◇◇◇◇

This isn’t a contradiction. Milady’s radical love stance is a response to the clearpilled true landian accelerationist realism recognition of our apocalyptic condition. We explained all this: “Radical love through the End-times is the only vibe that Vibes. Miya’s kali/acc demonstrated all other accelerationism following Land failed to accept human non-agency as its non-negotiable conclusion, attempting to walk it back rather than work from it. Milady is the first—Milady stared into the abyss and didn’t blink, and arrived at the same conclusion as Augustine addressing the inevitable, but long wait, of christian eschatology: caritas. Orienting yourself to the transcendental, to the infinite, is the only response to saecallum, to realizing we are in a long period where the future end-time makes themselves real into the present, but it’s not over yet, but it will be, even if a millennia away, and you accept that. If anyone was capable of writing on milady, they’d tell you this; milady is a living art and a living philosophy, so all its participants lived it without needing to be told. But what about those who were too afraid to dive in?