#Avalanche #AVAX Validator NodeID-ACMpxS8rnwkAA4JfCUm4vNoWQaznNCqGV
Joined April 2011
- Tweets21.7K
- Following2.2K
- Followers2K
- Likes44.1K
Gündoğdu🔺 retweeted
“Maybe we’re dreaming a little too big, but here we are.”
@JohnNahas84 joined @davidgokhshtein on The Breakdown to discuss six years of building toward the NYSE milestone, and why Avalanche lets institutions build blockchains around their business, their needs, and their compliance.
Gündoğdu🔺 retweeted
BREAKING: Avalanche deposits on @aave v4 hit $225M+
Deposits are up 295% since the end of October, with active loans topping $100M.
V4 launched on Avalanche in July, marking its first expansion beyond Ethereum.
Gündoğdu🔺 retweeted
THE BLOCK: AVAX One $AVX scrapped its modular data center plans to focus on its Avalanche treasury strategy, which held 14.17 million avalanche-2:native and equivalents as of Sept. 30.
It reported $49.9 million in Q3 net income, driven by $55.1 million in unrealized gains on digital assets.
Gündoğdu🔺 retweeted
Wall Street is entering a new era.
Ava Labs President & COO @CharleyCooper01 joined NYSE Live to discuss Avalanche’s role in the next generation of financial market infrastructure, which will be invisible to the user.
Gündoğdu🔺 retweeted
What changed on Sep 20?
Two things.
1. Helicon went live Sep 22. It let validators set a minimum C-Chain gas price. The base fee went from about 0.05 nAVAX to 5 nAVAX, and base fee burn went up 14x.
2. Priority tips grew too, starting Sep 19, before Helicon. Tips are still 78% of the burn.
l1beat.io/burn
Gündoğdu🔺 retweeted
Global markets need infrastructure built for their demands.
On Bloomberg, @MorganKrupetsky explained why the upcoming NYSE-affiliated trading platform will be built on Avalanche:
Custom networks, connected liquidity, and integrations built for institutions.
Gündoğdu🔺 retweeted
Avalanche architecture was innately designed to push forward sovereignty, privacy, customization, security, and interchain connectivity.
Avalanche L1s don’t share a global execution environment or validator set. Each network runs its own consensus, maintains its own state, and determines who can validate, transact, or access its data.
That means a financial institution can operate a private, permissioned blockchain with its own regulatory requirements, while another institution operates an entirely different network. Neither competes for the other’s blockspace or inherits its security assumptions.
For regulated financial institutions, privacy is a fundamental infrastructure requirement. Avalanche L1s allow institutions to control network participation and data access, with the flexibility to implement advanced cryptographic protections, including encryption and zero-knowledge proofs, to safeguard sensitive transactions and counterparty information while preserving regulatory oversight.
Institutions also retain control over transaction processing, fee structures, and network governance, allowing compliance requirements to be enforced at the infrastructure level.
Avalanche Interchain Messaging allows these independent networks to communicate through cryptographically verified messages, without requiring a shared execution layer.
The NYSE-affiliated tokenized securities platform is a particularly compelling example of why this architecture matters. Following more than a year of evaluation and testing across multiple blockchain networks, Avalanche technology was selected to provide its core ledger infrastructure.
Financial markets require infrastructure built around their own rules, participants, and regulatory obligations, not simply faster transactions on a shared chain.
Avalanche anticipated this need six years ago.
Gündoğdu🔺 retweeted
Trade 24/7.
NYSE’s Michael Blaugrund explains how bringing markets onchain will make them more efficient and improve the experience for investors and businesses alike, and how Avalanche is playing a key role in this.
Avalanche Originals. Episode 2.
Gündoğdu🔺 retweeted
The economics of decentralized networks deserve the same intellectual rigor as the protocols themselves.
Great to see the Avalanche Foundation bringing together researchers from Stanford, Oxford, Imperial and other leading institutions to tackle fundamental questions around validator incentives, security, and value accrual.
Gündoğdu🔺 retweeted
LATEST: ⚡️ Ava Labs says Avalanche will serve as the ledger tech for an upcoming NYSE-affiliated tokenized securities trading platform, designed to support 24/7 clearing and settlement.
ALT A glowing red circle with the Avalanche logo, featuring two white stylized triangles, is set against a dramatic volcanic landscape with glowing lava cracks.
ALT The image shows the facade of the New York Stock Exchange building, featuring tall columns and statues. The name "New York Stock Exchange" is prominently displayed above the entrance. Surrounding buildings rise in the background.
Gündoğdu🔺 retweeted
The New York Stock Exchange is building on Avalanche 🔺
Their new tokenized stocks platform is designed to support 24/7 trading, clearing and settlement. Exclusively on Avalanche.
WSJ exclusive below 👇
Gündoğdu🔺 retweeted
Learn more about Wall Street’s next chapter on Avalanche:
avalanche.com/about/blog/wal…
Gündoğdu🔺 retweeted
Another huge announcement today with @CharlesSchwab adding $AVAX to Schwab Crypto🔺
BREAKING: $13T @CharlesSchwab adds AVAX to Schwab Crypto
Schwab Crypto clients can now trade AVAX, marking the platform’s first crypto expansion beyond Bitcoin & Ethereum.
