Coalition for Fair Software Licensing (@CoalitionForFSL) header
Coalition for Fair Software Licensing (@CoalitionForFSL) profile picture

A coalition of North American organizations experiencing restrictive software licensing practices.

Joined October 2021
Photo by Coalition for Fair Software Licensing (@CoalitionForFSL)Photo by Coalition for Fair Software Licensing (@CoalitionForFSL)Photo by Coalition for Fair Software Licensing (@CoalitionForFSL)Photo by Coalition for Fair Software Licensing (@CoalitionForFSL)Photo by Coalition for Fair Software Licensing (@CoalitionForFSL)Photo by Coalition for Fair Software Licensing (@CoalitionForFSL)Photo by Coalition for Fair Software Licensing (@CoalitionForFSL)Photo by Coalition for Fair Software Licensing (@CoalitionForFSL)Photo by Coalition for Fair Software Licensing (@CoalitionForFSL)Photo by Coalition for Fair Software Licensing (@CoalitionForFSL)
The CMA's proposed decision validates what customers across the UK have been telling us for years: Microsoft's restrictive software licensing practices are raising costs, limiting choice, and making it harder for organizations to adopt the technology that best serves their needs.
1
67
A practice that has long plagued enterprise customers now hits consumers directly: "The only entity winning in this situation is Microsoft because it knows that it's hard for many like myself now to pull the trigger and switch their cloud storage and Office ecosystem entirely."
46
Fair software licensing concerns are evolving with AI. As Microsoft rolls out its Copilot "super app," the question is clear: will customers have real freedom to choose third-party AI tools, or face penalties for doing so?
1
58
Broadcom’s licensing changes are part of a growing trend of software providers rewriting the terms for existing customers — squeezing budgets and eliminating real choice. It's time for enforceable standards that protect customers.
1
82
THIS is the impact of restrictive software licensing. When customers are locked in with no choice, prices can be raised "at will," and the customer is left holding the bag.
84
The architecture of anticompetitive licensing lock-in: Legacy dominance → discriminatory licensing → infrastructure gravity → forced bundling . The cycle locks enterprises in and shuts competitors out. Regulators have an opportunity to act before more customers are harmed.
76
Too new? Try too restrictive. Our research shows workers know exactly what E7 is: a lock-in play. Employers don't want forced, costly AI that harms competition. Procurement should be driven by innovation, capability, and price, not by coercion.
60