October Summary: (so far) Total prop firm payouts: +$424,816 Total prop firm expenses: $356,775 Total earned income off discord / affiliation: +$36,308

1/ 🧵 Vest Intern 😂 $200K profit claims, Account #819, a $483K payout post, and @smartpropfirm now removing @lanto_trades as a partner. Timeline, statements and the questions @VestExchange still needs to answer. 2/ Oct 2: Lanto posts +$20K via Vest. Later: "+$200,000 w/ @VestExchange" with Accounts 41–50 showing "A" icons, unlike the numbered icons in the earlier screenshot. Critics questioned whether the labels reflect real account history. 3/ Vest lets traders rename accounts and admits this creates room for misrepresentation; UI/UX fixes are coming. An editable label isn't proof of history, and an "A" icon isn't proof of concealment. But customers can't easily tell the difference. 4/ @thebrianstonk promoted Lanto's "$200K across ten $50K accounts" ($700, code SMART). Dhesi replied "His spend is so low too." What supported that? Screenshots don't show total purchases, resets or costs. 5/ Then: "$483,193.57 payout via Vest Exchange!" ($388,915.35 after split). Entries showed "Processing," with Account 819 visible. Post reportedly deleted. #819 alone doesn't prove 818 failed accounts, but it needs explaining. 6/ Lanto: "Full transparency coming soon," citing TPT ($2M+ made, $300K+ spent). That's a different operation, so it doesn't show Vest spend or net profit. A ~$21K figure also circulated; nothing shows it's complete. 7/ Payouts ≠ net profit. We need: completed vs processing payouts, splits, account/eval/reset costs, the time period, and whether figures cover the same accounts. Without that, nobody can calculate the real return. 8/ Vest said: it doesn't share private spend data without approval; the PNL image was verified unaltered (not an endorsement of other claims); Lanto received his spend data; it expects honest affiliates and is monitoring. 9/ @raghavsharmafx promoted "50% OFF Vest" using Lanto's post. @capital_jn said no such discount existed. Raghav says it was clickbait, the real discount was 5%, and it led to no sales (his only sales: a friend's $4K). That's his claim, unverified. 10/ Misleading discount claims should be corrected. Misleading profit and cost claims deserve the same standard. These are separate matters, judged on their own evidence. No selective enforcement, whoever the affiliate is. 11/ @smartpropfirm is removing @lanto_trades as creator/partner, saying his posts didn't disclose full account numbers and expenses. It will publish the commissions earned from his first results post until the discrepancy, give 100% back via giveaways/donations, and has notified the firm. 12/ This doesn't mean Vest has done the same, and it doesn't prove fraud. But it shows a firm can decide incomplete disclosure falls below its standard. No verified figures exist for Lanto's affiliate earnings, so none are claimed. 13/ Questions for @VestExchange: 1. What is Account 819? 2. Can IDs be verified after renaming? 3. Which payouts are completed vs processing? 4. What does the $21K include? 5. How are low-spend claims checked? 6. Same rules for big affiliates? 14/ Final take: the screenshots raise legitimate questions but don't prove fraud. Transparency must mean more than a verified screenshot. It means giving customers enough accurate information to understand what they're buying. @VestExchange, we need clarity.

Trading The Double SMT 💎

After seeing this much freedom at @VestExchange I can totally understand it's Hype •News Trading ✅ •Scalping ✅ •NO Consistency Rule •NO Min Trading Days •NO Minimum Holding Time •Overnight &Weekend Holding That's all you need 💎 Code FVG -5% off next.vestmarkets.com/r/fvg