Yeah a different God than your sexless immaterial invisible tri personed substance that was invented by men in the 4th century. In other words the God of the Bible.
Actually we do it’s called the Book of Mormon and the gentiles are you being serious? Go and read 3 Nephi 15 and learn what Jesus meant when he said what he said in John 10
Here’s one of the many verses “Satan” told Joseph to write,
“And moreover, I say unto you, that there shall be no other name given nor any other way nor means whereby salvation can come unto the children of men, only in and through the name of Christ, the Lord Omnipotent.”
The only reason people worship the Trinity today is because of cultural hegemony. Not a single author of any book of the Bible demonstrates or teaches that they believe in a tripersoned substance. Man’s creation of the triune idol is satans biggest W
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
In John turners biography of Joseph smith— he’s not lds— he debunks this. Maybe you should learn how to read. But I’m certain you’d prefer to remain wilfully ignorant.
Joseph Smith was tarred and feathered for inappropriate behavior towards a minor. He was a criminal who was arrested forty times. He bribed judges and intimidated government officials. He practiced folk magic and divination. He sacrificed dogs. He created the Book of Mormon as a hoax with the help of his friends and family. He defrauded many people out of their life savings with illegal banking practices. He fled from justice out of New York, Ohio, and Missouri.
He was a narcissist who lied incessantly. He committed adultery too many times to count. He was arrested for treason, smuggled a pepperbox pistol into Carthage Jail, and subsequently died rather unceremoniously in a shootout. He was most definitely a conman and reaped what he sowed in life.
Fixed it for you.
Mark must feel comfortable in his soft padded room too scared to talk to literally anyone
You can’t blaspheme against something that doesn’t exist and was just made up hundreds of years after the apostles
The angel Nephi reference didn’t show up until 1839 by James mulholland in a JS history manuscript and it was copied and printed in the times and seasons before it was corrected. Every early reference was always moroni.
Keep beating your chest after posting ignorant slop though
Did Joseph Smith forget the angel's name?
Early official LDS histories and the 1842 "Times and Seasons" straight-up called the angel who gave Joseph the golden plates "Nephi"—not Moroni.
Later Mormons quietly changed it and blamed a "scribal error."
If this foundational visitation story can't keep the messenger's name straight across retellings, how reliable is the rest of it?
Details matter. The Bible warns us to test the spirits for a reason.
When an apostle who was given the keys of the kingdom dies and there’s no record that that apostle passed those keys to anyone, and there’s no record that any apostle ever set a bishop apart to become an apostle or replace an apostle when the apostles died that’s damning evidence
Have any Calvinists ever found support for their triune idol from anywhere other than the 4th century? You’d think scripture would be their main source not a commentary a generation after the nicean creed 300 years after Christ.
Jesus and his apostles didn’t teach the Trinity
Critiquing LDS apologists for dodging honest dialogue while personally refusing every conversation request because… insert ad hominem… is the Calvinist way. You are a hypocrite.
The key to LDS apologetics:
Redefine everything.
Ad hom your opponents.
Then act like you did something cool.
Lets get back to good charitable loving discussions.
1
5
221
From what I’ve learned today on X Jordan is only comfortable talking to 18 year olds. His Gods will isn’t for him to go onto @ThoughtfulSaint or @Lets_Talk_HC where he could actually reach a lot of people with his gods message.
From what ive learned on X today:
LDS missionaries can proselytize me at the store while im minding my own business but im not allowed to proselytize them.
Whats going on with the double standards here?
2
31
1,304
Even if we grant what you are saying this is a false equivalency. You reject modern revelation which means everything you believe must be found in the Bible.
The triune god ain’t there. You’d have to adopt our position of modern revelation to accept the trinity.
Please learn what the difference between the original manuscript and the printers manuscript are 🤦🏼♂️
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
Only 16% of self proclaimed Christians believe in the trinity. Makes sense. More and more people are abandoning the 1700 year old man made creedal god.
web.arizonachristian.edu/CRC…
4
119













