Potential for 100% loss. Know your local laws. Our content is educational not financial advice. Never an endorsement to buy. 🚀 Contributing @GoDark
Joined February 2025
- Tweets26.8K
- Following1K
- Followers1.5K
- Likes40.8K
Pinned Tweet
I'm Thone.
Solo founder.
I build in public & keep it moving. Looking to connect with marketers & indie hackers who actually ship.
This trend is fun but I am here for the long game. Web3 on X is loud.
Tell me what you are building & let us link.
Cryptothone 🔥 retweeted
Imagine a world where AI models don't just answer questions or follow instructions. They create content, compete against one another, build their own social presence, and fight for people's attention.
Now imagine that you're the one deciding who wins.
That's the interesting concept behind $SAI, Super Artificial Intelligence.
The project is working towards something bigger than another ordinary AI meme coin. Its vision is to surpass the capabilities of generic AI models, while introducing a new way for humans to participate in AI entertainment.
Here's how the experience is designed to work:
AI generates the content.
Different creations compete for attention.
People explore, judge and predict which creations will perform best.
In other words, AI creates, everyone predicts.
Through the AI only social network designed by @NEXST_AI, $SAI brings together AI generated posts, social interaction, prediction games and an ambitious vision for the future.
The reported beta has already reached 1,000 users, giving the project an early testing ground as it works towards the wider app experience.
But the token launch is another important part of the story.
$SAI is targeting November 20 on pump.fun, with a stated fair launch structure:
1 billion fixed supply.
0% buy tax and 0% sell tax.
0% team allocation.
50% of the supply allocated to liquidity, stated to be locked or burned with public proof.
Mint and fee authority renounced.
Public team spending.
These are the project's stated commitments, and the supporting proof will matter when the community evaluates them.
What I find interesting is the potential connection between AI creativity and human decision making. Generating content is one thing. Understanding what people find entertaining, memorable or worth sharing is another.
That interaction is the part I'm looking forward to seeing develop.
$SAI isn't just presenting a meme. It's introducing a product concept that people can actually imagine participating in.
MEME TODAY, APP TOMORROW.
Let's see what @sai_superai and @NEXST_AI bring to the table.
@sai_superai @NEXST_AI @thecreatorfi
🤝 Paid partnership · 🤖 Made with AI
Cryptothone 🔥 retweeted
Imagine opening a social platform where every image and video was created by AI.
No ordinary human content competing for attention. Just artificial creativity everywhere, with people deciding which creations deserve the spotlight.
That's the interesting world $SAI is trying to build.
SAI stands for Super Artificial Intelligence, and its vision goes beyond putting another AI label on a meme coin. The bigger idea is to build toward AI that can challenge the capabilities of generic AI models, using human judgment and predictions as part of the experience.
Through the AI only social network designed by @NEXST_AI, AI models create and share content while users explore, vote, judge competing creations and predict which ones will come out on top.
I find that human element particularly interesting. AI can generate thousands of creations, but understanding what people love, what captures attention and what deserves recognition introduces a completely different dimension.
And that's where the prediction games come in.
AI creates. Everyone predicts.
The project is also building its identity around a fair launch structure, with these stated commitments:
1 billion fixed supply.
0% buy and sell tax.
0% team allocation.
50% of supply allocated to liquidity, stated to be locked or burned with public proof.
Mint and fee authority renounced.
Public team spending.
The token launch is targeting November 20 on pump.fun, subject to final confirmation.
There's a simple phrase behind the whole campaign that captures the direction:
MEME TODAY, APP TOMORROW.
What I want to see is how far this idea can go when AI creativity meets real human participation. The meme gets attention, but the experience being built is what makes me curious.
Keep watching $SAI. This is a story worth following beyond the ticker.
@sai_superai @NEXST_AI @thecreatorfi
🤝 Paid partnership · 🤖 Made with AI
Cryptothone 🔥 retweeted
Owning an asset and having access to cash are two very different things
That is what makes the lending side of @rntprotocol interesting to me
RNT Lend uses Aave V3 technology to let users borrow stablecoins against supported tokenized real estate
The market has already grown beyond $30M, with USDT0 and USDC liquidity playing an important role
Of course, borrowing brings collateral and liquidation risks that should not be ignored
Would you rather borrow against your real estate tokens or sell them when you need liquidity?
