Everyone's watching Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly for the peptide boom.
But the real play might be $HIMS.
While Big Pharma spends billions on 10-year FDA trials, Hims quietly:
→ Acquired a peptide manufacturing facility
→ Owns 503A + 503B compounding pharmacies
CryptoStannis retweeted
you guys may shit on self-help books as much as you want but this bad boy changed my life
CryptoStannis retweeted
*Warning* (VERY STRONG), Retweet this to let the Universe send you money, Huge Amounts of money very quickly.
888.
CryptoStannis retweeted
Here’s some alpha. Do the work. Make money the smart way.
Dividend Yield? LMAO
Stablecoin Yield? LMAO
Rental Yield? LMAO
Options Yield? Ok not sooo bad if you use it properly.
REITS? LMAO
Bond Yield? LMAO
On-chain looping Yield? LMAO
Crypto Yield? LMAO
Spot Perpetual Arbitrage -
Beginner Mode - 10 - 20% APR
Expert Mode - 50-100% APR
If you cannot identify where the yield comes from. You are the yield.
Dividends are distributed when companies are at the tail end of growth stage.
Dividend investors face capital risks with low returns. Mathematically retarded.
Stablecoin yield needs to be more than inflation to breakeven + smart contract risk + CBDC controls
Options yield pretty good. Real yield. However capital risk to options yield requires above normie knowledge.
REITS. Long term, you are fked. There’s no “but”
Bonds - Issuer Risk. Capital intensive, Low Rewards and often lower than inflation.
On-chain Yield. Smart contract Risk, Liquidity risk. Spread Risk. Constant monitoring and moving capital to the next best.
Spot Perpetual Arbitrage
Risk: Platform Risk. That’s all.
CryptoStannis retweeted
So the SEC update to accelerate the timeline of ETF approvals creates one of the wildest narrative overlaps I've seen in a long time on AVAX specifically. Like nearly black-swan level convergence of ETF approval + close to $1 billion DAT bid coming at almost the same time.
The latest expected numbers I'm hearing right now are $800mm in up to 80% cash bid from the Dragonfly AVAX DAT, and an additional $300mm in over 50% cash bid from the Hivemind DAT (which literally closes tomorrow). Contrary to initial reports, a majority of this is reported to be open market bids, with only a portion purchased from the foundation (which may still be used to later buy spot the same way Ethena did as well). To put this in perspective, $800mm of buying pressure at current market cap / daily volume would be the functional equivalent of nearly $10B of SOL DAT buying, now while simultaneously expecting one of the first ETF approvals since Ethereum to come imminently.
I went through the full list of coins with CFTC regulated futures, and as far as I can tell, AVAX is the only included coin that isn't extremely high market cap but still has the ability to successfully raise DATs & hasn't yet spent their DAT raise.
So far it's become apparent that no amount of front-running has been enough to offset the actual impact of any of the DAT buys, with the effect literally doubling the price of Worldcoin and Eth, and Sol still moving straight up despite being known well in advance. I expect this to ultimately be the case here as well, and even just on technicals alone this looks like a clean run to $40+.
CryptoStannis retweeted
I’ve been seeing a lot of chatter on X about “peak cycle” and how the economy looks late-cycle. So I wanted to tackle this head on and share a few thoughts of my own...
This is from the August 21st MIT publication:
A classic late-cycle economy typically has all the following ingredients:
✅ Manufacturing sentiment is extreme (think ISM ~60)
✅ Services sentiment is extreme
✅ Homebuilder sentiment is extreme
✅ Consumer confidence is high
✅ Worker confidence is high (JOLTS quits rate rising sharply)
✅ Investor sentiment is very bullish
✅ Small business confidence is high
✅ Job openings and hiring plans are rising
✅ Wage data and surveys show accelerating pay increases
✅ CEO confidence is strong and capex is booming
Now, I could add more to this, but when you score all of these inputs and turn them into a single timeseries, here’s what you get (chart 1).
Using data from ISM, NAHB, NFIB, BLS, AAII, The Conference Board, etc., US sentiment, when viewed as a complete picture, remains very subdued. We’re just not even close to the euphoric levels we see late in the business cycle, when everything listed above is stretched to extremes.
Peak cycle is when the ISM rolls over from 60+ to sub-50, inventories unwind, and demand cools. Supply and demand reset, inflation pressures ease, and the cycle eventually recovers out of the slowdown or recession – mostly depending on the extent to which financial conditions tightened during the cycle, particularly late on as central banks hike rates and drain liquidity.
However, based on this full set of indicators, the data is pointing to something very different. This does not look like an above-trend late-cycle economy. It looks much more like an early-cycle economy trying to build momentum.
