Pinned Tweet
There once was a girl
And she liked to climb trees.
She had dirt in her hair,
And blood on her knees.
Had no pink in her cupboard,
Didn’t like the right toys,
So they cut off her hair
And they called her a boy.
She fell into depression.
They tried to be kinder;
To help her fit in:
Crushed her breasts in a binder.
But it wasn’t enough
She felt awkward and weird,
So they pumped her with drugs
And they grew her a beard.
She couldn’t stand dresses,
She refused to wear bras,
So they cut off her breasts,
Celebrated her scars.
They stripped flesh off her arm
Made a fat tube of skin,
Sewed it onto her crotch,
And said: “Now you’re a him!”
He looked like a man,
But squeaky and little,
His hair falling out,
And his bones frail and brittle.
He suffered through menopause,
Atrophy, bleeding,
His new penis was limp
And lacked any feeling.
His parents agreed,
He would never give birth,
So they cut out his ovaries,
To spite all the TERFs.
He grew sadder, and sadder,
But could not find the answer,
His heartbeat grew weak,
And the drugs gave him cancer.
When crying one night,
His whole head in a whirl,
His mum asked: “what’s wrong?”
She said: “Mum, I’m a girl.”
Sam Morgan retweeted
🎯 💯
#RESIST ✊🤨
Sam Morgan retweeted
Trans🏳️⚧️phobic❌ people are safe with me 🥰
Trans🏳️⚧️phobic❌ people are safe with me 🥰
Trans🏳️⚧️phobic❌ people are safe with me 🥰
Trans🏳️⚧️phobic❌ people are safe with me 🥰
Trans🏳️⚧️phobic❌ people are safe with me 🥰
Trans🏳️⚧️phobic❌ people are safe with me 🥰
Sam Morgan retweeted
Hannah Barnes
"I was investigated by the NHS, called a transphobe and thought of suicide
Sarah Redver’s concerns about a trans children’s doctor became an ordeal that’s fuelling calls for an inquiry — Hilary Cass says the case ‘dwarfs’ Tavistock"
Times
archive.today/KYinq
Sam Morgan retweeted
I was reading this article and thinking "this is really good, does an amazing job of explaining a complex situation without being confusing" - and then saw the byline and realised why. Hannah is a national treasure.
🚨Hilary Cass has called for an independent inquiry into how Brighton GPs were allowed to prescribe cross-sex hormones to children as young as 12.“There urgently needs to be an investigation of why every system that should have protected children, young people, and indeed young adults has failed,” she told me.
The employment tribunal between Dr Sarah Redvers and NHS Sussex has highlighted how regulators and the NHS collectively failed to stop prescribing of puberty blockers and hormones against national guidelines - for years - and how instead the person raising concerns was accused of transphobia and herself investigated.
Dr Redvers sat down with me for her only newspaper interview about her treatment in a scandal which, Cass now says, “dwarfs” that of the Tavistock’s GIDS.
Me for the Sunday Times…
thetimes.com/article/cfde7b4…
Sam Morgan retweeted
I’ve had some criticism for publishing this man’s picture. As I’ve had with similar stories.
Apparently, reporting on someone’s publicly stated views and activities is now considered ‘outing’ them.
But these men have already ‘outed’ themselves.
They’ve published their own names, photographs and details of their activities online. For anyone to see.
And when information about their profession or place of work is also publicly available, it hardly takes a detective to join the dots.
I haven’t gone digging into their private lives or uncovered some great secret. I’ve reported information they’ve chosen to make public.
But here’s the more important point. These are stories of legitimate public interest.
In this case, a man publicly announced plans to organise a group to turn up at a parkrun event to give people he calls ‘transphobes’ a fright.
In other words, to give women campaigning for fairness in female sport a fright.
I recognise he may not be aware that many of these women have already experienced abuse, threats and intimidation. But that doesn’t make his plans any less newsworthy.
I also understand this man is employed as a science teacher. Which, if correct, raises further questions about his judgement.
As a journalist, my job is to report the facts accurately and give people the opportunity to respond. He was offered the chance to comment. He didn’t take it.
Suggesting that legitimate public-interest reporting is somehow unethical is just another way of trying to silence journalists.
Are we supposed to anonymise people who have already publicly identified themselves to protect their ‘feelings’? Or simply not report the story?
This is how you create a chilling effect on journalism.
And that should concern anyone who believes in a free press.
The purpose of journalism isn’t to protect people from scrutiny. It’s to report matters of public interest - even when the people involved would rather we didn’t.
That’s how a free press works.
Read story below 👇
Sam Morgan retweeted
Here is a really good study of how Western (mainly American) medical fads come and go and are globalized. Published pre-trans craze. "Crazy like us: the globalization of the American psyche" by Ethan Watters
Sam Morgan retweeted
...the March review of “protection of the female category” went to an expert panel with confidential membership, not the 'Gender Equality, Diversity and Inclusion' commission. So that commission was already sidelined on the sex-category question before it was abolished ...