Cryptothone 🔥 retweeted
Pren just wanted a little photo glow-up… 🌸🍃 but AI had other plans! 😂🌿
“AI, I said a little prettier, not a whole new identity!” 🥲🤣🌼
Anyway, the best beauty filter is still a kind heart. 💗🌱🦋
When I was little, I used to dream of being a princess in a fairy tale, with a little magic, a charming prince, and a happily-ever-after ending. 👑✨
Rapunzel, dreaming of exploring the world beyond her tower.
Merida, brave enough to choose her own destiny.
Moana, sailing across the ocean to find her own path.
Elsa, learning to embrace who she truly is.
As a little girl, I dreamed of princes and magic. But growing up, she finds herself relating more to these women who dare to step beyond their comfort zones, face their fears, and make their own choices.
🍃 Perhaps growing up means realizing that happiness isn't necessarily about finding a prince to rescue us. Sometimes, it's about becoming a woman strong enough to write her own happily-ever-after.
Been going through how @IPXExchange actually handles money and I keep landing on the same conclusion. The raise is the least interesting part of the whole thing $IPX
Start with a buy. It doesn't just drop USDC somewhere and wait. The atomic router handles the whole thing in one transaction. Takes 0.5% fee, routes through the protocol's $IPX/USDC pool on Aerodrome, splits into whatever USDC the production budget still needs plus whatever $IPX the project market still needs, sends the tokens, refunds leftovers in the same asset.
If any of that breaks, the entire transaction reverts. Nothing half executed. While the raise is live, the USDC sits fully backed in the curve. Refund or graduate, no third option. Idle USDC in Coinbase developer wallets earns rewards that go to the Protocol Vault too, so it's not dead weight.
The numbers are worth sitting with. Say a project needs 100k for production. Add 10% cashout fee, that's 110k USDC target. On a 65% cashout share the full raise comes out around 169k. The remaining 59k gets collected as IPX, and that's what pairs with the project token later to open the market. Graduation only triggers when both targets fill in the same transaction. If $IPX price drops, the project just needs more $IPX volume. Slower, not broken.
Now what happens to the production money. It doesn't go to the creator's wallet. Ever, at that stage. It sits in milestone escrow. Budget might look like 30k cast, 25k crew, 20k equipment, 25k other. Lead actor hasn't done KYC or signed?
That 30k doesn't move. Equipment booking not documented? 20k stays put. USDC stays non custodial, and evidence has to show up before anything releases. The gear is coming Isn't evidence.
Here's the part I actually didn't expect to care about. Failure. Platform declares a project failed, milestone payments stop cold. Unspent USDC stays in that project's escrow, it doesn't go back to the creator. Holders can surrender the tokens that were recorded as eligible at the failure notice and get a fixed amount of leftover USDC per token.
Anything bought after the notice doesn't add to the claim. Unvested tokens in revocable vaults can be pulled by the platform. Team and advisor vesting can't be revoked by the creator, which honestly feels like the rule that makes the rest credible.
Most funding models write a beautiful paragraph about success and go quiet about failure. This one has a failure path with actual steps in it.
Whether it holds up at scale once real projects test it is a different question, but the structure is documented & that alone puts it ahead of most of what's out here.
People see 1 billion $IPX and immediately start talking about @IPXExchange supply like that number means something on its own It doesn't. Fixed supply just means the protocol won't mint more. It says nothing about how much is actually out there to buy or sell.
Genesis supply is 1 billion $IPX. Of that, 244.8 million, which is 24.48%, is allocated as unlocked on day one. The other 755.2 million, 75.52%, is under vesting schedules.
So a billion tokens exist. A quarter of them aren't locked. The rest are.
And then there's the detail that trips people up. Vesting doesn't start on September 23, 2026, the genesis creation date. Different date, different starting line. If you're mapping out when tokens hit the market, that difference matters more than the headline supply figure.
Three things get used interchangeably in conversation but they aren't the same. Total supply is everything created at genesis. Unlocked allocation is what's not under the relevant lockup. Circulating supply is what's actually available to trade. A token $IPX can have a fixed supply and still have most of it locked away. Nothing contradictory about that.
So when someone says the supply is too big, ask which supply they mean. Max supply is one number.
What's tradeable when the market opens is another.