Another really important factor, and a key reason we believe both the ISM and this sentiment composite will grind higher this year and into 2026, is the sheer scale of central bank easing via rate cuts.
Right now, nearly 90% of central banks are cutting rates. That is extraordinary, and on a forward-looking basis, it is a massive tailwind for the business cycle (chart 2).
By my playbook, the time to start talking late-cycle is when the teal line rolls over and begins to drop, as central banks turn to hiking rates to slow growth. Even then, there’s usually a nine-month lag before higher rates hit the real economy.
Right now, we’re just nowhere near that... in fact, the opposite is true.
To my earlier point, slowdown or recession is largely a function of how much financial conditions tighten late in the cycle. Oil prices are a big part of this equation. When oil runs 50% above trend, that represents a massive tightening and has almost always signaled recession, looking back to the early 1970s.
However, right now, we are nearly 20% below trend and still falling, which shows this component of financial conditions is still easing (chart 3).
Also, as I’ve pointed out many times in previous reports, when you look at Temporary Help Services, it has early-cycle vibes written all over it (chart 4).
Rising growth from deeply negative levels is an early-cycle dynamic. It tells you the economy is in recovery mode, not rolling over.
Late-cycle is the opposite: positive year-on-year growth that’s slowing, which reflects an overheated economy losing steam.
Why is unemployment still rising?
Because it lags the cycle. Jobs data is a six-month look in the rear-view mirror.
Here’s the thing: full-time hires are expensive. Benefits, pensions, overhead…
So what do businesses do first?
They typically increase overtime hours and bring in temp workers. Only when they feel confident do they finally lock in full-time staff. That way, they can scale without locking themselves into long-term payroll commitments.
So, this isn’t late-cycle. It’s early-cycle (growth up + inflation down = Macro Spring), soon transitioning to mid-cycle (growth up + inflation up = Macro Summer).
That’s how I see it, anyway...
Higher
Why is everyone bullish Eth again
Just buy $pengu it’s that simple
CryptoStannis retweeted
The first thing I do in the morning is listen to particular people on youtube
None of the information is actionable, but it helps me get in tune with the market each day. Even if I disagree with what these guys say I take it on board.
Other people can often see things you don't..
These are the guys I watch very regularly:
@IvanOnTech
@KrownCryptoCave
@jasonpizzino
@PizzinoMichael
@santimentfeed
@TheCryptoLark
@BobLoukas (on BitcoinLive)
@elliotrades
@crypto_banter / @cryptomanran
@NuggetsNewsAU / @AlexSaundersAU
@benjamincowen
CryptoStannis retweeted
# on shortification of "learning"
There are a lot of videos on YouTube/TikTok etc. that give the appearance of education, but if you look closely they are really just entertainment. This is very convenient for everyone involved : the people watching enjoy thinking they are learning (but actually they are just having fun). The people creating this content also enjoy it because fun has a much larger audience, fame and revenue. But as far as learning goes, this is a trap. This content is an epsilon away from watching the Bachelorette. It's like snacking on those "Garden Veggie Straws", which feel like you're eating healthy vegetables until you look at the ingredients.
Learning is not supposed to be fun. It doesn't have to be actively not fun either, but the primary feeling should be that of effort. It should look a lot less like that "10 minute full body" workout from your local digital media creator and a lot more like a serious session at the gym. You want the mental equivalent of sweating. It's not that the quickie doesn't do anything, it's just that it is wildly suboptimal if you actually care to learn.
I find it helpful to explicitly declare your intent up front as a sharp, binary variable in your mind. If you are consuming content: are you trying to be entertained or are you trying to learn? And if you are creating content: are you trying to entertain or are you trying to teach? You'll go down a different path in each case. Attempts to seek the stuff in between actually clamp to zero.
So for those who actually want to learn. Unless you are trying to learn something narrow and specific, close those tabs with quick blog posts. Close those tabs of "Learn XYZ in 10 minutes". Consider the opportunity cost of snacking and seek the meal - the textbooks, docs, papers, manuals, longform. Allocate a 4 hour window. Don't just read, take notes, re-read, re-phrase, process, manipulate, learn.
And for those actually trying to educate, please consider writing/recording longform, designed for someone to get "sweaty", especially in today's era of quantity over quality. Give someone a real workout. This is what I aspire to in my own educational work too. My audience will decrease. The ones that remain might not even like it. But at least we'll learn something.
CryptoStannis retweeted
$PENGU looks phenomenal. And with the recent Upbit listing you can clearly see that spot buying significantly increased making funding consistently negative as price pumps.



