Sam Morgan retweeted
The International Olympic Committee has scrapped its Gender Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Commission. The group of gender ideologists that inflicted so much damage on women’s sport has been unceremoniously dismantled. Good. There is no place for fairy tale thinking at any level of sport.
Sam Morgan retweeted
Some excellent news to start the week!!
Sam Morgan retweeted
Mike agrees it's easy to tell who is male and who is female without the need for "genital inspections".
Yes, we TERFs agree.
It really is that easy.
Sam Morgan retweeted
Psychopaths do seek positions of power. Priest, doctor, politician, CEO, police, councillor to name a few and since 2018 also trannie. Trannie is one of the few things you can become without skills, but being a doctor AND a trannie... Fucking BOOM. Sainthood and power.
Sam Morgan retweeted
I am not condoning sexual assault at all but dude is making up the numbers or deliberately twisting the math. But were it true that 75,000 girls were indeed assaulted how would adding perverted boys in girls sports help?
Sam Morgan retweeted
I think the people who are fully immersed in intersectional nonsense really CAN'T see the difference between trans and gay. To them it's all about being an oppressed minority, and somehow they are all grouped together. It's how you get Queers for Palestine.
Sam Morgan retweeted
家父長制は、人間の生殖手段の所有と支配を中心に組織された権力のシステムである。
生産手段は労働者を所有せずに所有できる。人間の生殖手段は、それらを有する人間から切り離すことはできない。
この区別は根本的である。生殖手段への支配は、必然的に人々への支配を伴う。
資本主義が経済的権力を持つ者たちが生産手段を支配し、手段を持たない者たちを搾取することを許すとして批判されるなら、なぜ女性の生殖能力の商業化が、反資本主義的または社会主義的を自称する人々からの同等の精査を免れるべきなのか？
それは、左翼的立場を自認する人々からの、はるかに多くの精査に値する。なぜなら、人間の生殖手段は工場、土地、鉱山権利ではないからだ。
女性と少女たちは人間である。
労働の搾取と商品化に反対する解放の理論は、女性の生殖能力へのアクセスを購入することが、それ以外に非難する経済的支配の形態とは異なる扱いを受けるべき理由を説明しなければならない。
支配のメカニズムを所有から購入、または賃貸購入、または完全にオプトアウトに変えることは、解放とはならない。そして、「sex work is work」や「trans-'women' are women」を唱えながらフェミニストを自称する者たちによって、搾取と虐待として認識されないままにしておくべきではない。
現在のリベラル、反資本主義的、社会主義的、フェミニストを自称する左翼のプラットフォームにおけるこれらの矛盾は、マルクス主義的でも共産主義的でも社会主義的でもフェミニスト的でもない――そして、それらのいずれかを自認するなら、それは彼らがポーザーで順応主義者だからだ。
「sex work is work」と「transwomen are women」の背後に誰と何があるかを知りたければ、これらの理念の擁護によって誰が助けられ、誰が害されるかをマッピングするだけでよい。
そして、誰かが私が現在の左翼の形態を拒絶する理由を知りたければ、それは彼らが左翼的でさえなく――言葉でも、行動でも、政策でも、原則でもないからだ。
Patriarchy is a system of power organized around the ownership and control of the means of human reproduction.
The means of production can be owned without owning the worker. The means of human reproduction cannot be separated from the human beings who possess those means.
This distinction is fundamental. Control over the means of reproduction necessarily entails control over people.
If capitalism is criticized for allowing those with economic power to control the means of production and exploit those without means, why should the commercialization of women's reproductive capacities escape equivalent scrutiny by people who claim to be anti-capitalist or pro-socialist?
It deserves much more scrutiny by people who purportedly have a left wing position because the means of human reproduction is not factories, land, or mining rights.
Women and girls are human beings.
A theory of liberation that opposes the exploitation and commodification of labour must explain why purchasing access to women's reproductive capacities should be treated differently from the forms of economic domination it otherwise condemns.
Changing the mechanism of control from ownership to purchase or rent-to-own or opting-out entirely does not constitute liberation and should not go unrecognized as exploitation and abuse by those who would claim to be feminists while chanting "sex work is work" and "trans-'women' are women"
These contradictions in the platforms of the present left purporting to be liberal, anticapitalist, socialist and feminist are neither Marxist, communist, socialist or femininist -- and if they think they are any of those things, it's because they are posers and conformists.
If you want to know who and what is behind "sex work is work" and "transwomen are women" all you have to do is map who is helpwd and who is harmed by the championing of these ideas.
And if anyone wants to know why I reject the current iteration of the left -- it's because they are not even left wing -- not in word, not in deed, nor policy or in principle.