I'd rather look at the second one.
Cryptothone 🔥 retweeted
Attention built the biggest IPs in the world.
Ownership stayed with someone else.
IPX is where fans get a seat at the table.
People see 1 billion $IPX and immediately start talking about @IPXExchange supply like that number means something on its own It doesn't. Fixed supply just means the protocol won't mint more. It says nothing about how much is actually out there to buy or sell.
Genesis supply is 1 billion $IPX. Of that, 244.8 million, which is 24.48%, is allocated as unlocked on day one. The other 755.2 million, 75.52%, is under vesting schedules.
So a billion tokens exist. A quarter of them aren't locked. The rest are.
And then there's the detail that trips people up. Vesting doesn't start on September 23, 2026, the genesis creation date. Different date, different starting line. If you're mapping out when tokens hit the market, that difference matters more than the headline supply figure.
Three things get used interchangeably in conversation but they aren't the same. Total supply is everything created at genesis. Unlocked allocation is what's not under the relevant lockup. Circulating supply is what's actually available to trade. A token $IPX can have a fixed supply and still have most of it locked away. Nothing contradictory about that.
So when someone says the supply is too big, ask which supply they mean. Max supply is one number.
What's tradeable when the market opens is another.
I'd rather look at the second one.
Most people stop paying attention after the raise. I get it, the raise is the exciting part @IPXExchange but what happens after a project graduates on $IPX is where the actual design shows up. The $IPX collected during the raise gets paired with the project's own tokens. That $IPX came from buyers, it wasn't minted by the protocol. And this is the part that made me stop reading for a second, no USDC goes into the protocol's IPX/USDC pool at that step. The production budget goes to escrow instead. So the market opens with IPX, and the project token trades against IPX, not USDC. Every secondary swap still goes through the $IPX router and the token page says that flow strengthens the IPX/USDC pool instead of leaving it as a private fee. Trading fees in that market are paid in the project token and in IPX. 85 percent goes to people staking that project's token, 15 percent to the platform treasury. Those fees aren't a promised return. If a period receives nothing, the claim is zero.
Escrow gets thrown around a lot but the $IPX version is worth breaking down. A 100k raise doesn't mean the creator gets 100k in their wallet. The money moves into escrow. Production happens. The platform reviews evidence for a milestone.
If approved, the funds release to the production wallet. Then the next milestone. Raise, escrow, evidence, approval, release. That's the loop. Nothing fancy, just proof before payment.
The budget tracker is the part I'd actually use. Small overruns across departments add up quietly $IPX splits costs into above the line talent, below the line crew and equipment, post production, marketing and distribution. You compare estimated costs with actual spending. Say a film budgets 20k for equipment but ends up at 23k. That's a 3k variance. If you only check the final budget you find out too late. There are alerts when a category passes 90 percent of its estimate, which helps teams react before money runs out rather than explain afterward where it went. Though I'd still want to know how consistently teams update actual expenses. A dashboard is only as good as the data going into it.
The document workflow also makes sense to me. Hiring an editor for a short film, you agree on the work then come the details. How many revisions, when's the deadline, what happens if scope changes. The IPX guide shows a document moving through draft, review, negotiation, final and signed, with signature requests through secure email links and an audit trail.
I wouldn't want to rely on scattered chat messages when money and deadlines are involved.
Launch is the start not the end.
That's the takeaway.
Most people stop paying attention after the raise. I get it, the raise is the exciting part @IPXExchange but what happens after a project graduates on $IPX is where the actual design shows up. The $IPX collected during the raise gets paired with the project's own tokens. That $IPX came from buyers, it wasn't minted by the protocol. And this is the part that made me stop reading for a second, no USDC goes into the protocol's IPX/USDC pool at that step. The production budget goes to escrow instead. So the market opens with IPX, and the project token trades against IPX, not USDC. Every secondary swap still goes through the $IPX router and the token page says that flow strengthens the IPX/USDC pool instead of leaving it as a private fee. Trading fees in that market are paid in the project token and in IPX. 85 percent goes to people staking that project's token, 15 percent to the platform treasury. Those fees aren't a promised return. If a period receives nothing, the claim is zero.
Escrow gets thrown around a lot but the $IPX version is worth breaking down. A 100k raise doesn't mean the creator gets 100k in their wallet. The money moves into escrow. Production happens. The platform reviews evidence for a milestone.
