ONE MILLION VIEWS! 🤯

Q4 of midterm years is historically the strongest cycle during a given presidency 4 year cycle. Since 1950, the S&P has averaged a +6.6% gain in the fourth quarter, meaning October-December of midterm election years. This is about double the average 3.4% gain that we typically see in Q4 of non-midterm years. Moreover, the market has finished positive in 16 of 19 midterm fourth quarters since 1950! Right now, there is a lot of fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD) in the market. The relief rally that typically comes is due to more certainty after election results are finalized and plans become more clear. Volatility, like we are experiencing now almost always precedes this relief rally. The Q4 bottom of midterm years occurs in October nearly 60% of the time. From this October low, the median rally is often upwards of 10% by end of year. The key takeaway is that political clarity often acts as an upwards catalyst. I encourage all of you who have seen the market trade sideways and down lately to remember these trends! Are you going to panic sell or take advantage of this historical data? (Not financial advice) Let me know what you think and comment below!

Was just celebrating 500 followers last night. You guys are awesome. Thank you again and again 🙌🏻

I’ve always been a $MSTR guy but I’m slowly becoming a bigger and bigger $ASST guy due to what they’re doing. I’m excited for this company.

This was the 3rd weekend of “I’ll buy $1 of bitcoin for every like.” The first week we bought $3, second week $7 and this week $10. Pretty dang weak showing and we’ll continue it next week, but as promised…

Want to see a magic trick? This one’s called “compound interest”. Starting at $0 let’s calculate what it would mean if you could start putting a reasonable amount of money each month into the stock market. We will assume a 7% annual return to account for inflation. Scenario 1: you’re 20 years old and can afford to put away $200/month into the S&P. Without ever increasing your contribution you end up with $685,798.35 after 45 years. Only $108,000 of that is your contribution, the rest is compounded interest! Scenario 2: you’re 25 years old, just got a full time job recently and you’re able to put $500/month into the stock market. By the standard retirement age of 65, you’d have $1,197,810.67. That’s all it takes to become a millionaire these days. $500 a month. Scenario 3: you are 40 years old reading this. Haven’t started saving/investing for retirement. To reach the same level that the 25 year old has in scenario 2, you’d have to put $1575/month away to reach $1,195,406.81. What’s the lesson here? Time is your greatest financial (and overall) asset. Start now! Comment below what you think is the most important financial lesson you’ve learned! (None of this is financial advice)

We should get sent some X money for ad revenue on our posts. Just an idea.

Watching $ASST and $MSTR just tank this morning

Good morning people! So after the enormous day yesterday, here’s what it resulted in. 475k impressions turned into only 60k verified and then I went from about 17k to 57k verified home impressions on my bar towards the content creation monetization.

What are peoples strategies for buying stocks around earnings? Do you lay off or buy heavy? Earnings have never made a lot of sense to me unless it’s obvious.

THANK YOU ALL YOU BEAUTIFUL PEOPLE FOR THE SUPPORT YOU’VE GIVEN ME. I will continue to follow back, comment, post, support and build genuine relationships here. Appreciate you all so much. 500 ‼️

Preparing for another week of battling this market.

Umm guys…is this what we call “going viral” holy 💩 how many of those impressions do we think are verified?!? I couldn’t reply quick enough. All with under 500 followers 👀

The Packers frustrate me so much. This game has been infuriating

GO PACK GO

Taking social security at 62, 67 or 70? Let’s break it down with these numbers. 62 - $1800/month 67 - $2400/month 70 - $3000/month The difference between taking the money at 67 instead of 62 means you miss 5 years of $21,600/yr which comes out to $108,000. By waiting until 67, you only get an additional $7,200 per year. Take that $108,000 divided by $7200 and you get 15. This means it’d take 15 years to break even, putting you at age 82. Let’s say you wait until 70 for the maximum benefit. The same math we worked above comes out to 12. Meaning it would take 12 years to break even, putting you at age 82. So here’s my question and why I think the answer is so clear and obvious… Would you rather have money at 62 or 82? Comment below and let me know!

Good morning ☀️ everyone! I have some exciting family time/photos this morning and then watching football ALL day! What do you guys have planned today?

BREWERS! What a comeback!