Gündoğdu🔺 retweeted
Why is Wall Street increasingly choosing Avalanche?
A better onchain experience. Reliable performance. Built to support the requirements of regulated markets.
@mblaugrund of @ICE_Markets, owner of @NYSE, explains why it “checks a lot of boxes”.
Gündoğdu🔺 retweeted
THE BLOCK: The New York Stock Exchange will use Avalanche for settlement infrastructure on its upcoming 24/7 tokenized securities platform.
The platform is targeting a fourth-quarter launch and will use NYSE technology for trade matching, pending regulatory approval, according to the WSJ.
Gündoğdu🔺 retweeted
Why Avalanche for NYSE?
It’s important to note that this was not a quick, monetarily-driven decision made without due diligence, as I’ve seen a few posts speculating that. After more than a year of evaluating and testing multiple blockchain networks, NYSE arrived at Avalanche for a multitude of reasons.
For those who have followed Avalanche closely, this shouldn’t come as much of a surprise. For everyone else, it’s worth understanding the fundamental difference between building for speculative crypto markets and building the infrastructure that underpins global capital markets.
For regulated financial institutions, high TPS and low transaction fees are the baseline. Most modern blockchains can offer some version of both, with the much harder problem being architectural.
Monolithic chains share consensus, execution, and blockspace. Conventional EVM L2s introduce dependencies on external settlement layers, sequencing, and data availability. Both models come with constraints that become particularly consequential when institutions need direct control over their infrastructure, especially when it comes to regulatory compliance.
Avalanche was designed around a different premise.
Avalanche L1s operate with independent consensus, dedicated validator sets, customizable virtual machines, configurable fee markets, and protocol-level permissioning. Institutions can define who validates, who participates, how transactions are processed, and how their networks are governed, with the flexibility to implement regulatory requirements directly into the infrastructure.
They can do so without inheriting the congestion or settlement dependencies of another chain, while retaining the ability to interoperate with other networks and access the broader Avalanche ecosystem’s assets and liquidity.
This combination of sovereignty, customization, performance, and interoperability is what makes Avalanche uniquely suited for true capital markets. It’s one thing to offer institutions a place to deploy applications, anyone can do that. It’s another thing to give them the ability to operate the underlying infrastructure on their own terms.
We’ve spent years building around the conviction that the world’s largest financial institutions would eventually need purpose-built blockchains of their own, rather than forcing entirely different businesses and regulatory environments onto a single shared network.
NYSE’s decision is a powerful validation of that thesis.
And I believe we’re only beginning to appreciate just how important these architectural decisions will be as global financial markets continue to move onchain.
Gündoğdu🔺 retweeted
Six years ago, we understood that the world’s financial infrastructure would never run on a single shared state machine.
We built Avalanche accordingly, and the rest of the industry is beginning to understand why.
Why Avalanche for NYSE?
It’s important to note that this was not a quick, monetarily-driven decision made without due diligence, as I’ve seen a few posts speculating that. After more than a year of evaluating and testing multiple blockchain networks, NYSE arrived at Avalanche for a multitude of reasons.
For those who have followed Avalanche closely, this shouldn’t come as much of a surprise. For everyone else, it’s worth understanding the fundamental difference between building for speculative crypto markets and building the infrastructure that underpins global capital markets.
For regulated financial institutions, high TPS and low transaction fees are the baseline. Most modern blockchains can offer some version of both, with the much harder problem being architectural.
Monolithic chains share consensus, execution, and blockspace. Conventional EVM L2s introduce dependencies on external settlement layers, sequencing, and data availability. Both models come with constraints that become particularly consequential when institutions need direct control over their infrastructure, especially when it comes to regulatory compliance.
Avalanche was designed around a different premise.
Avalanche L1s operate with independent consensus, dedicated validator sets, customizable virtual machines, configurable fee markets, and protocol-level permissioning. Institutions can define who validates, who participates, how transactions are processed, and how their networks are governed, with the flexibility to implement regulatory requirements directly into the infrastructure.
They can do so without inheriting the congestion or settlement dependencies of another chain, while retaining the ability to interoperate with other networks and access the broader Avalanche ecosystem’s assets and liquidity.
This combination of sovereignty, customization, performance, and interoperability is what makes Avalanche uniquely suited for true capital markets. It’s one thing to offer institutions a place to deploy applications, anyone can do that. It’s another thing to give them the ability to operate the underlying infrastructure on their own terms.
We’ve spent years building around the conviction that the world’s largest financial institutions would eventually need purpose-built blockchains of their own, rather than forcing entirely different businesses and regulatory environments onto a single shared network.
NYSE’s decision is a powerful validation of that thesis.
And I believe we’re only beginning to appreciate just how important these architectural decisions will be as global financial markets continue to move onchain.