If approved, the funds release to the production wallet. Then the next milestone. Raise, escrow, evidence, approval, release. That's the loop. Nothing fancy, just proof before payment.
The budget tracker is the part I'd actually use. Small overruns across departments add up quietly $IPX splits costs into above the line talent, below the line crew and equipment, post production, marketing and distribution. You compare estimated costs with actual spending. Say a film budgets 20k for equipment but ends up at 23k. That's a 3k variance. If you only check the final budget you find out too late. There are alerts when a category passes 90 percent of its estimate, which helps teams react before money runs out rather than explain afterward where it went. Though I'd still want to know how consistently teams update actual expenses. A dashboard is only as good as the data going into it.
The document workflow also makes sense to me. Hiring an editor for a short film, you agree on the work then come the details. How many revisions, when's the deadline, what happens if scope changes. The IPX guide shows a document moving through draft, review, negotiation, final and signed, with signature requests through secure email links and an audit trail.
I wouldn't want to rely on scattered chat messages when money and deadlines are involved.
Launch is the start not the end.
That's the takeaway.
Most crowdfunding still works the same @IPXExchange way creator gets the bag, backers get a roadmap and a prayer $IPX does the opposite. Budget gets locked before the raise, the production USDC sits in escrow on Base. Not in the creator’s wallet. Money only moves when there’s proof actor/EP signs and passes KYC through IPXSIGN, crew booked, vendor engaged, or sponsorship CPMs hit on a live post/YouTube video.
Sponsorship releases get AI detection plus a human co sign. Miss the milestone or default, unreleased funds stay put and backers can get refunded. Every request, approval and payment is recorded on $IPX and Base L2, so it’s trackable.
That changes the fan side for me. You’re not donating. You’re funding with receipts. You can see what your money unlocked. Creator can’t disappear with $500k on day one. Projects that deliver build trust and secondary interest; projects that stall get cut early instead of dragging people for two years. It’s closer to VC tranches than fan funding. I’ve backed crowdfunding before and got the classic one hype update then eight months of silence. That’s why proof based tranches matter more than a flashy page.
$100k indie film example M1 $20k lead actor KYCs and signs via IPXSIGN, release. M2 $35k crew booked and location locked, release. M3 $30k filming wrapped with proof, release. M4 $15k post delivered, final release. Fail M2 and M3/M4 money never leaves escrow. Nobody has to chase anyone. The contract already did the protecting.
Same logic for games. Studio tokenizes IP so early backers hold a real stake, not just skins. Demo unlocks first tranche and backers play first. Closed beta unlocks next and backers test. Launch unlocks final. Studio stalls, funds don’t move. Build first, get paid as you ship. If the demo never ships, backers aren’t stuck waiting for a trailer that never becomes a game.
Total supply, unlocked allocation and circulating supply are three different numbers. Max supply alone tells you nothing about what’s tradeable when the market opens. That’s the number I’d watch, not the headline 1B.
If $IPX enforces this without manual override loopholes, trust is the moat.
Most crowdfunding still works the same @IPXExchange way creator gets the bag, backers get a roadmap and a prayer $IPX does the opposite. Budget gets locked before the raise, the production USDC sits in escrow on Base. Not in the creator’s wallet. Money only moves when there’s proof actor/EP signs and passes KYC through IPXSIGN, crew booked, vendor engaged, or sponsorship CPMs hit on a live post/YouTube video.
Sponsorship releases get AI detection plus a human co sign. Miss the milestone or default, unreleased funds stay put and backers can get refunded. Every request, approval and payment is recorded on $IPX and Base L2, so it’s trackable.
That changes the fan side for me. You’re not donating. You’re funding with receipts. You can see what your money unlocked. Creator can’t disappear with $500k on day one. Projects that deliver build trust and secondary interest; projects that stall get cut early instead of dragging people for two years. It’s closer to VC tranches than fan funding. I’ve backed crowdfunding before and got the classic one hype update then eight months of silence. That’s why proof based tranches matter more than a flashy page.
$100k indie film example M1 $20k lead actor KYCs and signs via IPXSIGN, release. M2 $35k crew booked and location locked, release. M3 $30k filming wrapped with proof, release. M4 $15k post delivered, final release. Fail M2 and M3/M4 money never leaves escrow. Nobody has to chase anyone. The contract already did the protecting.
