substrat, et l'enfant de ce mariage s'appelle le wokisme. Judith Butler lit Foucault et invente le genre performatif. Edward Said lit Foucault et invente le post-colonialisme académique. Kimberlé Crenshaw hérite du cadre et invente l'intersectionnalité. À chaque étape, la matrice est française : il n'y a pas de vérité, il n'y a que du pouvoir, donc toute hiérarchie est suspecte, toute institution est oppressive, toute norme est violence, toute identité est construite donc négociable, toute majorité est coupable. Voilà comment trois philosophes parisiens, qui n'ont probablement jamais imaginé leurs conséquences pratiques, ont fourni le logiciel d'exploitation à une génération entière d'activistes, de bureaucrates universitaires, de DRH, de journalistes, de législateurs. Voilà comment on a obtenu une civilisation qui ne sait plus dire si une femme est une femme, si sa propre histoire mérite d'être défendue, si le mérite existe, si la vérité se distingue de l'opinion. C'est de la merde pour une raison simple, et il faut la dire calmement. Une civilisation se tient debout sur trois piliers : la croyance qu'il existe une vérité accessible à la raison, la croyance qu'il existe un bien distinct du mal, la croyance qu'il existe un héritage à transmettre. La French Theory a entrepris de dynamiter les trois. Pas par méchanceté. Par jeu intellectuel, par fascination du soupçon, par haine de la bourgeoisie qui les avait nourris. Mais le résultat est là. Une génération entière a appris à déconstruire et n'a jamais appris à construire. Une génération entière sait soupçonner et ne sait plus admirer. Une génération entière voit le pouvoir partout et la beauté nulle part. Je m'excuse parce que nous, Français, avons une responsabilité particulière. C'est notre langue, nos universités, nos éditeurs, notre prestige qui ont donné à ce nihilisme son emballage chic. Sans la légitimité de la Sorbonne et de Vincennes, ces idées n'auraient jamais traversé l'océan. Nous avons exporté le doute comme d'autres exportent des armes. Ce qui se construit maintenant, en silicon valley, dans les labos d'IA, dans les startups, dans les ateliers, dans tous les lieux où des gens fabriquent encore des choses au lieu de les déconstruire, c'est la réponse. Une civilisation se reconstruit par les bâtisseurs, pas par les commentateurs. Par ceux qui croient que la vérité existe et qu'elle vaut qu'on s'y consacre. Par ceux qui assument une hiérarchie du beau, du vrai, du bon, et qui n'ont pas honte de la transmettre. Alors pardon. Et au travail.
4,477
23,801
3,380
79,080
57,611,587
Obama era CIA asset turned politician Senator Elissa Slotkin gets caught on a hidden camera explaining the communist democrats’ planned lawfare attacks if they are able to cheat their way into power. You can take the girl out of the CIA, but you can’t take the CIA out of the girl.
86
684
43
870
6,856
City Castles retweeted
Text your friends in Texas and make sure they vote on Election Day
#TexasSenate NYT: James Talarico’s internals are within the margin of error. Some recent public surveys show Talarico either tied with Paxton or within the margin of error with a 2-point lead. The candidate’s internal polls match those tighter surveys, people close to Talarico said, and may not be fully capturing the sentiments of rural conservative voters who support Trump. Link to article: nytimes.com/2026/10/31/us/po…
109
224
6
1,515
354,452