Pinned Tweet
$LINK How I turned $10K into $200K on $CWD and rotated those profits into my $LINK stack . A quick breakdown of one of the best trades I’ve prob ever made not in terms of dollar amount BUT entry/exit and overall execution.
1). $CWD announced they were becoming the first Chainlink treasury on aug 28th. I bought the news on that day, then sold quickly when it broke my SL.
2). I kept watching it. For several days it consolidated and flattend out in the low 2 dollar range. Market cap was only like $1.5M. Nobody cared. Zero attention.
3). Here’s what I noticed: $OCTO announced a treasury purchase, and with a tiny market cap, it instantly repriced from $1 to $80 on the same day. This further reinforced my thesis of market cap repricing and that the same thing can happen to $CWD once they announce it.
4). $CWD said they planned to buy LINK but hadn’t actually announced the actual purchase yet. That was the catalyst.
5). At $2.16, I loaded 5,000 shares. If they announced, the market would have to reprice. With that tiny float, I knew it could go parabolic.
5). Literally The next day, they announced. Price ripped from $2.15 to $56. Market cap repriced, just like I expected. Now this was wild in terms of it happening the day after $OCTO lol but this was my expectation of what could happen and it happened. I literally woke up squinting my eyes at the price LMAO.
I scaled out into strength, sold in tranches at $30, $40, $50. Locked in about $200,000 profit from a $10k entry. (see Screenshots). The only reason I sold so quickly and 80% of my position is that they announced they purchased Chainlink but they didnt say how much which could cause volatility because of uncertainty.
That profit rotated into $LINK. One disciplined asymmetric bet added almost 10,000 extra $LINK to my stack.
The lesson here is the market is full of opportunities hiding in plain sight. Most people ignore them, get distracted by noise, or don’t do the homework. If you stay focused, disciplined, and obsessive about the details, you’ll see things others miss.
This was a case of preparation, intuition, positioning meets opportunity and luck (Luck is always a factor ).
ClairHawk_Capital retweeted
NEW: LG CNS, the technology arm of LG Group, enters a strategic partnership with Chainlink to advance Korea’s $68B digital asset market.
LG Group is one of Korea’s largest business groups, with approximately ₩186 trillion in assets across 63 affiliates. LG CNS is the lead contractor for the Bank of Korea’s flagship digital currency initiative, Project Hangang.
Through the partnership, LG CNS and Chainlink will:
• Enhance LG CNS’s digital asset platform solution with Chainlink’s cross-chain, data, and orchestration infrastructure
• Collaborate on digital asset solutions for Korean institutions using the full Chainlink platform
• Advance the next generation of technical standards underpinning Korea’s digital asset economy
The partnership is built for one of the world’s most active and technologically advanced digital asset markets. Korea is Asia's second-largest digital asset market, with the Korean won consistently ranking second in crypto trading volume, behind only the U.S. dollar.
By combining LG CNS’s institutional expertise with Chainlink technology standards, the partnership establishes the foundation for compliant digital asset infrastructure in Korea and for global expansion.
ClairHawk_Capital retweeted
Very excited about the Link:NYC conference next week in New York. Excited to be bringing together the top TradFi and DeFi teams and their senior leaders to discuss the future of the new global financial system.
chain.link/events/linknyc
ClairHawk_Capital retweeted
Appreciate the acknowledgment, but to clarify, we do not view link as a grift. We are a regulated financial institution, and just provide fair and balanced coverage. That means acknowledging potential risks. This is a similar risk shared by many cryptocurrencies because fundamentally they are not equities and not entitled to protocol cash flows. That said, increased adoption of chainlink would potentially result in more demand for link. For now, demand likely grows in-line with broader crypto activity (Defi/ lending / etc) but as more finance moved on chain, it’s TAM could expand massively
ClairHawk_Capital retweeted
Following an extensive security review, @kamino found Chainlink CCIP provides the secure-by-default architecture required to underwrite cross-chain collateral risk.
Assets secured by CCIP qualify for higher borrowing limits & LTV ratios.
ClairHawk_Capital retweeted
It's crazy how we have seen the exact same playbook with DTCC and Securrency👀:
@The_DTCC acquires Securrency then plugs in @chainlink for the collateral appchain
@SPGlobal acquire @OpenZeppelin and embeds chainlink into dev tools.