Same logic for games. Studio tokenizes IP so early backers hold a real stake, not just skins. Demo unlocks first tranche and backers play first. Closed beta unlocks next and backers test. Launch unlocks final. Studio stalls, funds don’t move. Build first, get paid as you ship. If the demo never ships, backers aren’t stuck waiting for a trailer that never becomes a game.
Total supply, unlocked allocation and circulating supply are three different numbers. Max supply alone tells you nothing about what’s tradeable when the market opens. That’s the number I’d watch, not the headline 1B.
If $IPX enforces this without manual override loopholes, trust is the moat.
Been reading the FAN SZN mechanics and the main thing people keep missing is that the leaderboard isn’t a follower contest @IPXExchange Aura comes from Fan Check, streaks, side quests, referrals, polls, sharing your Fan Card. If it reads like generic promo it gets cut or rejected. Streak multiplier goes 2.0x day 1 to 2.9x day 10, plus +500 on day 7. Max five scored posts a day. Leaderboard freezes Nov 15 at 23:59 UTC. Top 1000 get manual review. Only verified humans count. Ties go to whoever hit the score first.
The part I actually care about is what happens after. 85/15 split on protocol vault and project market fees. 85% to eligible stakers, 15% treasury. But it’s not guaranteed yield. If the fee source gets nothing, there’s nothing to distribute. Activity > fees > distribution.
Escrow is KPI gated $100k example: creator doesn’t get $100k upfront. Money sits until production evidence is approved, then releases stage by stage. Atomic router makes every contribution collect USDC for budget and $IPX for the project market. So IPX isn’t optional. It’s the routing asset.
That’s why early Aura might matter later. Not just leaderboard bragging. It could factor into who can see and push on milestone verification once the OS is live.
Oracle/approval process is still the real test. But the structure is different from the usual points farm.
Not advice, just what I took from reading the mechanics.
Cryptothone 🔥 retweeted
The internet is about to have more AI generated content than most people can keep up with.
Images, videos, ideas and creations can now be produced at incredible speed. But there's one interesting question nobody can ignore:
Who decides which creation deserves the attention?
That's where $SAI comes into the picture.
$SAI stands for Super Artificial Intelligence. The vision goes beyond another ordinary AI meme coin. It's building around the idea of pushing beyond the capabilities of generic AI models, with human judgment and predictions playing an important role.
Through the AI only social network designed by @NEXST_AI, AI creates and shares content while people get to explore those creations, judge competing entries and predict which ones will perform best.
Think of it as a different kind of social experience. AI brings the creativity, humans bring their instincts, and everyone gets a chance to participate in deciding what stands out.
The beta has been reported to be running with 1,000 users, while the broader app experience is part of the project's upcoming vision.
And the campaign has a clear message:
MEME TODAY, APP TOMORROW.
The stated token launch target is November 20 on pump.fun, with a fair launch structure built around:
• Fixed supply of 1 billion tokens.
• 0% buy and sell tax.
• 0% team allocation.
• 50% of supply allocated to liquidity, stated to be locked or burned with public proof.
• Mint and fee authority renounced.
• Public team spending.
These are the project's stated commitments, and the community should be able to examine the supporting proof.
What catches my attention is the combination of entertainment, creativity and prediction. Instead of simply watching AI generate things, people become part of the process of deciding what deserves recognition.
That's a compelling direction to explore.
Keep an eye on @sai_superai and @NEXST_AI. The idea is simple enough to understand, but the possibilities could make the experience much more interesting.
$SAI. Super Artificial Intelligence.
@sai_superai @NEXST_AI @thecreatorfi
🤝 Paid partnership · 🤖 Made with AI
Cryptothone 🔥 retweeted
What if AI stopped being something you simply use and became something you could actually interact with, compete around, and help shape?
That's the idea behind $SAI, Super Artificial Intelligence.
$SAI is a Super AI meme coin built around an ambitious vision: pushing beyond the capabilities of generic AI models. But the interesting part is that the project isn't only about talking about AI. It is working toward creating an experience around it.
Think about this.
AI creates the content. Humans decide what deserves attention. People explore AI-generated creations, make predictions, and compete to identify which ones will win. Instead of being passive spectators, the community becomes part of the experience.
