Replying to @Gracie_Blue89
90's 2000 were very very different.
16 & 17 year olds were topless on page 3.
Pop magazines were full of suggestive images of anyone younger.
It's bonkers to look back on but I'm not sure judging what was normal then through todays eyes is fair. Canceling someone was foreign
4
1
433
tbf, I've never seen one that works anything close to mildly reliable. I've defended Alex with this multiple times using their own tests back at them. They're pure slop.
Last time someone used the tool on the right to 'prove' her picture was fake. The same tool passed the first image I generated. I've tried many. They're pointless.
Real pictures or fake pictures the answers might as well be random.
12
Replying to @ABridgen
Your mind might well be independent, but did you consider stupid too?
This is either bait, or you're a moron.
Do you understand that we can go on any flight tracker and watch the entire history of this planes movements.
Every one of your points is stupid here.
5
637
Replying to @TheJadeWarwick
Come on. I like you but this is silly.
What do you expect to be left of a tin can hitting the ground in a nose dive.
It's a plane, with a transponder. Tracked the whole time.
The NFV was long past. Many other planes flew over
118
Hawkstone advent calendar just turned up! Can't wait for December now! π₯³
Looks brilliant! Good job @RealHawkstone @RealHawkstone π»
53
Paris "School children" protests.
#17octobre #emeutes
Jimmy Carr
2
57
Replying to @AdrianRamsay
The lies MP's spew should be treated as the national scandal it is.
You should all be in jail, either for your gross incompetence or your wilful misleading of the public.
ONS:
I think you might enjoy this if it's not on your radar.
youtube.com/watch?v=YdZ9MxtPβ¦
1
1
8
But this is what you really should watch.
Poor a fresh cup and enjoy.
youtube.com/watch?v=YdZ9MxtPβ¦
5
Sure, its possible. Or the opposite is possible.
That's why splitting and doing both is the best hedge.
Just as a fun question:
1 option give you 1m back.
The other, potentially:
90
Replying to @ColRFX @Saskiaaa_____
Overall in 20 years your stuff is safer.
You are not.
Fascinating thanks for triggering this rabbit whole and hour of procrastination
1
2
20
Replying to @ColRFX @Saskiaaa_____
But now ask... what the hell happened in 2016
The same data set has some interesting information
Replying to @Saskiaaa_____
I guess they were getting easy to steal... and then better tech came in. Now the rise is a tech catchup - people getting wider access to key cloners, obd port bypass systems etc. I think that the security features were working on a lag from criminals π€·ββοΈ This 1 is interesting
1
3
25



