Tradfi giants aren't reinventing the wheel. They buy the industry-standard, and use @chainlink as the connective tissue to drive institutional adoption at scale.
Wondering if this will play out again in the future?👀
Today we’re announcing a strategic partnership with @chainlink
Chainlink CCIP and ACE are now natively embedded across OpenZeppelin tooling, giving institutions and developers one trusted foundation for moving assets and operations onchain.
ClairHawk_Capital retweeted
DTCC Tokenization Service Will Go Live on October 28th.
One day before $LINK:NYC where the CEO of the DTCC will speak👀
All eyes on the 29th of October 👀
$Link Hmmm a day before LINK NYC 🤔maybe...nah...well..nah..
teapawt.net/The_DTCC/status/211114…
teapawt.net/SMQKEDQG/status/211134…
ethereum:0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca This is a really good visual comparison. Very few get it.
Biggest assymetric opportunity in the history of capital markets.
ClairHawk_Capital retweeted
🚨 CHAINLINK IS THE NEXT NVIDIA?! LINK COULD BE READY TO EXPLODE
Nobody is better positioned to capitalize on Institutional money like Chainlink. The data doesn't lie and the charts tell the same story. Big breakout, coming!
👇YouTube Video Link Below👇
ClairHawk_Capital retweeted
#Chainlink YouTube video dropping in a few hours!
Going to cover this fractal, the BTC and ETH pairs, and break down the fundamental drivers that will cause insane growth/adoption over the next few years
Notifications on. This will be a good one 🫡🚀
Every time I look at the #Chainlink chart I get so excited because it looks just like $NVDA before it broke out
$LINK is by far one of the most important tokens in the market and I think most people are overlooking it
I refuse. Link is going to hundreds of Dollars, per token
ClairHawk_Capital retweeted
BREAKING: Pacific Meta partners with Chainlink to unlock institutional tokenization in Japan, adopting CCIP as its interoperability solution and listing the Automated Compliance Engine on its marketplace.
LINK is up 13.4% over 30 days.
@chainlink
ClairHawk_Capital retweeted
With ample patience, you can see a generational rally on this asset.
One of the more hated assets in the market. A bit confusing to me at first glance -- but, when you understand the 6-7 years sideways accumulation range and all the disillusionment in the industry since the COVID bubble, it makes more sense.
Trillions of $$$ of tokenized assets are coming onchain.
Chainlink is waiting for them.
ethereum:0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca
ClairHawk_Capital retweeted
Every time I look at the #Chainlink chart I get so excited because it looks just like $NVDA before it broke out
$LINK is by far one of the most important tokens in the market and I think most people are overlooking it
I refuse. Link is going to hundreds of Dollars, per token
ClairHawk_Capital retweeted
Catfishy’s post exposes crypto’s biggest delusion: thinking one blockchain (Ethereum, Solana, Avalanche, or a bank's private subnet) will become the single "Unified Ledger" housing all global finance.
Instead of eliminating database silos, we’ve just built blockchain silos:
➡️Swift, DTCC, and Euroclear are building their own appchains.
➡️Banks run private subnets for compliance.
➡️L1s and L2s fragment liquidity across trading, perps, and RWAs.
Think about how the internet actually evolved:
➡️ Blockchains = Web Servers. (Localhost, AWS, or private enterprise servers optimized for specific tasks)
➡️ The "Unified Ledger" Myth = Trying to host the entire world's software on a single server.
The internet didn't win by convincing Google, Amazon, and JPMorgan to run on one mega-computer.
It won when TCP/IP and HTTP connected millions of independent servers into a single, seamless user experience.
The goal of tokenization isn't to force $4 quadrillion onto one chain. It’s real-time orchestration, automated compliance, and atomic settlement between every chain and legacy database.
The protocol that connects this fragmented web won't be another L1 trying to rule them all. It will be the orchestration layer acting as the TCP/IP of global finance.
And it's called Chainlink CRE
>At their core, blockchains give us a way to take financial activity spread across different databases around the world and unify it in real time under shared rules. The opportunity is to bring the siloed databases of exchanges, banks, and other financial institutions into one shared database, with the blockchain acting as a common API. Assets, collateral, and applications can then operate within the same system.