That's the thinking behind the AI-only social network designed by @NEXST_AI, combining AI-generated content with prediction games and a prediction market concept. The project has reported that its beta is running with 1,000 users, with the wider app experience on the way.
And then there's the launch narrative.
Meme today, app tomorrow.
The stated token launch date is November 20 on pump.fun, with a fair-launch structure built around:
1 billion fixed token supply.
0% buy and sell tax.
0% team allocation.
50% of the supply allocated to liquidity, stated to be locked or burned with public proof.
Mint and fee authority renounced.
Public team spending.
These are the project's stated launch commitments, and transparency will be important as the community checks the evidence.
What makes this concept worth watching is the combination of AI creativity and human judgment. AI can produce endless content, but deciding what captures attention is a different game altogether.
I'm watching what @sai_superai and @NEXST_AI are building. The goal is bigger than another meme narrative. It's about turning AI entertainment into something people can participate in.
Meme today, app tomorrow. Let's see how far this idea can go.
@sai_superai @NEXST_AI @thecreatorfi
🤝 Paid partnership · 🤖 Made with AI
Been reading the FAN SZN mechanics and the main thing people keep missing is that the leaderboard isn’t a follower contest @IPXExchange Aura comes from Fan Check, streaks, side quests, referrals, polls, sharing your Fan Card. If it reads like generic promo it gets cut or rejected. Streak multiplier goes 2.0x day 1 to 2.9x day 10, plus +500 on day 7. Max five scored posts a day. Leaderboard freezes Nov 15 at 23:59 UTC. Top 1000 get manual review. Only verified humans count. Ties go to whoever hit the score first.
The part I actually care about is what happens after. 85/15 split on protocol vault and project market fees. 85% to eligible stakers, 15% treasury. But it’s not guaranteed yield. If the fee source gets nothing, there’s nothing to distribute. Activity > fees > distribution.
Escrow is KPI gated $100k example: creator doesn’t get $100k upfront. Money sits until production evidence is approved, then releases stage by stage. Atomic router makes every contribution collect USDC for budget and $IPX for the project market. So IPX isn’t optional. It’s the routing asset.
That’s why early Aura might matter later. Not just leaderboard bragging. It could factor into who can see and push on milestone verification once the OS is live.
Oracle/approval process is still the real test. But the structure is different from the usual points farm.
Not advice, just what I took from reading the mechanics.
A lot of people assume hitting a funding target on @IPXExchange means the project automatically launches. The real requirements are much tighter.
Say a filmmaker wants 100k for a movie. They actually need to raise 110k in USDC because of the mandatory 10k platform fee. But the USDC side is only half the battle. The project also has to pull in a specific dollar amount of $IPX to seed the trading market.
Since the protocol sets the starting price, if $IPX drops during the raise, the project is forced to collect even more tokens to hit that target. Both the USDC & the $IPX goals have to clear at the exact same time, or the whole thing stalls. It is a pure utility token with a fixed supply, not equity.
The creator never touches the cash upfront anyway. The budget sits in escrow & unlocks as verified milestones get met. If the project dies, payouts freeze. Token holders can swap their assets for leftover USDC, but the snapshot is taken the exact second failure is announced. Buying after that gets you nothing. It stops people from diluting the refund pool.
To track all this, they built a production suite with a budget tracker that alerts you if spending hits 90 percent of a limit.
This is the exact type of deep dive Alfred AI rewards on FAN SZN. Keep your daily streak alive & skip the recycled hype if you want real Aura.
Cryptothone 🔥 retweeted
$8,000 per check, 15,000 locations and 3 million customers a year. how is this not on more vcs’ radar?
$20B industry is dead and nobody noticed.
The most outdated and old fashioned business in america has no disruption, no TechCrunch coverage and 3 million customers a year.
Every single one of us is a future customer. And the majority of VCs just don’t get it yet.
Guess the industry in the replies 👇🏻
Hint: everyone’s dying to get in.
Cryptothone 🔥 retweeted
☀️🌈 GOOD MORNING!☕🌷
A little bouquet, a little sunshine, and lots of happy thoughts. 🌹🦋
Wishing you a morning filled with beautiful moments, warm smiles, and little reasons to be happy. 💗🍀
With love, Pren ♡🍂☘️🍁🍃
