Content of Media

Solution there, it seems to me, is to create media that cannot become the message.

The most important arguments are the ones that go without saying. That you can simply assume your interlocutor is already convinced by

Reading the article one level up, not to be convinced by its arguments, but to observe that this is how the community it comes from argues

Did I, in fact, say that with my whole face hanging out, or are you just rounding off to the most convenient strawman of an enemy?

I believe that you believe what you are saying. I just think you're wrong

This is a limited scope analogy suitable as an intuition pump only

Kicked out of the Hero's Party for Being a Deranged Psychopath

Death of the Author, but it was premeditated murder

A conversation where mentioning that it contains spoilers for a work is itself a spoiler for the work

No, and also: fuck you

A doctor's prescription for a high paying low effort job

A treatise on the nature of power

We're not even arguing yet! We're still trying to understand each other's statements at a level of detail where we can evaluate if we agree or disagree!

Invited to join the inner circle of the imposter syndrome society. I hope they don't discover that I've been faking it all along.

A truly cursed gulf of understanding, where every attempt to explain brings your interlocutor further away from your understanding, and where every attempt to confirm produces a worse ball of twisted gibberish

A behavior that is not fundamentally wrong, but it's statistically likely that people looking for opportunities to do it are bad actors.