>The two big questions are who houses this activity and how large it can become. I’ll save the first for another day, but the second is where I think people are dramatically underestimating the opportunity.
It's actually unbelievable that people are still writing a thesis around a blockchain (the one they'd prefer, of course) serving as a "unified ledger" that connects these disparate systems in 2026.
What's actually happening is that "financial activity spread across different databases around the world" is *STILL* being spread across different siloed databases around the world, except, those siloed, databases are now peer-hosted and they're called...a blockchain.
Consider:
Ethereum thinks of itself as the "global settlement layer" because it has the most TVL.
Solana calls itself "Internet Capital Markets" because it has the most spot trading volume of any chain.
Hyperliquid calls itself the "chain to house all of finance" because it has the most open interest among perp DEXes.
XRPL calls itself the "Internet of Value" because it has a cult that can't look up data on DeFiLlama.
LayerZero (ZERO) is launching a high performance chain and it will have Citadel (supposedly) trading on it.
Broadridge's Distributed Ledger Repo (DLR) platform—which runs on the Canton Network—processes over $359 billion in average daily repo transactions and more than $7.5 trillion in monthly repo volume
Avalanche calls itself the blockchain "built for institutions" because it hosts Goldman Sachs' $100B Treasury fund and Progmat's $3B securities book, on its private subnets.
DTCC, which settles $4 quadrillion per year for all US capital markets, is launching their own chain (DTCC Collateral Appchain) in Q1 2027, along with a multichain tokenization service.
SWIFT, which moves the world's GDP every three days, is launching its own chain for its 11,000+ member banks for cross-border payments, which can also evolve into supporting securities, too.
Euroclear (36.8 trillion Euros worth of assets under custody), which is the DTCC of Europe, says that they need to have a **MINIMUM** of one chain for each asset class and that they can't even share a ledger with non-EU citizens/entities.
Countless more banks (JPM, Wells Fargo, etc) and institutions are launching (or already using) their own private, permissioned chains. Even the BIS, which originally coined the vision and term of the "Unified Ledger", conceded that a single shared ledger to host the world's activity will not happen.
The goal of tokenization (or onchain finance or Internet Capital Markets) is to have a consistent state across all chains with real-time data orchestration, automated compliance and atomic DvP/ PvP transactions, enabling T+0 settlement, 24x7 open markets, and regulatory monitoring.
I'll let you decide which protocol will come closest to
"bringing together the siloed databases of exchanges, banks, and other financial institutions into one shared system, so that assets, collateral, and applications can then operate within the same system", but you can take it to the bank that it won't be a blockchain.
ethereum:0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca is EVERYWERE. YOU DO NOT understand what is coming. The repricing once market catches will be violent. Triple digits is FUD
1/
@Fidelity just had a patent granted for putting your résumé onchain.
Follow-up to the filing I broke down in February. It cleared today.
Degrees, licenses, certs as tokens. Revoked on fraud. Verified by anyone. The oracle in the spec? $LINK
teapawt.net/arcamids/status/202191…
ClairHawk_Capital retweeted
🚨 US $LINK ETFS JUST HAD THEIR 2ND-BIGGEST DAY EVER 🚨
$9.48M in on Oct 9, all into Grayscale's GLNK.
$178.44M net inflows since launch. LIVE money, not a roadmap.
And the float keeps tightening:
→ ~17M $LINK held by US ETFs
→ 6.20M in the Reserve, still buying
→ 42.52M staked
= ~66M locked (8.6% of circulating)
Bull Math still stands 👇
Bull → $208
Super-bull → $1,982
Endgame → $13,461
#Chainlink
ClairHawk_Capital retweeted
What I’m getting from what the @The_DTCC is saying is, assets can originate on different blockchains, collateral can be mobilized across different custody systems, Institutions can coordinate transactions through interoperability infrastructure, settlement assets can potentially be tokenized deposits, stablecoins, or other eligible assets.
So you mean to tell me a bank could potentially mobilize tokenized Treasury collateral on Canton, coordinate the transaction using Chainlink, and settle using tokenized commercial bank money?
I am not even going to say it.
"Any asset, […] any jurisdiction, with any custodial system, any time of day is now mobile in terms of collateral. This truly changes the game.”
- Dan Doney, CTO of @The_DTCC